Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-Huckabee's Israel comments spark controversy, adding to Trump's ambassadorial woes
In recent days, weve received multiple reminders: Donald Trumps diplomats could stand to be more diplomatic.
Three U.S. ambassadors sparked three international incidents over the course of a week:
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-02-23T21:49:32.679Z
- Ambassador to Belgium Bill White
- Ambassador to France Charles Kushner
- Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee
But Huckabeeâs controversy is clearly generating the biggest backlash.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/huckabees-israel-comments-spark-controversy-adding-to-trumps-ambassadorial-woes
But in between developments in Brussels and Paris, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee sparked an even more serious controversy. The New York Times reported:
To put it mildly, many in the region were not impressed. Politico reported that the backlash included public criticism from Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the League of Arab States.
Saudi Arabias foreign ministry described Huckabees comment as extremist rhetoric and unacceptable, while Egypts foreign ministry called the remark a blatant violation of international law. The League of Arab States added, Statements of this nature extremist and lacking any sound basis serve only to inflame sentiments and stir religious and national emotions.
Over the weekend, Huckabee tried to walk back his comments, insisting that he was taken out of context. In the same interview, the ambassador, who previously served as governor of Arkansas, said Israel isnt trying to take all of that, though he added, They are asking to at least take the land that they now occupy, they now live in, they now own legitimately, and it is a safe haven for them.
Remarks by Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, prompted a storm of condemnation from Arab leaders over the weekend after he suggested that it would be fine if Israel took lands stretching across the Middle East from Egypt to Iraq.
Mr. Huckabee, an evangelical Christian and a staunch supporter of Israel, made the comments during a two-hour interview with the provocative right-wing podcaster Tucker Carlson, which aired on Friday.
To put it mildly, many in the region were not impressed. Politico reported that the backlash included public criticism from Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the League of Arab States.
Saudi Arabias foreign ministry described Huckabees comment as extremist rhetoric and unacceptable, while Egypts foreign ministry called the remark a blatant violation of international law. The League of Arab States added, Statements of this nature extremist and lacking any sound basis serve only to inflame sentiments and stir religious and national emotions.
Over the weekend, Huckabee tried to walk back his comments, insisting that he was taken out of context. In the same interview, the ambassador, who previously served as governor of Arkansas, said Israel isnt trying to take all of that, though he added, They are asking to at least take the land that they now occupy, they now live in, they now own legitimately, and it is a safe haven for them.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog-Huckabee's Israel comments spark controversy, adding to Trump's ambassadorial woes (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
4 hrs ago
OP
EYESORE 9001
(29,583 posts)1. I think he's trying to force gawd's hand, so to speak
Trying to hasten Armageddon by any means.
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,801 posts)2. I agree
trump thinks that if trump makes his evangelical base happy, then Jews should also be happy. The support of Israel by trump's evengelical base is based on their hope for an apocalypse or second coming.
Link to tweet
Politics professor Elizabeth Oldmixon explained in an interview with Vox the strange thread of Christianity that fosters an apocalyptic vision the inspires much of the right-wing support for Israel.
These are the folks who believe that there will be a millennium in the future, a golden age, where Christ reigns on Earth, [and] they believe that before Christ will return, there will be a tribulation where Christ defeats evil, she said. There will be natural disasters and wars, and perhaps an Antichrist, as the book of Revelations notes. Then at the end of that period, the people of the Mosaic covenant, including the Jews, will convert. Then after their conversion, the great millennium starts.
She continued: You have this group of people looking around for signs of the end time, and in the 20th century when Israel was founded, this was seen as a major sign. This was electrifying for that community because the gathering of all the Jews in exile to the Holy Land is a prerequisite for all of these events unfolding. So for the subset of evangelicals in the 20th century, support for Israel became a really, really important political position.
And as evangelical Christianity grew into a central part of the GOPs coalition, pro-Israel policies became cemented in the partys ideology.
The alliance between the evangelicals and pro-Israeli Jews, though, is a peculiar partnership. The Christians enter into the bargain with the assumption that, when they reach their goal of the apocalypse, any Jews will either become Christians or go to hell. But their pro-Israel allies dont seem to mind this much, perhaps because they dont believe this version of the apocalypse will ever actually come to be and as long as it is just a fantasy, their interests and those of evangelicals remain aligned.
These are the folks who believe that there will be a millennium in the future, a golden age, where Christ reigns on Earth, [and] they believe that before Christ will return, there will be a tribulation where Christ defeats evil, she said. There will be natural disasters and wars, and perhaps an Antichrist, as the book of Revelations notes. Then at the end of that period, the people of the Mosaic covenant, including the Jews, will convert. Then after their conversion, the great millennium starts.
She continued: You have this group of people looking around for signs of the end time, and in the 20th century when Israel was founded, this was seen as a major sign. This was electrifying for that community because the gathering of all the Jews in exile to the Holy Land is a prerequisite for all of these events unfolding. So for the subset of evangelicals in the 20th century, support for Israel became a really, really important political position.
And as evangelical Christianity grew into a central part of the GOPs coalition, pro-Israel policies became cemented in the partys ideology.
The alliance between the evangelicals and pro-Israeli Jews, though, is a peculiar partnership. The Christians enter into the bargain with the assumption that, when they reach their goal of the apocalypse, any Jews will either become Christians or go to hell. But their pro-Israel allies dont seem to mind this much, perhaps because they dont believe this version of the apocalypse will ever actually come to be and as long as it is just a fantasy, their interests and those of evangelicals remain aligned.
American Jews and supporters of Israel are aware of the reason why these religious nut jobs are supporting Israel. Israel needs all of the help it can get and so Jews and Israel plays on and uses these religious nut jobs. trump is confused by the fact that Jews do not share the goals of trump's evangelical base and are not appreciative of trump's efforts to appease the evangelical nut cases.
EYESORE 9001
(29,583 posts)4. I think they see only one purpose for the Jewish people in their woorld
is to serve as the catalyst for Armageddon.
leftstreet
(39,813 posts)3. DURec