Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:19 PM Wednesday

WSJ: Billionaires' Low Taxes Are Becoming A Problem For the Economy

When you've lost the Wall Street Journal..... The article goes on to say that tax avoidance is becoming not only an economic problem but a political one.

Listen up, Dems. Even the WSJ is recognizing that this can't continue. Tie all Rs to this topic at evry opportunity!

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WSJ: Billionaires' Low Taxes Are Becoming A Problem For the Economy (Original Post) senseandsensibility Wednesday OP
It's getting like France in 1789 and is simply unsustainable. Chasstev365 Wednesday #1
Roll back the Reagan/Bush/Tramp poli-junkie Wednesday #2
No one ever talks about those anymore leftstreet Wednesday #3
Those tax cuts + the wars account for pretty much the entire FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #12
Reagan even got a Democratic House to vote for them MichMan Thursday #27
Absolutely. I don't understand why Dems have such trouble saying this out loud. Bluetus Wednesday #4
I have heard some of that senseandsensibility Wednesday #5
because saying this will immediately result in a primary candidate funded with 100s of millions of dollars DBoon Wednesday #6
There will definitely be pushback senseandsensibility Wednesday #7
Get in office first cate94 Wednesday #8
Campaign money is overrated Bluetus Wednesday #22
No lie found irisblue Wednesday #9
The epstein-class must contribute more to society. talking-liberally Wednesday #10
Yes, and very very few will willingly do their part FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #11
Some people noticed that a long time ago. FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #13
Agreed, but when even the WSJ says it senseandsensibility Wednesday #15
Shakespeare Amended: lastlib Wednesday #14
No violence senseandsensibility Wednesday #17
There is also "Eat the Rich". madinmaryland Wednesday #21
But during the Occupy Wallstreet, the top Dems and GOP said such talk was akin to class warfare LiberalArkie Wednesday #16
Indeed they did, but Occupy was 16 years ago. BannonsLiver Thursday #29
16 years ago, but we essentially have the same Democratic Party leaders. Still the same DLC. LiberalArkie Thursday #30
File Under "Well, Duh"! ProfessorGAC Wednesday #18
If there's one thing I hope Dems have learned in the past few years senseandsensibility Wednesday #19
Yeah, I Buy That ProfessorGAC Wednesday #20
What galls me is, the Repuglykans are a "one-trick horse's ass"..... lastlib Wednesday #23
The WSJ news articles have always shown decent journalism Wednesdays Wednesday #24
Yes, good point senseandsensibility Thursday #28
Begin by taxing the Murdochs Wicked Blue Thursday #25
They're just now figuring this out? Initech Thursday #26

FoxNewsSucks

(11,632 posts)
12. Those tax cuts + the wars account for pretty much the entire
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 02:47 PM
Wednesday

national debt.

The republicons who scream about debt and deficit, and mock "tax & spend" Democrats are nothing more than "borrow & spend" hypocrites who caused nearly all our debt.

And they want to steal our SS fund, because they damn sure don't want to pay enough taxes to cover their debt.

MichMan

(16,959 posts)
27. Reagan even got a Democratic House to vote for them
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 12:29 PM
Thursday

They could have stopped everything he did

Bluetus

(2,575 posts)
4. Absolutely. I don't understand why Dems have such trouble saying this out loud.
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:38 PM
Wednesday

Name one popular Billionaire.

Bill Gates used to be, because of his philanthropy, but it is abundantly clear he is deep in the Epstein swamp, so F that guy.

Warren Buffet? But Buffet has been advocating for higher taxes on billionaires all along.

Musk, Theil, Leo, Epstein, Trump, Ellison, Euline, Bezos, Zuckerberg? These people are all despicable. Dems should have no trouble attacking them.

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)
5. I have heard some of that
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:41 PM
Wednesday

but it needs to be a central message, not just a talking point that a few Dems spout occasionally.

DBoon

(24,856 posts)
6. because saying this will immediately result in a primary candidate funded with 100s of millions of dollars
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 01:13 PM
Wednesday

The billionaire class wants unquestioned and complete control.

They reject any form of democracy

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)
7. There will definitely be pushback
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 02:06 PM
Wednesday

but really, what's the alternative? We can't allow this to continue.

Bluetus

(2,575 posts)
22. Campaign money is overrated
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 05:38 PM
Wednesday

It matters but we see all sorts of candidates winning when they are out spent 10 to one.

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)
15. Agreed, but when even the WSJ says it
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 02:51 PM
Wednesday

I think that is a sign that the Dems need to get LOUD about this. It is no longer just a "liberal" issue. Independents agree, and even Rs. That's a sign that it's time to push hard and put the Rs on the defense for once.

lastlib

(27,913 posts)
14. Shakespeare Amended:
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 02:49 PM
Wednesday

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the billionaires."

Well, if we can't kill 'em, TAX the ever-lovin' FUCK out of 'em.

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)
17. No violence
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 02:59 PM
Wednesday

I know you're not suggesting that. But the good news is that I really believe that all we need is to make sure that the public believes that we are on the side of the regular people, not the billionaires. And that should be an easy case to make.

BannonsLiver

(20,363 posts)
29. Indeed they did, but Occupy was 16 years ago.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 02:59 PM
Thursday

Might be different now, at least on the blue team.

LiberalArkie

(19,577 posts)
30. 16 years ago, but we essentially have the same Democratic Party leaders. Still the same DLC.
Thu Feb 19, 2026, 03:49 PM
Thursday

ProfessorGAC

(76,326 posts)
18. File Under "Well, Duh"!
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 03:15 PM
Wednesday

Particularly galling is that 2 of those big cuts happened when the economy was roaring and didn't need any stimulus.
So, they were not only economically harmful, but were wholly unnecessary.

senseandsensibility

(24,587 posts)
19. If there's one thing I hope Dems have learned in the past few years
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 04:07 PM
Wednesday

it's that what we think is common knowledge is not. For the low info voters, this is probably news to them. We need to lather, rinse, repeat, over and over again. That's what the Rs do.

ProfessorGAC

(76,326 posts)
20. Yeah, I Buy That
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 05:14 PM
Wednesday

I think we inadequately pushed back against the Budh & Trump cuts.
The average person sees a buck & a half and the rich person get 2 grand. Somehow we failed to reduce the mass popularity of those "wonderful" tax cuts

lastlib

(27,913 posts)
23. What galls me is, the Repuglykans are a "one-trick horse's ass".....
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 07:03 PM
Wednesday

When the economy is bad, they say we need tax cuts for rich people to stimulate the economy*.
When the economy is good, they say we need tax cuts for rich people because the big bad guvmint is spending too much.
So really, their whole shtick is about cutting taxes for rich people just to make the rich people richer, and commensurately make the working class poorer. And when we call for the rich people to pay more taxes, they scream "class warfare" at the top of their dirty lungs. The reality is that THEY are the ones committing class warfare every time they get a cut.

(*what we find out is that rich people don't spend their tax cuts; they invest in corporate stock buybacks to further enrich themselves and their other rich friends, so the economy doesn't get stimulated by spending.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WSJ: Billionaires' Low Ta...