Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(115,801 posts)
Sun Jun 7, 2026, 02:00 PM Yesterday

Challenging his comments on the California election disrupts his strategy of election interference.

For Christ sakes, don't tell the people he has no evidence! That only makes it more difficult for him to sell his election denial lies.

This has disrupted his strategy.

"You are fake news and you are crooked". Then why do you come on a program that is "fake" and "crooked"?

He has had ten years since the 2016 election to bring forth his evidence and he has done nothing but blow smoke. He has no evidence. All he has is lies.

Kristi Welker was not tough on him. He grew angry because he was not successful in drowning out her voice, as he does with everyone that tries to ask him a question.



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Challenging his comments on the California election disrupts his strategy of election interference. (Original Post) kentuck Yesterday OP
Amazing she guided the interview to that point bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1
good! every interview should be done this way... SWBTATTReg Yesterday #5
Boss lady didnt let him do his crazy propaganda SSJVegeta Yesterday #2
EVIDENCE? How dare you ask. usonian Yesterday #3
Welker stood her ground. Good for her. Raven123 Yesterday #4

bucolic_frolic

(56,124 posts)
1. Amazing she guided the interview to that point
Sun Jun 7, 2026, 02:04 PM
Yesterday

It should be the standard going forward. Time to put up or shut up. Bamboo ballots and Giuliani demons are not evidence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Challenging his comments ...