Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(134,215 posts)
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 04:08 PM Friday

The Don Lemon indictment: Video appears to contradict key claims

Video footage appears to contradict key aspects of a federal indictment’s descriptions of former CNN anchor Don Lemon’s actions at a protest last month inside a church in St. Paul, Minnesota, according to a review by The Washington Post.

Lemon, another independent journalist and several protesters are all charged with the same two criminal counts. They are accused of conspiring to deprive congregants of their religious rights and of interfering with access to a place of worship.

The Jan. 29 indictment calls the nine defendants “agitators” and says they “entered the Church in a coordinated takeover-style attack.” In multiple instances it describes the alleged conduct of the two journalists and the protesters collectively. It does not characterize Lemon or Georgia Fort as journalists, though it notes that he was live-streaming video to his online program “The Don Lemon Show” and that Fort, acting separately, conducted an interview at one point.

-snip-

Experts said that if Lemon was operating as a journalist during the Jan. 18 protest at Cities Church in St. Paul — rather than as a participant — that could undermine accusations that he was part of a conspiracy or that he intended to interfere with protected rights. During the approximately 45 minutes Lemon live-streamed at the church, he conducted interviews and repeatedly identified himself as a reporter, while also voicing sympathy for the protesters’ cause.

https://wapo.st/3ZwiMDs

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Don Lemon indictment: Video appears to contradict key claims (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Friday OP
Statement from Don Lemon LetMyPeopleVote Friday #1
Deadline Legal Blog-Trump DOJ goes into its Don Lemon case without a key tool: the courts' trust LetMyPeopleVote 1 hr ago #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,433 posts)
2. Deadline Legal Blog-Trump DOJ goes into its Don Lemon case without a key tool: the courts' trust
Wed Feb 18, 2026, 06:11 PM
1 hr ago

A motion from Don Lemon and Georgia Fort in Minnesota is the latest legal action questioning the “presumption of regularity” historically granted to the government.

Trump DOJ goes into its Don Lemon case without a key tool: The courts’ trust - MS NOW

apple.news/AuiMKRZdLS_C...

(@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-02-17T21:45:47.083Z

https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/don-lemon-georgia-fort-charges-minnesota-doj-trump

A motion from Lemon and Fort raises that bold claim in seeking disclosure of the secret grand jury proceedings against them. Their court filing underscores that there’s no good reason to presume good faith on the government’s part in President Donald Trump’s second term — and that there’s good reason to presume the opposite.

“The extraordinary set of events that led to this indictment reveals a significant risk that the government misstated key facts or elements of the offenses charged during its presentation to the grand jury, as it has already done so publicly, calling into question the validity of the indictment,” the motion argued. It said Lemon and Fort were indicted after attending a church protest “solely in their capacities as members of the press” and that they were charged only after courts rejected warrants for their arrest, Trump pressured the Justice Department and career prosecutors refused to be involved.

Maintaining that their concerns about government misconduct aren’t “abstract or speculative,” the defendants pointed to what they called “a small but growing body of caselaw involving the precise situation we see here — the government engaging in highly unusual conduct simultaneous to political pressure to bring charges, and misstatements of law at the highest levels of government.”....

More broadly, they argued that the administration isn’t entitled to the “presumption of regularity,” a legal concept that assumes government officials act properly. It’s worth questioning the presumption as a general matter but especially in this administration, whose atypical actions have drawn atypical scrutiny from judges, including in other recent cases in Minnesota.

“In light of the foregoing, the grand jury process in question here is not entitled to any presumption of regularity by the Court. Likewise, it should not be afforded the traditional secrecy that accompanies grand juries operating in the normal course,” Lemon and Fort argued in their motion, filed Friday.

They were charged with conspiring against the right of religious freedom at a place of worship and with injuring, intimidating and interfering with the exercise of the right of religious freedom at a place of worship. They have pleaded not guilty.

The DOJ will have an opportunity to respond to the motion. But due to the Trump government’s behavior over the past year, it may be going into this case with a disadvantage — or, perhaps more precisely, without the advantage it would have in normal times. Although if we were in normal times, this case might not exist.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Don Lemon indictment:...