Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would you support a candidate that accepts money from AIPAC? (Original Post) Buttoneer Monday OP
the shorter list is probably those who have not nt msongs Monday #1
I dont know, looks like a lot. Eko Monday #2
80 members (15%) of the current US Congress have AIPAC as their all-time top contributor per OpenSecrets reports. Celerity Tuesday #13
Yes, I would. The only donors a political candidate should worry about are convicted felons or an Epstein. n/t Jacson6 Monday #3
And disguised contributions from foreigners nitpicked Tuesday #8
American Jews are "foreigners"? Not very subtle. tritsofme Tuesday #11
Huh???? 3_Limes Tuesday #16
AIPAC is a group of American Jews, not "foreigners" tritsofme Tuesday #19
Not to split hairs, but it's a group of American zionists. 3_Limes Tuesday #22
Will you fail to vote for a Democratic candidate if they have accepted money from AIPAC? sarisataka Monday #4
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #9
I'd have a more difficult time doing it---- but the party control of Jack Valentino Tuesday #5
Last month's N.J. special election to fill Mikie Sherill's seat - I was getting shitloads of mail against Tom 3Hotdogs Tuesday #6
Both Schumer and Jeffries take AIPAC money. Intractable Tuesday #7
Hopefully they stop that. It's good that this issue is getting attention. David__77 Tuesday #17
If we want leaders who do not take AIPAC's money, we will need new leaders. Intractable Tuesday #18
It's not a litmus test, but I'd certainly avoid it if I could 3_Limes Tuesday #10
We have people hoping the Iran war brings end times Norbert Tuesday #12
Will You Help Elect More GOP Fascists If A Dem Takes $ From AIPAC? 617Blue Tuesday #14
When I go to the polls in November, I'll vote for the Democrat. End of story. Vinca Tuesday #15
+1 onenote Tuesday #21
No. No more lackeys for AIPAC nt Rob H. Tuesday #20

Celerity

(54,130 posts)
13. 80 members (15%) of the current US Congress have AIPAC as their all-time top contributor per OpenSecrets reports.
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 07:20 AM
Tuesday
https://www.trackaipac.com/shame

Figures listed reflect total spending by all pro-Israel PACs and their bundlers that we have identified.

8 Senators. 72 Representatives.
36 Republicans. 44 Democrats.


a selection of Dems and Rethugs already in the Senate and the House:

https://www.trackaipac.com/congress

Jacson6

(1,909 posts)
3. Yes, I would. The only donors a political candidate should worry about are convicted felons or an Epstein. n/t
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 11:34 PM
Monday

3_Limes

(447 posts)
16. Huh????
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 08:28 AM
Tuesday

Did you put this reply in the wrong thread? Or are you seeing something that isn't there?

tritsofme

(19,871 posts)
19. AIPAC is a group of American Jews, not "foreigners"
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 08:55 AM
Tuesday

Jews are allowed to have political beliefs, even when you disagree.

3_Limes

(447 posts)
22. Not to split hairs, but it's a group of American zionists.
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 09:19 AM
Tuesday

And not all jewish. Zionism is for the benefit of Israel, no one else. Americans are indeed free to lobby as they choose, but this lobbying is solely aimed at diverting our assets to a foreign power. Furthur, I don't count any supporters of genocide amoung the nations friends, so I must view AIPAC with a jaundiced eye.

sarisataka

(22,463 posts)
4. Will you fail to vote for a Democratic candidate if they have accepted money from AIPAC?
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 11:46 PM
Monday

In a GE?

Response to sarisataka (Reply #4)

Jack Valentino

(4,853 posts)
5. I'd have a more difficult time doing it---- but the party control of
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 12:05 AM
Tuesday

the two houses of congress are the most important considerations,
and that outweighs anything else.....





Otherwise, NO

3Hotdogs

(15,270 posts)
6. Last month's N.J. special election to fill Mikie Sherill's seat - I was getting shitloads of mail against Tom
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 12:12 AM
Tuesday

Malinowski. Turns out, it was funded by A.I.P.A.C. Tom lost, but was beaten by the candidate who is more anti-Israel than Tom.

A,I.P.A.C. is a reason I won't vote for a candidate.

Intractable

(1,933 posts)
18. If we want leaders who do not take AIPAC's money, we will need new leaders.
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 08:34 AM
Tuesday

I hold no hope that either Schumer or Jeffries will stop.

3_Limes

(447 posts)
10. It's not a litmus test, but I'd certainly avoid it if I could
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 05:31 AM
Tuesday

I really think they're a malign influence.

Norbert

(7,702 posts)
12. We have people hoping the Iran war brings end times
Tue Mar 3, 2026, 06:48 AM
Tuesday

If this is the politician's biggest transgression I'd still say it beats the hell out of what we have now. I am not ready to embrace the rapture

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you support a candi...