Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,018 posts)
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 05:03 PM Dec 16

Judge's ruling could doom Trump's bid to prosecute Comey

The case against Comey is very weak and relies on some material illegally obtained from one of Comey's former lawyers. Without the materials illegally seized from one of Comey's lawyers, there is no case. This is in addition to the fact that the statute of limiations has run on any prosecution. The ruling delivered another setback to the Justice Department’s rapidly foundering effort to prosecute one of Trump’s chief foes.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/12/12/judge-evidence-justice-department-james-comey/

A federal judge ruled Friday that the Justice Department unlawfully accessed evidence central to its case against former FBI director James B. Comey, delivering what could be a death blow to President Donald Trump’s efforts to reindict one of his most prominent perceived rivals.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ordered the FBI to return emails and other electronic communications it seized from Comey confidant Daniel Richman roughly five years ago as part of a separate investigation that did not result in charges.

Those records had formed the backbone of the case the Justice Department filed against Comey in September, and without them prosecutors maintained they were “effectively enjoined … from investigating or prosecuting Comey.”

Kollar-Kotelly faulted authorities for failing to obtain new search warrants before using the old Richman material as part of the Comey investigation. She described that lapse as a fundamental violation of Richman’s rights.

When the Government violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures by sweeping up a broad swath of a person’s electronic files, retaining those files long after the relevant investigation has ended, and later sifting through those files without a warrant to obtain evidence against someone else, what remedy is available to the victim of the Government’s unlawful intrusion?” she wrote.

The lawyers handling this case are really bad
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge's ruling could doom...