General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski comes out against Trump's election bill, with a warning to her party
WASHINGTON Sen. Lisa Murkowski became the first Republican senator to speak out against the SAVE Act, a sweeping election bill backed by President Donald Trump that would require proof of citizenship to vote nationwide.
In doing so, the Alaskan reminded her colleagues on Tuesday that they roundly claimed to oppose new federal election laws as recently as Joe Bidens presidency.
When Democrats attempted to advance sweeping election reform legislation in 2021, Republicans were unanimous in opposition because it would have federalized elections, something we have long opposed, Murkowski said in a statement. Now, Im seeing proposals such as the SAVE Act and MEGA that would effectively do just that. Once again, I do not support these efforts.
Not only does the U.S. Constitution clearly provide states the authority to regulate the times, places, and manner of holding federal elections, but one-size-fits-all mandates from Washington, D.C., seldom work in places like Alaska, she added.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/gop-sen-lisa-murkowski-comes-trumps-election-bill-warning-party-rcna258353
Fiendish Thingy
(22,535 posts)dweller
(28,027 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(22,535 posts)That EO doesnt remove state control from administration, tallying or certifying of elections.
dweller
(28,027 posts)Unless she was referring to For the People Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_the_People_Act
And then the repugs filibustered it in the senate
So its just another lie
✌🏻
hatrack
(64,564 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(177,271 posts)The original SAVE Act was an indefensible step backward, and the revised version is worse. It passed the Republican-led House anyway.
Targeting elections, House GOP advances the SAVE America Act, a solution in search of a problem www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
— Philly Joe (@joehick58.bsky.social) 2026-02-12T00:19:32.092Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/save-act-elections-house-republicans-trump-johnson-voter-id
The GOP duo pitched legislation that would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. The absurdity of watching two notorious election deniers pretend to be deeply concerned with the integrity of elections was a detail the political world was apparently supposed to overlook.....
The original SAVE Act was an indefensible step backward, and the revised version is worse:
All Americans would be required to prove their U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.
Voters would be required under federal law to present identification when casting ballots in person or by mail, even in states that do not have voter ID laws.
Republicans are eyeing new restrictions on Americans who want to vote by mail.
The proposal is a classic example of a solution in search of a problem. Republicans have spent years desperately searching for evidence of systemic fraud in vote-by-mail systems, for example, and theyve come up empty. The same is true about the supposed need for voter ID laws: In reality, there is simply no national scourge of people trying to cast ballots while pretending to be someone else.....
Whats more, as The Associated Press reported, state elections officials from both parties have expressed practical concerns about how these costly proposed procedures would be implemented and paid for. The same article added: Voting rights groups have said married women who have changed their name could have trouble registering under the SAVE Act because their birth certificate lists their maiden name.
Despite all of this, the bill passed the House anyway.
The proposal now heads to the Republican-led Senate, where it will need to overcome a 60-vote threshold, which seems exceedingly unlikely. That said, Politico reported this week that GOP leaders are so desperate to fundamentally alter how Americans vote that theyre exploring potential procedural changes that would make it possible to pass the regressive legislation, despite existing cloture rules.
There is no evidence of the type of voter fraud that the SAVE Act would prevent. It takes time and effort to get US citizens to go vote and so non-citizens are not going to risk arrest just to vote. The GOP and other groups have been looking for years for proof of non-citizens voting and have not found any such proof. The SAVE Act is a solution looking for a problem.