General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsniyad
(131,456 posts)LymphocyteLover
(9,693 posts)Like it still allowed Iran to enrich some nuclear material for medical and energy purposes.
The best thing about the Iran nuclear deal IMO was trying to bring Iran into the international community and persuade them to have reforms.
But NO, Israel and Saudi Arabia threw hissy fits because their great enemy wasn't being attacked.
PSPS
(15,293 posts)They may as well call it "Operation Epic Epstein Distraction"
LymphocyteLover
(9,693 posts)PSPS
(15,293 posts)Greg_In_SF
(1,191 posts)https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/06/1164291
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iran-ends-nuclear-inspection-deal-what-we-know/ar-AA1QSCwm
https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2025/08/12/iran-refusing-inspections-of-nuclear-sites-as-senior-iaea-official-concludes-visit-to-tehran/
Jose Garcia
(3,479 posts)Iran didn't dismantle it's nuclear program, but it wasn't moving it any closer to acquiring a bomb. That was not ideal, but an improvement over them developing a bomb.
Iran also got a huge financial windfall with the unfreezing of its assets. The hope was that this money would be used to raise the Iranian masses out of poverty. Instead, it was used to fund terrorism in the region.
LetMyPeopleVote
(178,203 posts)The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, one of Barack Obamas greatest successes, is relevant anew given the ongoing conflict in Iran.
Trump sets the world on fire, so we stop talking about the Epstein Files. Let's prove him wrong!
— TheBlackPage (Woke, DEI forever against fascism) (@theblackpage.bsky.social) 2026-03-02T15:30:11.233Z
As Trump attacks Iran, his 2017 abandonment of the Iran nuclear deal looks even worse.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/as-trump-attacks-iran-his-2017-abandonment-of-the-iran-nuclear-deal-looks-even-worse
And then Trump took office and abandoned the policy for reasons he never explained.
In broad strokes, Obama set out to use economic sanctions to get Iran to the international negotiating table. That worked, and a breakthrough agreement eventually followed. Trump came to believe he could duplicate the strategy by abandoning the policy, restoring the old sanctions and adding new ones.
This was known as the Republicans maximum pressure campaign, and it was pursued on the assumption that Iran would inevitably return to the negotiating table and accept a new agreement. If Obamas sanctions led to a landmark deal, the argument went, then maybe Trumps sanctions could produce an even better deal.
That didnt happen. Trumps approach failed......
How Trump arrived at his decision adds insult to injury. One of my favorite stories about the Iran deal came a few months into Trumps term in the White House, when the president held a lengthy meeting with top members of his team: Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Defense Secretary James Mattis, White House national security adviser H.R. McMaster and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford. Each of the officials reportedly told Trump the same thing: It was in the United States interest to preserve the JCPOA policy.
The Republican expected his team to tell him how to get out of the international agreement, not how to stick with it. When his own foreign policy and national security advisers told him the policy was working, Trump reportedly had a bit of a meltdown.
Soon after, he abandoned the JCPOA anyway not because it was failing, but because Trump was indifferent to its success.
liberalla
(10,997 posts)Celerity
(54,078 posts)the same for 25 House Dems
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll493.xml#N
Ashford
Boyle, Brendan F.
Cárdenas
Deutch
Engel
Frankel (FL)
Graham
Green, Gene
Hastings
Israel
Lieu, Ted
Lipinski
Lowey
Maloney, Carolyn
Meng
Napolitano
Norcross
Peterson
Rice (NY)
Scott, David
Sherman
Sinema
Sires
Vargas
Vela
