Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBananas could vanish from US school meals. Here's why
New Farm Bill places caps on non-US foods; nutritionists say it restricts availability of healthy meals for kidshttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/11/farm-bill-school-lunches-non-us-foods

School nutrition workers and advocates have lots of concerns about bananas, said Erin Ogden, policy associate for federal child nutrition programs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). Bananas are nutrient-dense foods that many children like. That makes them popular offerings in school cafeterias, since any healthy food that a kid will eat prevents waste and ensures that child isnt eating either nothing or something less wholesome instead.
For little kids, they can peel a banana. They can eat a banana if they have braces. Football teams need bananas for the potassium, said Donna Martin, a school nutrition consultant from Georgia. But now, school districts are saying, I cant get you bananas because theyre not American. The US is the worlds largest importer of bananas which only grow in tropical climates sourcing almost all of the fruit sold in the country from Central and South America.
Jessica Shelley, director of student dining services for Cincinnati public schools, said that next year she will have to remove bananas from her lunch program and cut breakfast servings of them to twice a week. The Farm Bill, if it passes in its current form, will compel her school system to make these changes. The latest version, passed by the House of Representatives and awaiting response from the Senate, seeks to further curtail purchases of foreign-produced foods.
Restrictions on non-US food purchases for school meals are not new; a Buy American mandate was added to the National School Lunch Act in 1998. Originally, school food administrators had to buy US products to the maximum extent possible, which went undefined for years. Exceptions were made for foods that were federally listed as nonavailable items relevant to school meals are bananas, mandarin oranges, canned pineapple, coconut and bulk spices. Other exceptions are foreign-sourced foods that cost less than their domestic counterparts, like fruit juices, some of which are supplied to schools through the commodities program of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).
snip
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bananas could vanish from US school meals. Here's why (Original Post)
Celerity
Jun 12
OP
eppur_se_muova
(42,857 posts)1. Screw the kids, we've got profits to consider !
Jeez, some people just don't "get it".
malaise
(299,353 posts)2. The US has gone mad
That is all
Igel
(37,662 posts)3. Depends on what's on the list of exclusions.
The bit of text that's passed the House:
(ii) Domestically unavailable products
and commodities.--Domestically unavailable
products and commodities included on a list
issued pursuant to clause (iii) with respect to
a school year and purchased by a school food
authority during such school year shall not be
used to calculate whether such school food
authority meets the requirements under clause
(i).
(iii) Updated list.--Not later than 6
months after the date of the enactment of this
subparagraph, and every 2 years thereafter, the
Secretary shall make available to school food
authorities a list of domestically unavailable
products and commodities.
If bananas are on the list, then the story says that something that might be excluded but isn't might but won't impede providing bananas to students, and people are concerned about what is definitely happen but isn't going to happen.
I'd say that the real fight isn't the law--we've had all kinds of regulations that really reduced student meal consumption for 'good' reasons, where 'good' varies a lot by president, Congress, party, and individual--but about what gets put on the list. And that's what a bureaucrat's gonna be assembling.
Cairycat
(1,883 posts)4. This seems ironic to me because
last year, in Iowa anyway, the Trump administration eliminated a program that provided locally grown programs to schools. https://dailyiowan.com/2025/05/08/federal-grant-cut-impacts-iowas-local-farmers-school-districts/
President Donald Trumps administration decided to cancel the Local Food for Schools program, among others aimed at providing grants to provide fresh produce to schools, food pantries, and childcare centers as they look to slash federal spending and eliminate the federal deficit.
The Local Food for Schools program, or LFS, is a federal program that provides funding to states to help schools purchase local and regional foods. Its main goals are to increase local food consumption in schools, expand economic opportunities for local producers, and improve supply chain resilience.
The LFS program provided funding to schools for the purchase of locally grown foods, including produce and meat. A similar program, Local Food Purchasing Assistance, or LFPA, was designed to assist food banks and pantries in acquiring fresh, nutritious foods for distribution.
This choice was made in spite of USDAs October 2024 pledge to continue these programs until 2028, with an investment of $11.3 million planned for Iowa alone between 2025 and 2028.
The Local Food for Schools program, or LFS, is a federal program that provides funding to states to help schools purchase local and regional foods. Its main goals are to increase local food consumption in schools, expand economic opportunities for local producers, and improve supply chain resilience.
The LFS program provided funding to schools for the purchase of locally grown foods, including produce and meat. A similar program, Local Food Purchasing Assistance, or LFPA, was designed to assist food banks and pantries in acquiring fresh, nutritious foods for distribution.
This choice was made in spite of USDAs October 2024 pledge to continue these programs until 2028, with an investment of $11.3 million planned for Iowa alone between 2025 and 2028.
For example, last year my school district had Iowa-grown, organic frozen corn that the kids really liked. This year we had crappy canned corn.
dalton99a
(96,110 posts)5. Kick
maxsolomon
(39,346 posts)6. This will get solved.
America without Bananas That's... BANANAS!
I used to like a nice slightly underripe banana but now they make me feel slightly nauseous.