General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums" Hard to see what military advantage would outweigh robbing 20k people of drinking water."
I can't find anything about this.
Angry
@angrystaffer.bsky.social
· 17h
If true, I have serious concerns about this being a war crime.
Under the laws of armed conflict:
Proportionality: the military advantage has to outweigh the anticipated civilian harm.
Hard to see what military advantage would outweigh robbing 20k people of drinking water.
If true, I have serious concerns about this being a war crime.
— Angry (@angrystaffer.bsky.social) 2026-06-10T15:58:10.401Z
Under the laws of armed conflict:
Proportionality: the military advantage has to outweigh the anticipated civilian harm.
Hard to see what military advantage would outweigh robbing 20k people of drinking water.
Whip-poor-will
(604 posts)run by a sicko...good luck
dem4decades
(14,615 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,617 posts)flvegan
(66,638 posts)as a "military advantage" most likely.
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,299 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,450 posts)Along with collaborators in their administration.
Hope22
(4,953 posts)If they did drop these bombs they are responsible for the crimes against the people. They were duty bound to refuse an illegal mission.
modrepub
(4,237 posts)But US or Israeli strikes? Or US strikes at the direction of Israel? Either way, same purpose, cruelty.