Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(27,613 posts)
Sun Apr 19, 2026, 11:55 AM Sunday

RawStory+ Login Top Stories Daily Listen Now RawStory Supreme Court judge blasted for controversial speech: 'Sufferin

By Ewan Gleadow
Published April 19, 2026 8:05 AM ET

Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas has been heavily criticized for a speech made against progressive politics.

Thomas delivered a scathing critique of progressivism during a speech at the University of Texas Austin Law School, characterizing the political philosophy as fundamentally incompatible with American constitutional principles. Thomas argued that progressivism seeks to replace the foundational premises of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution itself.

"Progressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government," Thomas stated. "[Progressivism] holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God, but from government.

https://www.rawstory.com/clarence-thomas-2676762870/

Hey............ Thomas are you and the other maga criminals on the bench salivating on getting ready to eliminate the 1965 Voting Right Act..........

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RawStory+ Login Top Stories Daily Listen Now RawStory Supreme Court judge blasted for controversial speech: 'Sufferin (Original Post) turbinetree Sunday OP
Says the 3/5 man Whip-poor-will Sunday #1
Sorry, Clarence, but if my rights are in jeopardy I will consult the Constitution, not the Bible. Midnight Writer Sunday #2

Midnight Writer

(25,570 posts)
2. Sorry, Clarence, but if my rights are in jeopardy I will consult the Constitution, not the Bible.
Sun Apr 19, 2026, 02:06 PM
Sunday

Clarence, you sit on the top Court in this country. A Court that is pledged to protect our Constitutional Rights UNDER THE LAW. You seem a bit confused about your assigned job duties.

If my rights are violated, I'm calling a lawyer, not a preacher. I'm taking it to court, not to church. I'll fight for my rights, not pray to the invisible Sky Being for relief.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RawStory+ Login Top Stor...