Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA timely reminder of what Clarence Thomas called his "high tech lynching" on Sept. 10, 1991
https://www.npr.org/2017/12/10/569716802/a-refresher-on-anita-hill-and-clarence-thomasHill was a law professor who had worked for Thomas years earlier at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. She testified that Thomas, as her boss, repeatedly tried to date her and subjected her to extensive unwanted conversations about sex and pornography. Some listeners may find the next recording offensive.
*****
HILL: The incident involved his going to his desk - getting up from a work table, going to his desk, looking at this can and saying, who put pubic hair on my Coke?
*****
HILL: Well, this was a reference to an individual who had a very large penis. And he used the name that he had been referred to in the pornographic material.
*****
CLARENCE THOMAS: From my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I'm concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas. And it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order, this is what will happen to you. You will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A timely reminder of what Clarence Thomas called his "high tech lynching" on Sept. 10, 1991 (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Thursday
OP
A timely reminder that this sex abuser still holds high office after 3 & 1/2 decades!
Clouds Passing
Thursday
#2
I watched the hearing and I thought it was clear that Anita Hill was telling the truth.
walkingman
Thursday
#4
Kid Berwyn
(24,688 posts)1. Long Dong Silver
Now instead of watching pornos all night he gets millions in gratuities from billionaires.
Aint America great?
Clouds Passing
(8,059 posts)2. A timely reminder that this sex abuser still holds high office after 3 & 1/2 decades!
Buckeyeblue
(6,382 posts)3. That speech got him nominated. I always wondered if he wrote it
The Judicial Committee had other witnesses. But that speech hit a nerve and they decided not to have those witnesses testify.
walkingman
(10,978 posts)4. I watched the hearing and I thought it was clear that Anita Hill was telling the truth.
Key Details of the Vote:
Total Votes: 52 "Yea" (Confirm), 48 "Nay" (Oppose).
Supporting Democrats (11): David Boren (OK), John Breaux (LA), Dennis DeConcini (AZ), Alan J. Dixon (IL), J. James Exon (NE), Wyche Fowler (GA), Ernest Hollings (SC), J. Bennett Johnston (LA), Sam Nunn (GA), Chuck Robb (VA), and Richard Shelby (AL).
Opposing Republicans (2): Jim Jeffords (VT) and Robert Packwood (OR).
Final Margin: The narrowest for a Supreme Court nominee in over a century.