Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-As Trump attacks Iran, his 2017 abandonment of the Iran nuclear deal looks even worse
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, one of Barack Obamas greatest successes, is relevant anew given the ongoing conflict in Iran.
Trump sets the world on fire, so we stop talking about the Epstein Files. Let's prove him wrong!
— TheBlackPage (Woke, DEI forever against fascism) (@theblackpage.bsky.social) 2026-03-02T15:30:11.233Z
As Trump attacks Iran, his 2017 abandonment of the Iran nuclear deal looks even worse.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/as-trump-attacks-iran-his-2017-abandonment-of-the-iran-nuclear-deal-looks-even-worse
The international agreement with Iran did exactly what it set out to do: The policy dramatically curtailed Tehrans nuclear ambitions and established a rigorous system of monitoring and verification. Once the policy took effect, each of the parties agreed that the participants were holding up their end of the bargain, and Irans nuclear program was, at the time, on indefinite hold.
And then Trump took office and abandoned the policy for reasons he never explained.
In broad strokes, Obama set out to use economic sanctions to get Iran to the international negotiating table. That worked, and a breakthrough agreement eventually followed. Trump came to believe he could duplicate the strategy by abandoning the policy, restoring the old sanctions and adding new ones.
This was known as the Republicans maximum pressure campaign, and it was pursued on the assumption that Iran would inevitably return to the negotiating table and accept a new agreement. If Obamas sanctions led to a landmark deal, the argument went, then maybe Trumps sanctions could produce an even better deal.
That didnt happen. Trumps approach failed......
How Trump arrived at his decision adds insult to injury. One of my favorite stories about the Iran deal came a few months into Trumps term in the White House, when the president held a lengthy meeting with top members of his team: Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Defense Secretary James Mattis, White House national security adviser H.R. McMaster and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford. Each of the officials reportedly told Trump the same thing: It was in the United States interest to preserve the JCPOA policy.
The Republican expected his team to tell him how to get out of the international agreement, not how to stick with it. When his own foreign policy and national security advisers told him the policy was working, Trump reportedly had a bit of a meltdown.
Soon after, he abandoned the JCPOA anyway not because it was failing, but because Trump was indifferent to its success.
And then Trump took office and abandoned the policy for reasons he never explained.
In broad strokes, Obama set out to use economic sanctions to get Iran to the international negotiating table. That worked, and a breakthrough agreement eventually followed. Trump came to believe he could duplicate the strategy by abandoning the policy, restoring the old sanctions and adding new ones.
This was known as the Republicans maximum pressure campaign, and it was pursued on the assumption that Iran would inevitably return to the negotiating table and accept a new agreement. If Obamas sanctions led to a landmark deal, the argument went, then maybe Trumps sanctions could produce an even better deal.
That didnt happen. Trumps approach failed......
How Trump arrived at his decision adds insult to injury. One of my favorite stories about the Iran deal came a few months into Trumps term in the White House, when the president held a lengthy meeting with top members of his team: Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Defense Secretary James Mattis, White House national security adviser H.R. McMaster and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford. Each of the officials reportedly told Trump the same thing: It was in the United States interest to preserve the JCPOA policy.
The Republican expected his team to tell him how to get out of the international agreement, not how to stick with it. When his own foreign policy and national security advisers told him the policy was working, Trump reportedly had a bit of a meltdown.
Soon after, he abandoned the JCPOA anyway not because it was failing, but because Trump was indifferent to its success.
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog-As Trump attacks Iran, his 2017 abandonment of the Iran nuclear deal looks even worse (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
6 hrs ago
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(178,203 posts)1. There is a straight line from Trump abandoning the Iran nuclear deal nine years ago to Trump launching a war in Iran.
It seems to me we can draw a (relatively) straight line from Trump abandoning the Iran nuclear deal nine years ago to Trump launching a war in Iran.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-03-02T22:31:15.104Z