Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(54,898 posts)
Sun Feb 15, 2026, 10:59 AM Sunday

This Is What Destroying the Vaccine Market Looks Like

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/this-is-what-destroying-the-vaccine-market-looks-like-moderna-flu-prasad-fda

THE VACCINE MAKER MODERNA decided this past week to tell the world about bad news it had received from the federal government.

A potentially groundbreaking vaccine for seasonal flu that the Massachusetts-based company had developed would not be getting approval from regulators. In fact, it wasn’t even getting formal consideration, Moderna announced in a Tuesday press release, because officials were refusing to accept the application.

This is not the type of development you would normally expect a pharmaceutical company to broadcast. But that’s because there’s nothing normal about the way the federal government is behaving in this saga—or, for that matter, how the government has been behaving ever since President Donald Trump put anti-vaccination crusader Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in charge of America’s public health.

Moderna’s flu shot, which uses mRNA technology made famous during the COVID-19 pandemic, is the product of a lengthy research and development process that goes back years. Along the way, Moderna scientists consulted directly with officials at the Food and Drug Administration, the agency inside of Kennedy’s department (Health and Human Services) that is responsible for reviewing and approving vaccines.

Such consultation is normal. And a major focus of the discussion between the company and the regulators was how Moderna should test the new shot to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness. There was some back and forth—again, pretty routine—but ultimately the FDA agreed that Moderna’s design for a trial was “acceptable,” according to communication Moderna cited in its press release.

*snip*
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Is What Destroying the Vaccine Market Looks Like (Original Post) Nevilledog Sunday OP
Is pootin happy yet? SheltieLover Sunday #1
... Solly Mack Sunday #2
Trump and RFK, Jr. Want You and Me to Die. MineralMan Sunday #3
FDA reverses course, will review Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #4

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,634 posts)
4. FDA reverses course, will review Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 12:59 PM
Wednesday

Moderna revised its application following the FDA's surprise decision to not review the flu shot.

A bit of good news this morning: FDA reverses course, will review Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine

www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...

Laura Haynes👩‍🔬⚾️🐾💙 (@drlaurahaynes.bsky.social) 2026-02-18T14:13:46.545Z

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-reverses-course-will-review-modernas-mrna-flu-vaccine-rcna259531

Moderna said on Wednesday the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has agreed to review its influenza vaccine, reversing an earlier decision to reject the application, after the company made modifications.

The reversal, which comes just a week after the FDA’s surprise decision to not review the company’s experimental flu vaccine application, lifted shares of the vaccine maker more than 3% before the bell.

The FDA has accepted Moderna’s revised approach seeking full approval for the shot for adults aged between 50 and 64, and accelerated approval for those aged 65 and above, the company said, adding that it will also conduct a post-marketing study in older adults.

The mRNA technology used in Moderna’s and most other Covid shots, credited with saving millions of lives, comes with a shift in the national health policy under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time anti-vaccine activist who has been particularly critical of mRNA vaccines.

The regulator had defended its initial decision, saying the company should have given a higher-strength vaccine to older patients in the control arm of its trial.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Is What Destroying t...