General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSAVE has rules that States have to funnel voter data to D.C.
Another reason to call your Senator and tell them to vote "No" on the SAVE Act.
3/ Thank you to @buckscountybeacon.com for publishing my new article about the Trump-backed so-called âSave America Actâ & why it threatens election security nationwide. #ProtectOurVotes #NoOnSAVE
— Jenny Cohn (@jennycohn.bsky.social) 2026-02-26T22:42:04.581Z
Deuxcents
(26,378 posts)applegrove
(131,545 posts)Deuxcents
(26,378 posts)dweller
(28,109 posts)Its identical to House version
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/119/s3752/text
According to Govtrack , it has 0% of being enacted .
✌🏻
Deuxcents
(26,378 posts)FakeNoose
(41,116 posts)by Jennifer Cohn | February 26, 2026
A foundational rule of computer security is to never create a single point of failure, meaning a centralized system or node whose compromise would cause widespread damage. In a country that relies on computers to run elections and maintain voter rolls, that principle is crucial. No American election should depend on a centralized chokepoint that a corrupt insider, reckless contractor, or hacker could exploit or expose to disrupt voting nationwide.
Yet that is precisely what the Trump-backed so-called Save America Act would do. Buried in the bill is a little-noticed mandate requiring every state to transmit its complete voter registration rolls to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS)currently led by Kristi Noemfor screening through the agencys much-criticized SAVE voter-purge system. This would result in an unprecedented concentration of power and risk inside a single system controlled by the Trump administration.
The legislation mandates (on page 15, Section 4(b)) that within 30 days of enactment, each state shall submit its official list of registered voters to the DHS for comparison through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system, or SAVE, to identify and remove alleged noncitizens after notice and an opportunity to provide documentary proof of citizenship.
The bill does not define what constitutes adequate notice or how long voters would have to respond. In practice, those supposed protections could prove illusory. As far as I can tell, not a single Republican lawmaker has informed the public that the Save America Act would compel all 50 states to send their voter registration rolls to the DHS or that the DHS would then run the rolls through its SAVE voter purge system.
Holy shit!!!!
Lovie777
(22,542 posts)also CNN is dead so wo WB.
dalton99a
(93,358 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,468 posts)Surprised how many people believe it is private.
applegrove
(131,545 posts)why is it not in D.C. now?
Ms. Toad
(38,468 posts)But here's the link to Ohio's data - available to everyone with internet. It contains name, registration date, birth date, party affiliation, address, and which elections you've voted in (maybe even more information- its been a month or so since I checked). https://www6.ohiosos.gov/ords/f?p=VOTERFTP:HOME::::::
Feel free to download data and check.
Every state has some version of this. How it is accessed varies somewhat by state, but it is publicly available. Those lists are how party get-out-the vote efforts work, postcard campaigns, etc. That's where the data comes from - it isn't just random calls or mailings - voters who vote in the Democratic primary, for example, but don't vote regularly (which can be identified from the party affiliation and the voting record) are targeted for GOTV efforts.
applegrove
(131,545 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,468 posts)Each state collects, and makes available, slightly different data. Pretty much universal is name, address, primary ballots voted, voting record (which elections you've voted in), registration date.
You could download a county from the link I sent and check. (I downloaded my county a while ago. I'm not being evasive - I just don't remember and have already deleted the file.)
applegrove
(131,545 posts)I'll leave my op up.
Ms. Toad
(38,468 posts)I checked every few minutes and it was still downloading, so I forgot about it and went back later in the day to check on it.
Quiet Em
(2,759 posts)The DOJ is claiming authority under the National Voting Rights Act (NVRA) and Civil Rights Act of 1960 to try to seize state voter data. It is weaponizing laws that were passed to protect the vote in order to try to suppress it. While the NVRA and the Civil Rights Act do give the DOJ some limited authority to oversee states list maintenance procedures, as a federal court recently held, they do not give the DOJ the power to demand states full, unredacted voter rolls or to select voters to be kicked off the rolls.
The Constitution gives states the authority to run elections, not the federal government, and states have reliable processes to maintain voter rolls on an ongoing basis bipartisan consensus agrees on this. Nevertheless, a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sent to more than a dozen states would give the DOJ the power to handpick voters for removal, an unprecedented move that could give the agency boundless power beyond its scope, and leave hundreds or thousands of people disenfranchised.
https://protectdemocracy.org/work/dojs-attempt-to-acquire-state-voter-data-explained/
AZJonnie
(3,443 posts)a voter is removed from the roles. Sure, the Feds could get that information anytime, but this is taking their authority to conduct purges to another level.
Ms. Toad
(38,468 posts)Sending the voter information to the Feds. There have been a number of posts recently expressing outrage about the feds potentially getting their hands on voter information.
I agree that the feds have no business purging state voter rosters.
My point was solely to point out/repeat the information that voter rosters are public information, since I've seen a lot of posts recently indication people believe it is private.
AZJonnie
(3,443 posts)I knew what you meant/why you were making that particular point, friend, and I of all people love that sort of post, clarifications on underlying facts are always good
dsc
(53,361 posts)MaeScott
(966 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,468 posts)But that is not what the OP (and many others recently have specifically called out - and have been outraged about)