Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amaryllis

(11,206 posts)
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:21 PM Sunday

Congressional vote on War Powers was scheuled fof THIS WEEK

https://www.the50501movement.org/p/operation-epic-fury-what-happened

Lots more at link

This is about War Powers
This military operation was launched without Congressional authorization.

Top congressional leaders from both parties were notified shortly before the attack but notification is not authorization.

The War Powers Resolution requires the president to report to Congress within 48 hours when U.S. forces are introduced into hostilities. It creates a structure widely discussed but never cleanly tested under which Congress can constrain unauthorized military action.

Both chambers were already moving toward votes before the bombs fell. The bipartisan Khanna-Massie War Powers Resolution in the House, co-sponsored by progressive Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and libertarian Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) was teed up for a vote this coming week. In the Senate, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) are pushing a parallel resolution. These are procedurally privileged resolutions, meaning they can force floor action.

House Democratic leadership called the strikes unconstitutional without congressional authorization and said the administration has not articulated a plan. Jeffries told NPR’s All Things Considered that regime change has never been successful, pointing to Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan and said Democrats will force a vote on the Khanna-Massie War Powers resolution.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Chasstev365

(7,559 posts)
1. Sadly, it will go Trump's way
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:28 PM
Sunday

I'm sure all Republican Senators and Fetterman will side with criminal Trump in the Senate and a handful of Democrats and all Republicans in the House will support Trump as well.

Metaphorical

(2,621 posts)
2. I'm not so sure it will
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:39 PM
Sunday

We are the aggressors here. Let's make that abundantly clear. There are still enough people in the Senate, several GOP senators, that remember Yellow Cake that will not be swayed, especially when this was launched pre-emptively with ZERO Congressional involvement.

Celerity

(54,109 posts)
4. The Dems in the House who side with Trump will very likely be all 3 of the following:
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:52 PM
Sunday

1. Conservative and/or Centrists

2. Problem Solvers Caucus members, maybe Blue Dogs as well

3. AIPAC supported

Dem Senators (hopefully only Fetterman) who side with Trump will be No 1 and 3, as there is no Problem Solvers Senate caucus.

Celerity

(54,109 posts)
5. There may be enough defections from hawkish Democrats to doom a measure Democratic leadership plans to force to a vote
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:54 PM
Sunday
next week reining in Trump's war powers.

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/28/iran-trump-strikes-congress-democrats-israel

"I don't support the resolution, which would require us to completely abandon our allies," Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) told Axios. "The Administration returned to the practice of notifying Congress of a strike with [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio briefing the Gang of 8 last week. The strikes are an attempt to prevent further war, not to start one."

snip

"Congress was not consulted, nor was it given the opportunity to authorize the use of force. This is an unacceptable breach of its constitutional role," said Rep. Greg Meeks (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.), the hawkish chair of the center-left New Democrat Coalition, said in a statement: "Given this Administration's failure to engage Congress ... I will vote to support the War Powers Resolution coming to the floor of the House next week."

Yes, but: Other Democrats largely praised the strikes and said they simply want the administration to brief Congress moving forward:

Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) cheered the administration's "decisive action" to "defend our national security, fight terror, protect our allies, and stand with the Iranian people." "The threat posed by Tehran is real and longstanding," said Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) in a statement to Axios. "Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon." Problem Solvers Caucus co-chair Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.) said in a statement posted to X: "I agree with the President's objectives that Iran can never be allowed to obtain nuclear capabilities."

snip


plus there is this from Fetterman

3_Limes

(444 posts)
6. Like the "negotiations" that were on-going, that was part pf the cover story.
Sun Mar 1, 2026, 12:57 PM
Sunday

As Netanyahu has said, this action been in the works for a few months now.

By deception shall we wage war

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congressional vote on War...