General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Don Lemon indictment: Video appears to contradict key claims
Video footage appears to contradict key aspects of a federal indictments descriptions of former CNN anchor Don Lemons actions at a protest last month inside a church in St. Paul, Minnesota, according to a review by The Washington Post.
Lemon, another independent journalist and several protesters are all charged with the same two criminal counts. They are accused of conspiring to deprive congregants of their religious rights and of interfering with access to a place of worship.
The Jan. 29 indictment calls the nine defendants agitators and says they entered the Church in a coordinated takeover-style attack. In multiple instances it describes the alleged conduct of the two journalists and the protesters collectively. It does not characterize Lemon or Georgia Fort as journalists, though it notes that he was live-streaming video to his online program The Don Lemon Show and that Fort, acting separately, conducted an interview at one point.
-snip-
Experts said that if Lemon was operating as a journalist during the Jan. 18 protest at Cities Church in St. Paul rather than as a participant that could undermine accusations that he was part of a conspiracy or that he intended to interfere with protected rights. During the approximately 45 minutes Lemon live-streamed at the church, he conducted interviews and repeatedly identified himself as a reporter, while also voicing sympathy for the protesters cause.
https://wapo.st/3ZwiMDs
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,433 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(177,433 posts)A motion from Don Lemon and Georgia Fort in Minnesota is the latest legal action questioning the presumption of regularity historically granted to the government.
Trump DOJ goes into its Don Lemon case without a key tool: The courtsâ trust - MS NOW
— (@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-02-17T21:45:47.083Z
apple.news/AuiMKRZdLS_C...
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/don-lemon-georgia-fort-charges-minnesota-doj-trump
The extraordinary set of events that led to this indictment reveals a significant risk that the government misstated key facts or elements of the offenses charged during its presentation to the grand jury, as it has already done so publicly, calling into question the validity of the indictment, the motion argued. It said Lemon and Fort were indicted after attending a church protest solely in their capacities as members of the press and that they were charged only after courts rejected warrants for their arrest, Trump pressured the Justice Department and career prosecutors refused to be involved.
Maintaining that their concerns about government misconduct arent abstract or speculative, the defendants pointed to what they called a small but growing body of caselaw involving the precise situation we see here the government engaging in highly unusual conduct simultaneous to political pressure to bring charges, and misstatements of law at the highest levels of government.....
More broadly, they argued that the administration isnt entitled to the presumption of regularity, a legal concept that assumes government officials act properly. Its worth questioning the presumption as a general matter but especially in this administration, whose atypical actions have drawn atypical scrutiny from judges, including in other recent cases in Minnesota.
In light of the foregoing, the grand jury process in question here is not entitled to any presumption of regularity by the Court. Likewise, it should not be afforded the traditional secrecy that accompanies grand juries operating in the normal course, Lemon and Fort argued in their motion, filed Friday.
They were charged with conspiring against the right of religious freedom at a place of worship and with injuring, intimidating and interfering with the exercise of the right of religious freedom at a place of worship. They have pleaded not guilty.
The DOJ will have an opportunity to respond to the motion. But due to the Trump governments behavior over the past year, it may be going into this case with a disadvantage or, perhaps more precisely, without the advantage it would have in normal times. Although if we were in normal times, this case might not exist.