Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump is openly cashing in on the presidency
Trump is openly cashing in on the presidency
The multibillion-dollar profiteering is snowballing in an anything-goes presidency
By Heather Digby Parton
Columnist
Published February 3, 2026 9:25AM (EST)
(Salon) Donald Trump announced last week that he is suing the Internal Revenue Service for $10 billion because a contractor leaked his tax returns. This isnt the first time the president has sued the federal government. He has already filed claims against the Justice Department for $230 million over the investigations into Russian collusion and the stolen classified documents. In each of these cases, it will be up to the agencies, which he oversees, whether to settle with him. Gosh, I wonder what hell decide?
When asked about this curious arrangement over the weekend, Trump told the press, Im supposed to work out a settlement with myself We could make it a substantial amount, nobody would care, because its gonna go to numerous, very good charities. Evidently, American taxpayers are going to have to pay for yet more of Trumps grievances and give him what will almost certainly be a nice tax write-off. Thats assuming these very good charities arent along the lines of his defunct Trump Foundation, for which he was sued by the state of New York for funneling funds to himself and barred from ever running a charity in the state again. onald Trump announced last week that he is suing the Internal Revenue Service for $10 billion because a contractor leaked his tax returns. This isnt the first time the president has sued the federal government. He has already filed claims against the Justice Department for $230 million over the investigations into Russian collusion and the stolen classified documents. In each of these cases, it will be up to the agencies, which he oversees, whether to settle with him. Gosh, I wonder what hell decide?
....(snip)....
When the Times asked him why he was openly doing deals in his second term after largely adhering to long-held norms against conflicts of interest in his first, Trump wasnt wrong in his response: Because I found out that nobody cared. Im allowed to. (He went on to claim that he previously prohibited his kids from doing business and didnt get any credit for it, and then he saw what went on with Biden. Trump also noted that he has a very honest family.)
....(snip)....
Now he is openly fast-tracking pardons, handing them out to everyone from drug kingpins to personal business associates willing to pay top dollar to lobbyists who will advocate for them. The going rate is reportedly set at a million dollars. The money mostly goes to the middle men, but one can assume it gets spread around in various ways. ..............(more)
https://www.salon.com/2026/02/03/trump-familys-4-billion-graft-shows-no-signs-of-stopping/
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump is openly cashing in on the presidency (Original Post)
marmar
Tuesday
OP
MaddowBlog-Previously undisclosed UAE stake in Trump company sparks new controversy
LetMyPeopleVote
Wednesday
#2
Irish_Dem
(80,392 posts)1. He will take the country down to the studs.
I wonder if he will leave us with anything.
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,617 posts)2. MaddowBlog-Previously undisclosed UAE stake in Trump company sparks new controversy
The latest revelations led one Democratic senator to argue, Foreign countries are bribing our president to sell out the American people.
The latest revelations led one Democratic senator to argue, âForeign countries are bribing our president to sell out the American peopleâ -Sen. Chris Van Hollen (MD). Previously undisclosed UAE stake in tRump company sparks new controversy.
— Petisia (@petisia.bsky.social) 2026-02-02T20:55:11.978Z
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/previously-undisclosed-uae-stake-in-trump-company-sparks-new-controversy
Controversies soon followed. Trump faced awkward questions, for example, about the curious group of business partners with whom he had linked arms. A year later, in one of the most scandalous presidential pardons in American history, Trump pardoned Changpeng Zhao, the convicted founder of the crypto exchange Binance, which just so happened to have struck a lucrative business deal with World Liberty Financial.
The broader story, however, hasnt hit rock bottom just yet. The Wall Street Journal reported:
The deal, the Journal added, marked something unprecedented in American politics: a foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming U.S. presidents company which, at the time, had no products......
In the presidents first term, there was considerable interest in the emoluments clause and foreign interests renting rooms at Trump-owned properties. In his second term, the seeming corruption is spectacularly worse.
.....There are a few elements to this that are worth keeping in mind. First, never in American history has a foreign country bought a stake in a company owned by the American president, even as the president negotiated foreign policy matters with the other country. The idea that Joe Biden did exactly the same thing is plainly ridiculous.
Second, if Trump had been completely transparent about all of this, the Journals reporting would have been old news. It wasnt because all of this had been secret from the public up until now.
And third, lets not overlook the fact that Blanche was offered an opportunity to offer his best possible defense of the president. Evidently, he couldnt think of anything persuasive.
I guess thats not too surprising, given how difficult it is to defend the indefensible.
The broader story, however, hasnt hit rock bottom just yet. The Wall Street Journal reported:
Four days before Donald Trumps inauguration last year, lieutenants to an Abu Dhabi royal secretly signed a deal with the Trump family to purchase a 49% stake in their fledgling cryptocurrency venture for half a billion dollars, according to company documents and people familiar with the matter. The buyers would pay half up front, steering $187 million to Trump family entities.
The deal with World Liberty Financial, which hasnt previously been reported, was signed by Eric Trump, the presidents son. At least $31 million was also slated to flow to entities affiliated with the family of Steve Witkoff, a World Liberty co-founder who weeks earlier had been named U.S. envoy to the Middle East, the documents said.
The deal, the Journal added, marked something unprecedented in American politics: a foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming U.S. presidents company which, at the time, had no products......
In the presidents first term, there was considerable interest in the emoluments clause and foreign interests renting rooms at Trump-owned properties. In his second term, the seeming corruption is spectacularly worse.
STEPHANOPOULOS: A foreign government official taking a major ownership stake in an incoming president's company -- how do you respond to those who say this is a serious conflict of interest?
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-02-01T16:25:57.314Z
BLANCHE (lying): The Biden family did the same thing
.....There are a few elements to this that are worth keeping in mind. First, never in American history has a foreign country bought a stake in a company owned by the American president, even as the president negotiated foreign policy matters with the other country. The idea that Joe Biden did exactly the same thing is plainly ridiculous.
Second, if Trump had been completely transparent about all of this, the Journals reporting would have been old news. It wasnt because all of this had been secret from the public up until now.
And third, lets not overlook the fact that Blanche was offered an opportunity to offer his best possible defense of the president. Evidently, he couldnt think of anything persuasive.
I guess thats not too surprising, given how difficult it is to defend the indefensible.