Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gulliver

(13,781 posts)
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 12:52 PM Yesterday

Democrats Have to Be More Than the Anti-Trump Party

The moment is ripe to deal a debilitating blow to Trumpism and the MAGA movement.

Right-wing populism is staggering. Democrats are not only favored to win back control of the House, but they also have a long-shot chance of taking over the Senate.

President Trump’s favorability ratings on both his job performance and the issues that propelled him into the White House have nose-dived. The ICE and Border Patrol killings in Minnesota have focused public attention on the dangers of autocratic rule. His second term has been dominated by a bizarre combination of narcissism, corruption and a lurching foreign policy.

But if Democrats are to succeed in excising the Trump malignancy from the body politic, their party faces a major hurdle: public distrust, if not downright animosity.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/opinion/democrats-trump-midterms-future.html

Imo, this is the way to win.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats Have to Be More Than the Anti-Trump Party (Original Post) gulliver Yesterday OP
DURec leftstreet Yesterday #1
we are the anti-Trump party bigtree Yesterday #2
Sure. But apparently, it IS hard for people. Telling people Maru Kitteh Yesterday #5
no, no, you're right bigtree Yesterday #9
The problem with that is ... PBC_Democrat Yesterday #6
two parties bigtree Yesterday #10
Third option--don't vote. CrispyQ Yesterday #33
What do you want them to say Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #29
It is not a true binary system. People can (and do, in staggering numbers) choose a 3rd option, ie not to vote. Celerity Yesterday #11
Don't forget gops fuckery SunImp Yesterday #17
Still one of the parties will win Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #30
Trump is 2-1 with us using that approach EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #13
to me, the weirdness is the disconnect bigtree Yesterday #14
So if you're unwilling to listen to other perspectives, it's kind of hard to blame others for not doing the same EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #21
you misunderstand bigtree Yesterday #23
I'm going to ask how I misunderstood this EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #40
I'm not a Democratic spokesman bigtree Yesterday #41
+1 leftstreet Yesterday #24
Which National Leaders Flew Into MN To Participate In The Protest? Rendville Yesterday #3
Kamala Harris is a private citizen SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #7
not one I recall. maybe walz told national dems to stay away nt msongs Yesterday #26
Pro workers TheFarseer Yesterday #4
They didn't care Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #32
Being the anti nazi party SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #8
We are, or should be Jilly_in_VA Yesterday #12
Democrats ARE more than an anti-Trump party mcar Yesterday #15
"Anti-Trump" Adults in charge. It's a simple message.. or it should be. LeftinOH Yesterday #16
Message "anti-establishment" candidates use when running against Democrats. betsuni Yesterday #18
Lower housing costs, lower cost of food, Melon Yesterday #19
Kamala Harris' top priorities: housing ($25,000 for first-time house buyers) food cost (ban on price gouging) betsuni Yesterday #25
exactly, this is a canard bigtree Yesterday #42
Clinton: Shrunk deficit. Gore: Social Security lock box, climate. Obama: ACA. Biden: He's FDR! betsuni 23 hrs ago #46
I don't know. Being the pro-Nazi, anti-Democracy, "Fuck your Feelings" party maxrandb Yesterday #20
Here we go with this shit again. W_HAMILTON Yesterday #22
what one stands for might be more persuasive than what one opposes? nt msongs Yesterday #27
I Think It Is ESSENTIAL To Tell About The Opponent! After all,... ColoringFool Yesterday #37
MAGAts Voted Against Kamala. ColoringFool Yesterday #39
There are sooooo many ways.... returnee Yesterday #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Yesterday #31
Democrats put out their economic plan Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #34
Message auto-removed Name removed Yesterday #35
why should anyone parse their fear of this government bigtree Yesterday #43
Kamala/Walz Was Way More Than Anti-Trump. ColoringFool Yesterday #36
If we can't beat these sorry bastards it speaks more about the American electorate walkingman Yesterday #38
Possibly but running as policy wonks drray23 Yesterday #44
I'm getting sick & tired of this " long-shot of taking the Senate" bullshit KS Toronado Yesterday #45

bigtree

(93,617 posts)
2. we are the anti-Trump party
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 12:56 PM
Yesterday

...in a binary system of elections where one party dependably produces for the people, and the other is either trying to own or kill you.

This shouldn't be hard fo people.

Maru Kitteh

(31,359 posts)
5. Sure. But apparently, it IS hard for people. Telling people
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:04 PM
Yesterday

they should get it, or they should know, or what they should be feeling and thinking . . . that doesn’t work. That much we do know.


bigtree

(93,617 posts)
9. no, no, you're right
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:20 PM
Yesterday

...they have to actually experience the terror so many of us have been experiencing at the hands of armed and armored law enforcement for decades before they make the leap of logic that the binding they intend for the ones they have antipathies for are being fitted by their government for them, as well.

It's not just Democrats out there that are losing their country and the things they've likely relied on from their government all of their lives which are now being callously stripped away.

And this thing some people have about expecting Democrats to tell them is really something. When did they start listening? We've never stopped telling them the way things are.

They have to experience the bottom before they think about standing up.


PBC_Democrat

(449 posts)
6. The problem with that is ...
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:10 PM
Yesterday

we convince people not to vote for Trump -- but we don't necessarily convince them to vote for the Democrat.

CrispyQ

(40,769 posts)
33. Third option--don't vote.
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 05:00 PM
Yesterday

That's not an option for me & probably not for you, but a lot of people need to be motivated or inspired to vote. Just cuz they vote against Trump doesn't mean they'll vote dem when he's gone, & without good dem majorities not much will change, which feeds the 'both parties are the same' narrative.

Keepthesoulalive

(2,164 posts)
29. What do you want them to say
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:51 PM
Yesterday

Trump lied to every group that would listen and they believed him the 2nd time. You must also break through the propaganda arm, mainstream media and billionaires. What do you want in a 2 party system?

Celerity

(53,924 posts)
11. It is not a true binary system. People can (and do, in staggering numbers) choose a 3rd option, ie not to vote.
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:25 PM
Yesterday
Nearly 90 million of eligible American voters did not vote in 2024, which is more than the number of people who voted for Trump (77,302,580) or voted for Harris (75,017,613).

SunImp

(2,646 posts)
17. Don't forget gops fuckery
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 02:16 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Tue Jan 27, 2026, 06:06 PM - Edit history (1)

They tossed 30+million people off voter rolls between 2014-2018, legislated strict voter id laws, enacted criminal penalties for ballot box drives & civil liabilities for poll workers, tightened the time frame for ballot counting, restricted mail in voting, & closed polling locations. After years of voter disenfranchisement & gerrymandering many of these people affected by the gops Bs just gave up

Keepthesoulalive

(2,164 posts)
30. Still one of the parties will win
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:56 PM
Yesterday

3rd choice leads to the Same outcome. I’m not liking people being murdered by the federal government.

EdmondDantes_

(1,462 posts)
13. Trump is 2-1 with us using that approach
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:37 PM
Yesterday

It literally took a world wide pandemic for us to win. Sure Trump won't be running again, but he's hardly the only far right nationalist. We will need to keep fighting that. We used to have FDR's New Deal, LBJ's Great Society, things that spoke through action of our political north stars. Even Obama had Yes We Can and The Audacity of Hope which while not as legislatively grounded as FDR or LBJ (for multiple reasons), spoke to our aspirations as a party.

bigtree

(93,617 posts)
14. to me, the weirdness is the disconnect
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:44 PM
Yesterday

...and this idea that I need to do something more to tell people or convince them of the danger they're experiencing right now.

They didn't listen when we warned them every way possible, and I'm not one to argue this crap to that we didn't say something or the other to make it clear enough for anyone to understand.

They didn't want to listen or understand. Now, maybe they do. But I'll not be told that we didn't say enough, or said the wrong thing to someone.

That's counter to the reality that I live everyday in my 65 years as a human being on this planet.

EdmondDantes_

(1,462 posts)
21. So if you're unwilling to listen to other perspectives, it's kind of hard to blame others for not doing the same
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 03:00 PM
Yesterday

I literally explained a difference in how we've connected in the past, compared to now, and your response was effectively I won't listen to that.

It's always incumbent on someone making an argument to find a way to reach the audience. As someone who has coached multiple disciplines and been coached in multiple disciplines, you learn that there's not a single message that reaches everyone. Just because you understand something in one way, doesn't mean that works for everyone. And given our recent results of doom and gloom not working electorally, if we want to win, we need to adjust our messaging to sell our party.

Sticking with what hasn't worked just because that message resonates with you, not actually a plan that seems likely to work consistently. When I get donation requests that yell about how we're doomed if I don't chip in 3 dollars, those get deleted immediately. When the Red Cross cries about urgent need for blood, there's only so many times I can donate, they need to find a better way to get more people to donate.

If the only way we can beat Trump with the "he's a horrible person" approach when there's Covid, that's not a winning strategy because we only get that every 100 years. We did the George W Bush is going to kill democracy in 2004, didn't win, we did Trump's supporters are deplorable and he's a threat to democracy in 2016, didn't win. We did Trump's a threat to democracy in 2024, didn't win. When you're saying something people lived through is the sky is falling, and the sky didn't fall as much as claimed, it becomes increasingly ineffective. Is Trump worse than last time? Absolutely. But when we relied on that and ignored that our policies under Biden weren't addressing people's concerns, just saying Trump bad, people bought into Trump wasn't that bad last time, it won't be that bad this time.

bigtree

(93,617 posts)
23. you misunderstand
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 03:20 PM
Yesterday

...if people want to know what I believe then they need to read what I express to them.

I read and fully understood what you've written.

I just don't think any of it means a thing if people aren't prepared to listen. Maybe they are now.

There's a man in the WH, with a majority party that's trying to either own or kill you. That's not something new that Democrats haven't been relating.

The people who voted for Trump said they cared more about their groceries than their liberty.

Like the people who looked at black youth being gunned down in the streets, or watched school massacre after school massacre, but still voted for the party that refused to lift a finger to act and blocked the party that did.

They needed to care enough to listen. I'm not the person that can be convinced the party didn't do or say something the right way, and has some control over whether people are choosing self interest over the state of the nation.

I can, however, envision they will more compelled to our party's messaging the more they feel their own interests and condition are threatened. But this isn't something I agree the party hasn't already done.

I think the issue of messaging has been pushed forward by so many interests (not you) which have never supported the party and doesn't care to even look sometimes before bashing our leaders for things they either haven't said, or have already repeatedly promoted for anyone bothering to look beyond the teevee news.

I just don't buy it. No one is making a monosyllable appeal to voters just centered on Trump. No one is doing that.

But we are undeniably the anti-Trump party, and that should be enough - and if it isn't, why the fuck not?

Why are these people we're supposed to be appealing to putting all of our lives at risk, and why the hell should I need to mollycoddle them into understanding the danger?

That's been my experience, for anyone new to appealing to Americans for their very lives.

EdmondDantes_

(1,462 posts)
40. I'm going to ask how I misunderstood this
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 05:17 PM
Yesterday

"They didn't listen when we warned them every way possible, and I'm not one to argue this crap to that we didn't say something or the other to make it clear enough for anyone to understand. "

You already made up your mind that we told them everything they needed to hear and you aren't going to listen to any argument that we could have made it more clear. Sorry but that's what you're clearly expressing, and not all of us believe that's the case.

bigtree

(93,617 posts)
41. I'm not a Democratic spokesman
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 06:02 PM
Yesterday

...I'm who I described to you.

I can accept that you have an opinion on this. I read it.

But I don't have a complaint with the party messaging at all.

That's someone elses concern, not mine.

And I'll say again, since you got my attention. I have actual experience in making political appeals to both parties to heed LIFE AND DEATH ISSUES, and some people associating themselves with the party counseled me and others that talking about that was a diversion from whatever they wanted to express.

It's a wonder anyone can listen to me relate that and not just take heed of my experience, but here we are.



Rendville

(172 posts)
3. Which National Leaders Flew Into MN To Participate In The Protest?
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:03 PM
Yesterday

IYO. In your opinion we certainly have a lot of work ahead of us.
Which of these camera-hungry national Leaders flew into frigid MSP to participate in the protests?
Mayor Frey was out there. Governor Tim Walz visited Renee Good’s Memorial Murder Site.
Local Community Leaders were out there bundled up marching, singing, praying & being assaulted.
But where were the National politicians who now will be asking for our vote?
Kamala Harris? Chuck Schumer? Hakeem? AOC? Ken Martin?

SocialDemocrat61

(7,115 posts)
7. Kamala Harris is a private citizen
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:14 PM
Yesterday

And under no obligation to do anything. She warned everyone and they still refused to vote for her.

TheFarseer

(9,759 posts)
4. Pro workers
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:03 PM
Yesterday

Anti billionaires and their job stealing robots. This should be a really easy message.

Keepthesoulalive

(2,164 posts)
32. They didn't care
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:59 PM
Yesterday

They said DT reflected their values. You can’t fight crazy or brainwashing.

Jilly_in_VA

(13,945 posts)
12. We are, or should be
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:27 PM
Yesterday

THE ANTI-FASCISM PARTY. Because Shady McMaybelline and all the rest of them are still FASCISTS!

mcar

(45,767 posts)
15. Democrats ARE more than an anti-Trump party
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 01:54 PM
Yesterday

This is about the 6th iteration of this "message" from various and sundry "experts." It's a cheap hit on Democrats, IMO.

Remember how after the 2024 election, pundits declared that Harris lost because all she campaigned on was anti-Trump. BS then, BS now.

BTW, these were the same pundits who, on Election Day, declared that Harris had run a flawless campaign.

betsuni

(28,840 posts)
18. Message "anti-establishment" candidates use when running against Democrats.
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 02:33 PM
Yesterday

Same old lie for ten years. "Democrats can't just be the anti-Trump party" being used by one already, I just saw, who I guess is probably going to run or backing someone running because why else say things you know aren't true. Very very disappointing.

Melon

(1,139 posts)
19. Lower housing costs, lower cost of food,
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 02:39 PM
Yesterday

Address inflation, address the Government debt issue. Anti Trump is not a party platform.

betsuni

(28,840 posts)
25. Kamala Harris' top priorities: housing ($25,000 for first-time house buyers) food cost (ban on price gouging)
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:32 PM
Yesterday

fighting inflation (groceries, housing, prescription drugs) child tax credit cutting taxes for the middle class and raising taxes on the wealthy and corporations. She talked about economic issues all the time, "sandwich generation" Medicare help, growing the middle class, etc.

If anyone didn't know that, they never heard Harris speak. Biden talked about his accomplishments all the time, job creation, low unemployment, infrastructure, etc. Guess people never heard Biden either.

betsuni

(28,840 posts)
46. Clinton: Shrunk deficit. Gore: Social Security lock box, climate. Obama: ACA. Biden: He's FDR!
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 11:09 PM
23 hrs ago

Economics IS what Democrats are known for. Dem administrations, blue states -- economy is always better. No bubble economies when burst plunging the country into recession, horrible deficit spending, wars, tax cuts for wealthy and corporations. Everybody does know this and yet it's some sort of mass denial.

Projection.

maxrandb

(17,230 posts)
20. I don't know. Being the pro-Nazi, anti-Democracy, "Fuck your Feelings" party
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 02:55 PM
Yesterday

seems to have worked to achieve unchecked political power for the Retrumplicans. Hell, the fucking media describes it as "political genius"

Why are Democrats the ONLY fucking voters required to have morals, empathy and adhere to the norms of humanity?

BTW - while I was typing, I accidentally spelled media as "mefia". It autocorrected, but I am not sure.

"M-E-F-I-A" is close to MAFIA, and since the networks seem to be nothing but organized crime enterprises, Mefia might be an accurate spelling.

W_HAMILTON

(10,188 posts)
22. Here we go with this shit again.
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 03:18 PM
Yesterday

We can -- or at least should... -- unite and know who to """vote against."""

We can't all agree on what to """vote for.""" We are all for universal healthcare, student loan reform, higher taxes in the wealthy, etc. but there is no consensus on the many ways to get there. And that leads to disunity.

We've literally seen this borne out by recent electoral history. We can unite to vote Trump and his MAGA Republicans out of office, but we let them back in rather than vote to keep in office what had been the most progressive administration in our lives.

ColoringFool

(386 posts)
37. I Think It Is ESSENTIAL To Tell About The Opponent! After all,...
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 05:15 PM
Yesterday

Trump promised this and promised that, and if Democrats promised THE SAME THINGS---lower prices for eggs and gasoline; reduced inflation, e.g.---WHO WILL TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LIAR?

WHO WILL TELL THE FACTS ABOUT REPUBLICAN LARCENY, MURDERS, TREASON, ETC.?

returnee

(853 posts)
28. There are sooooo many ways....
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 04:46 PM
Yesterday

…to be anti-TSF that it would really cover all the bases. Not to mention he and hiso administration represent an existential threat.

Response to gulliver (Original post)

Keepthesoulalive

(2,164 posts)
34. Democrats put out their economic plan
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 05:05 PM
Yesterday

They fought to keep people’s healthcare affordable and the republican’s pushed through their bs make billionaires richer bill. Joe Biden had a jobs and infrastructure plan and he was pushing for more energy efficient jobs. Stop buying republican bull.

Response to Keepthesoulalive (Reply #34)

bigtree

(93,617 posts)
43. why should anyone parse their fear of this government
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 06:05 PM
Yesterday

...into something like concern for groceries.

'What about the groceries, then? I'm begging you,' isn't the appeal anyone should expect from our leaders representing people under actual armed siege by their government.

walkingman

(10,429 posts)
38. If we can't beat these sorry bastards it speaks more about the American electorate
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 05:15 PM
Yesterday

than Trump himself.

drray23

(8,624 posts)
44. Possibly but running as policy wonks
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 06:31 PM
Yesterday

Will make us lose again. The gop always manages to distill their messaging in simple to understand terms. Yes, its usually dumb slogans but it works.

Trump and his party have gone full fascist. Pretending otherwise and trying to bring the debate to "policy differences" and let's work together in a bipartisan way is a sure way to lose.

Our electorate is out for blood and want the country back. Proposing a milquetoast approach will lose us the momentum.

KS Toronado

(23,281 posts)
45. I'm getting sick & tired of this " long-shot of taking the Senate" bullshit
Tue Jan 27, 2026, 07:26 PM
Yesterday

Every elected R is a PEDOPHILE PROTECTOR, people don't like child molesters. We need to hit them hard
with the facts so all voters understand why they should vote for no Rs during the midterms. We should
also be lining up worthwhile candidates to run against them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats Have to Be More...