General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSO. Wiles was interviewed by Vanity Fair. Spoke honestly, spilled secrets. Now, she's ****ing her pants and backpedaling
DAMAGE CONTROL
The White House chief of staff described the jaw-dropping Vanity Fair articles as disingenuous.
Farrah Tomazin Political Correspondent
Published Dec. 16 2025 10:24AM EST
https://www.thedailybeast.com/susie-wiles-fights-for-job-after-spilling-every-trump-secret/
GusBob
(8,134 posts)Imma guess 5 billion
RockCreek
(1,314 posts)every person mentioned in the article demanded in deposition.
That's how every law suit needs to be addressed now.
underpants
(194,960 posts)but I doubt Trump cuts her loose.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/16/us/politics/trump-susie-wiles.html
off-the-clock
(335 posts)Thanks I believe she was turned out and talked your way back in several times before... And it is to him a very welcome distraction from Epstein
RockCreek
(1,314 posts)She'll speak conspiracy language. When can the current admin resist that??
underpants
(194,960 posts)This term is MUCH better run (mean cruel yeah) than the chaotic first term. As the article states, Kelly saw his job as keeping the moronic impetuous childlike Trump in check but Wiles is more focused on letting him go but keeping the operation running more smoothly.
Hell cut Kash loose because, well look at him.
Hell keep Hegseth to the end if for no other reason than being antiestablishment.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,063 posts)tanyev
(48,672 posts)Wiles is probably the one keeping all the mundane but necessary stuff going while Miller and Vought are busy plotting new offensives. What happens if Susie gets the boot?

malaise
(292,884 posts)MAGAts do what theyre born to do - feed off decaying and dead things.
Eff all of you - ReTHUGs, MAGAts, Christian nationalists, women-hating racists and supporting hacks every which way😂😂😂
MarineCombatEngineer
(17,744 posts)she tries to deny she said what she said.
Susie, Susie, Susie, if you didn't mean what you said in the interview, then why say it knowing full well that it will be published?
Me thinks one doth protest too much.
leftstreet
(38,866 posts)I'd bet SHE called Vanity Fair and said "release it now!!"
MarineCombatEngineer
(17,744 posts)with validity behind it.
With this criminal cabal in the WH, anything is possible.
leftstreet
(38,866 posts)All within an hour or so, extolling the virtues of Susie Wiles
Vought
Leavitt
Bessent
Patel
Duffy
McMahon
...
Link to tweet
?s=20
MarineCombatEngineer
(17,744 posts)More distraction from the coming Epstein files release?
Fiendish Thingy
(22,063 posts)The bombshell quotes being highlighted by other outlets such as The Hill are largely taken out of context, and the interview, for the most part, portrays Wiles as a loyal and fawning Trump servant. (Not that that is a good thing, but it is probably closer to the truth than what is being highlighted)
The alcoholic personality quote is probably the trickiest one for her to finesse.
Ms. Toad
(38,308 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,256 posts)and responsible, given his family history and the example of his dear lost brother, that he chooses not to - you know, for US. Easy to spin out of. I can do it from here.
Fiendish Thingy
(22,063 posts)But it may be trickier to sell that spin to Trump.
sboatcar
(704 posts)And figured that since any other interview she's done has been with Trump friendly media she could speak her mind and they'd only publish the parts where she talks about how much of a genius and how well hung he is.