Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,898 posts)
Fri Dec 19, 2025, 07:43 PM Dec 19

Transcript of Andrew Weissmann excoriating Todd Blanche on the Epstein Document release

Andrew, we've been talking um
0:02
theoretically you've been reading. Uh
0:04
anything strike you in terms of what the
0:06
Department of Justice has made public?
0:10
Um I want to turn to something that you
0:12
said at the outset, which is that we're
0:14
going to look for what's in there, but
0:15
we're going to also look for what's not
0:17
in there. And I just want to talk for a
0:19
moment what Todd Blanch said today
0:22
because it is outrageous. It is to me
0:26
this is just a huge joke that is
0:28
basically treating the MAGA base as a
0:31
bunch of fools.
Um so Todd Blanch said
0:34
today that Donald Trump for years has
0:37
wanted to make all of this public. Well,
0:39
we know that's not true because if he
0:41
wanted to do it, he could have done it
0:42
on day one of his presidency and he
0:45
hasn't. two, he said, well, as you've
0:48
reported that he's going to have
0:51
produced hundreds of thousands about
0:54
three few hundred thousand uh documents
0:56
today and a few hundred,000 he expects
0:59
later. Well, the law as you've said
1:02
required it to be produced today. So, he
1:05
is saying right now is there in
1:07
violation of the law. That's point two.
1:09
And then I did a little math because in
1:11
September of this year, the Department
1:14
of Justice put out an official statement
1:16
that said there's nothing to see here.
1:18
And they've gone through the 300
1:22
um gigabytes of information. Well, um a
1:26
few hundred thousand and a few hundred
1:28
thousand does not equal 300 gigabytes.
1:32
Um that is just not possible. It's not
1:34
plausible. And so the question is where
1:37
are the what what is not being produced?
1:40
I mean to me this is just going to
1:43
scream cover up because you have them
1:46
not complying with the law lying in my
1:49
view to the American people about the
1:51
president's wishes and then the ultimate
1:53
doing the math doesn't equal the number.
1:56
I mean there's no way that you get to
1:58
300 gigabytes with a few hundred
2:01
thousand or a few hundred thousand no
2:02
matter how big those documents are.
To
2:04
me, that is a huge part of this story is
2:08
what is not being produced. And to the
2:11
congressman's point, a responsible DOJ
2:16
would actually have had a press
2:18
conference and they would have talked
2:20
through the measures they took. They
2:23
would say, "This is what we've done.
2:25
Here's the procedures. Here is what we
2:27
did." Instead, you know that there is a
2:30
problem with what they're doing when
2:32
they do this through a sort of short
2:34
form announcement on Fox News that
2:37
doesn't answer any of that. Um, to me,
2:39
that's the story right now.
2:41
Well, and on your your point about
2:42
volume, I mean, I think the person who
2:44
first started talking in press
2:46
interviews about 300 gigabytes of data
2:50
was Cash Patel on Joe Rogan's podcast.
2:53
And when Cash Patel um I think in his
2:56
own confirmation hearing said no, he
2:58
didn't traffic to anyone. No one else
3:00
was involved and there's nothing to see
3:02
here. Um I think it was Joe Dur Rogan
3:04
who said what do they think we're all
3:05
babies? I mean the the lies that have
3:08
been told about the volume and the
3:10
substance um will either be proven as
3:13
lies or the truth will come out today.
3:16
And it seems, Andrew, that what you're
3:18
seeing so far in terms of the lack of
3:21
volume that is being released is that
3:24
the cover up continues.
3:27
Yeah. I mean, look, there's only one
3:28
reason Todd Blanch went on TV now is
3:31
because somebody had to be the fall guy
3:33
um for like explaining why they're not
3:36
complying with the law and saying, you
3:38
know, this is what we're doing. But it
3:40
is it is just unbelievable but that
3:43
nobody at the Department of Justice felt
3:45
like a that they're public servants
3:48
working for us and thus owe us answers.
3:51
Um and two we're just going to be you
3:53
know give a sort of thorough recitation
3:56
what congressman said if there's delays
3:59
at least explaining that but saying what
4:02
exactly is being produced and what is
4:04
not being produced. One of the things
4:06
that I'm going to be looking for is I've
4:08
been very focused on the quality of the
4:10
investigation that was even done in this
4:13
case because Todd Blanch has said
4:15
another thing which is that the
4:17
documents that we have so far that came
4:19
from the estate are ones that the
4:22
Department of Justice did not have. Um
4:25
that that I mean Mayor McCord and I
4:27
talked about this because we're sort of
4:29
career D. That is investigation 101 that
4:33
you would have the documents from the
4:35
Epstein estate. I mean, it's just
4:37
unbelievable they didn't have them. And
4:39
so, you're going to be thinking, what
4:40
else did they not get? And who did they
4:42
not interview? For instance, is there an
4:45
interview report of Donald Trump? Um,
4:48
among many others, you not just him, but
4:52
why wouldn't you interview him? And so
4:55
that's one of the things that if it's
4:56
not in there, you're going to be asking
4:58
yourself either A, does it exist but not
5:00
been turned over? or B, if he wasn't
5:04
interviewed, why on God's green earth
5:07
wasn't he?

Video Here:

&t=93s
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Transcript of Andrew Weis...