Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep. James Comer plans to make big changes to the hearing process, including not requiring witnesses to swear in.
Last edited Wed Apr 22, 2026, 10:18 PM - Edit history (1)
NEW MEMO from Democrats on the House Oversight Committee memo shows Kentucky Republican Rep. James Comer plans to make big changes to the hearing process, including not requiring witnesses to swear in. trib.al/rjIltID
— The New Republic (@newrepublic.com) 2026-04-22T22:33:19.479724Z
Jasmine Crockett
They paused Oversight Committee hearings the minute we started getting answers about the Epstein files.
— Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (@crockett.house.gov) 2026-04-23T01:18:34.980Z
Now itâs âroundtablesâ: no rules, no oaths, no subpoenas.
You do the math. Because the moment accountability shows up, they shut it down. The survivors deserve better.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. James Comer plans to make big changes to the hearing process, including not requiring witnesses to swear in. (Original Post)
applegrove
9 hrs ago
OP
vapor2
(4,693 posts)1. Why not ? They all have lied under oath anyway
republianmushroom
(22,457 posts)2. Comer's new hearing process will begin with "Once upon a time,"
C_U_L8R
(49,455 posts)3. It's a crime to lie to Congress
Oath or no oath.
GenThePerservering
(3,523 posts)4. He always looks completely in over his head nt