You are entitled to your opinion and I am sympathetic to it, but we are way, way too early to be excluding Democrats.

and then pledge to support whoever is the nominee.

I think he's a little over-produced for this set of circumstances. It's great that he's in the mix, but I think the one out in front will be who promotes justice, reparations, repair and renewal. No coddling of the white supremacist fascism that got us here. No centering of racist grievance in our legislative compromises. No compromising with racist fascists. Fire every trump crony. It's never too early to promote justice.

thing!! Nothing can change unless we take back the White House and I think we need to be pragmatic and keep the focus on winning!!!

Fetterman/Sinema

I get it. He kinda the flip side of Vance.

(oh shit)

A colleague described him as a quintessential "California man". That his demeanor and politics are entirely authentic, but he is also extraordinarily media aware and somewhat vain.

He, unlike Fetterman, Sinema, Manchin, etc. can meld humor and to his scorn of Trump, which is novel amongst Democrats.

that when money is in the offing, he seems willing to help billionaires/corporations to the detriment of the non-rich public.

Fundraising his been instrumental to Democratic leadership to our woe since 1992.

The strategy of building campaigns around money people never works for us, and we've seen grassroots fundraising being a potent narrative driver.

Newsom has something, though, which is free media. Trump took advantage of it, and Newsom will wet his beak too.

I would really prefer someone else.

Some may even saddle up to it.

Kimberly Guilfoyle.

Even outright lies will be amplified in any opposition "research."

Said Guilfoyle in 2020, one engagement and ambassadorial posting ago.