Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(55,260 posts)
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 01:59 AM Jun 11

Why the Supreme Court Is Debating Which Founding Fathers Were Drunks

The court’s docket increasingly features bizarre historical arguments; ‘John Adams took a tankard of hard cider with his breakfast.’

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/supreme-court-session-cases-originalism-birthright-citizenship-second-amendment-c858a23e

https://archive.ph/QRqN5



Do drug users have a constitutional right to own a gun? The answer may depend on what the Supreme Court thinks about the drinking habits of the Founding Fathers. Can states count mail-in ballots that are postmarked on time but arrive after Election Day? That may turn on a long-forgotten voting practice from the Civil War.

As the Supreme Court works through its busiest month, its docket is chockablock with tough cases on modern-day problems. More than ever, the justices are looking deep into the past for answers. The time machine is driven by the ascendance of originalism—the legal philosophy, pioneered by conservatives, that says the meaning of the Constitution’s words shouldn’t evolve over time.

Though the theory has been fashionable for decades, the court’s conservative supermajority has embraced it with new fervor, sending attorneys scrambling for historical nuggets that once were more useful for Trivial Pursuit. “The more this form of analysis gets extended, the stranger it becomes,” said Jonathan Gienapp, law and history professor at Stanford and a critic of originalism. “It’s not obvious what from the past matters, and what doesn’t.”

Second Amendment cases are at the forefront of lawyers’ efforts to amass historical ammunition. That’s thanks to a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that significantly expanded the right to carry a gun. The court decreed that today’s gun regulations are constitutional only if they are consistent with early American historical traditions. Since then, lawyers across the country have argued over what those traditions are. One dispute, pending before the justices, challenges a federal law that prohibits people who use illegal drugs from possessing firearms.

snip
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the Supreme Court Is Debating Which Founding Fathers Were Drunks (Original Post) Celerity Jun 11 OP
Argue the cider was for the probiotics. PuraVidaDreamin Jun 11 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the Supreme Court Is ...