General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI plan to donate my organs -- but I've taken my name off the registry
(I DID NOT WRITE THIS ARTICLE)For decades, I have encouraged friends and family to register as organ donors. As an intensive care nurse, Ive mourned patients who died needing a transplant, and Ive joined honor walks accompanying dying patients to the operating room for their life-changing donations. When I die, I want to donate my own organs and help my family find meaning in my death. But I no longer believe that being on the donor registry is the right way to accomplish those goals.
My change of heart began years ago with a patient who suffered a catastrophic health event and was being kept barely alive by machines. (For reasons of privacy, I cant identify the patient, even by sex, so I will use the pronoun they.) They could no longer consciously communicate, but they grimaced whenever they woke up and felt the tubes we had placed down their throat and in their groin, urethra, neck and wrists. Recognizing that the patient was suffering but not improving, the ICU team offered to stop our futile efforts and instead transition them to comfort care and a peaceful death. After more agonizing days, the family asked us to stop the patients suffering.
As required by law, we alerted the regional organ procurement organization. When its representative arrived, she informed the family that, because the patient had registered years ago while obtaining a drivers license, the organization was authorized to begin preparations for transplant. This meant the patient had to remain on life support for more hours or days while the procurement organization identified potential recipients, assembled the donation surgical team and coordinated timing, transportation and other factors; they also would monitor the patient and request other treatments if necessary to keep the organs viable.
The distraught family explained that the patient likely registered inadvertently, that English was a second language, that donating in this way conflicted with the patients religious beliefs and that the patient would not have wanted to be kept nominally alive without hope of recovery while their children sobbed at the bedside. The decision to withdraw life support was hard enough, the family pleaded. They asked to be left to grieve.
But the representative said she was merely notifying them not asking permission. She said the organization had the right to procure the patients organs and to continue life support in the meantime, regardless of family objection.
https://wapo.st/4aGugJx
bucolic_frolic
(54,695 posts)That is way overstepping boundaries. Next of kin owns upon death. Patient owns while alive. Family has likely P/A for medical care.
Does any organ donor program convey property rights to donor organizations when informed of imminent death? I doubt it.
Ms. Toad
(38,445 posts)The point of registering as an organ donor is for the donor to declare their intent in a way that is legally binding and family members cannot override. I want any useable organ I have left in my body when I die to go to anyone who needs it. Period. I don't care what my spouse, parents, siblings, etc. want. I want my body used to save the lives of others (heart, lungs, kidneys, liver), or to make life easier for others (skin, cornea, et.) Fortunately, al of my relatives who might have any say agree with me.
But - prior to registration via the driver's license, it was hit or miss as to whether organs were donated - even when the deceased had clear preference they had expressed to many people. Medical staff first had to ask a family in the middle of one of the toughest moments of their life about the possibility of donation. The deceased person often had not discussed the matter with family - AND - sometimes even when the family knew the wishes of the deceased but could not overcome their grief to allow the donation.
In most states, registration as an organ donor is definitive proof of the intents of the decedent and cannot be overridden by the family. It isn't a matter of ownership. It is a matter of my right to have my clearly expressed decisions about my body respected.
Dave Bowman
(6,988 posts)LudwigPastorius
(14,457 posts)...because, like in this case, that is binding as to your final wishes. Your family doesn't get a say if you've indicated beforehand how you want your death to go down.
multigraincracker
(37,284 posts)to dog that needs it.
drray23
(8,684 posts)When their family could override that wish for various reasons, religious or otherwise? Either you consent to it or revoke that consent. If it is there and you die, your family should not get a say.
Mosby
(19,421 posts)Last edited Sun Feb 22, 2026, 05:56 PM - Edit history (1)
And everyone lost:
EdmondDantes_
(1,603 posts)It doesn't sound like the family was interested in donating organs and I have very little sympathy for that position so I'm not inclined to give their account much credence in terms of being unbiased about the events.
Ms. Toad
(38,445 posts)(either heart or brain death). If they are providing palliative care, the patient was not dead, and no procurement would happen until they were dead.
So no, they were not proposing using heroic measures to save the patient's life. They were taking the necessary steps to preserve the viability of the organs of a person who had already died, and who had chosen to allow their organs to be used by others. To be viable, oxygen-enriched blood must continue circulating, but that is not life. I doubt the organ procurement group use the words "to continue life support," since that isn't what is happening after brain death - and no one even minimally trained in procurement would use that inflammatory language.
Ms. Toad
(38,445 posts)I won't have that problem, since my spouse and I are off similar minds. But at one point, my mother's desire to donate would have been overruled by my sister, had my mother's declaration not been binding.
Please don't use scare tactics of the system honoring the wishes of the decedent to discourage the most efficient means of getting your organs to people who need them.
Anything short of the registry leaves donation up to the initiative of medical people (who may not ask), relatives who may not know - or may disagree with the deceased persons wishes - or, as in the case you are citing, are too overcome with grief to allow the donation to go forward.
Full disclosure - my daughter will likely need a liver transplant (or more than one - friends with the same disease have needed as many as 5). We've also had friends die in the waiting list. But we've been organ donor for longer than she's been alive, and certainly longer than the 17 years she's had PSC
Mosby
(19,421 posts)We need to do better than that.
A driver's license is something most people over age 16 carry with them, which discloses their wishes in a way that is accessible (on their person, or via the DMV) and (in most states) cannot be overridden by family which is too wrapped up in their own grief to know or follow the wishes of the deecedent.
Frankly, I think an opt out system would be better. But since that isn't likely to happen, this opt in system via a document which most adults have is an excellent alternative.