General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump is using his attack on Rob Reiner to distract people again from Epstein and his ACA debacle
. It's very frustrating how people keep falling for the old trick bag when it comes to Trump. It's very predictable whenever he has a failure or is involved in a scandal he will rachet up inflammatory attacks whether it's racism, sexism, xenophobia, or personal attacks like he did on Reiner to get people to stop talking about his screw ups and failures. It's very frustrating to see this play out every single damn time.
I'm not saying what he did to Reiner shouldn't be condemned but I'm saying people need to continue to attack him on his policy failures and Epstein and not ever take the foot off the gas when it comes to this. This is the only way to weaken him. When you respond to his inflammatory attacks he regains strength again.
RandySF
(80,702 posts)hlthe2b
(112,544 posts)that HE is likely guilty of far more in relation to Epstein and Epstein's crimes than has yet been confirmed. I actually think the former makes even that population "primed" to believe more than they would have before WHEN the facts come out.
karynnj
(60,742 posts)Rob Reiner spoke out on many evil things that Trump has done.
I think Trump's vile rant was because he was beginning to see the heart felt praise from not just from Democratic leaders, but from people in entertainment who knew him or just loved his work. I suspect that many were people who Trump wanted to like him, but they didn't.
I don't believe that Trump strategically puts out his hateful rants to distract from other things. His rants are frequent ... as are negative stories on him. Not to mention, even if people could deal with just one controversy at a time which I dispute, all that would do is create the chaos of never ending negatives.
I don't think people losing ACA subsidies or know people who are will suddenly forget that or forget it was done to give a permanent tax cut to billionaires. As to the Epstein stories, they will dribble out, but it was clear even from what was known in 2016 that Epstein might have been the closest thing to a friend Trump had.
D_Master81
(2,334 posts)I think this is just who he is not some kind of intricate plot to distract the public.
orangecrush
(28,005 posts)Kaleva
(40,112 posts)By many accounts, especially by people who have worked with him , Trump is pretty clueless and everything has to be about him. I havent seen any evidence that Trump is capable of strategic thinking.
Jspur
(783 posts)has always been his go to move when he's in trouble. That's the only move he has in his playbook but for some reason Liberals and Democrats fall for it every single time.
mwmisses4289
(3,029 posts)or the epstein files, or anything else. It might go to the back burner for a bit, but both epstein and the failing economy aren't going away.
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,021 posts)Facing criticism from the left, right and center, the president had a chance to make things better. He did not.
When Paul Pelosi was nearly murdered, and Trump responded with conspiracy theories and jokes, it reminded the world that Trump is a man devoid of grace and decency.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-12-15T17:14:09.993Z
Targeting Rob Reiner, he did it again, digging a hole in the bottom of the barrel and falling even further.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/on-the-reiners-death-trump-should-have-quit-while-he-was-behind
In a normal White House, a president would see the pushback from his own ostensible allies and realize hed made a mistake (although in a normal White House, the comment never would have happened in the first place). In this White House, Trump acted as if hed never heard the old expression about quitting while behind.
Q: A number of Republicans have denounced your statement on Rob Reiner. Do you stand by it?
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-12-15T20:48:56.863Z
TRUMP: Well, I wasn't a fan of his at all. He was a deranged person as far as Trump is concerned.
At an unrelated event in the Oval Office, a reporter reminded the president that a number of Republicans had denounced his statement related to Reiner and asked, Do you stand by that post?
The smart move would have been for Trump to dodge the question and change the subject. He did not, however, make the smart move.
I wasnt a fan of his at all. He was a deranged person as far as Trump is concerned, the president said, referring to himself in third person. He said he liked, he knew it was false in fact, its the exact opposite that I was a friend of Russia, controlled by Russia. You know, it was the Russia hoax, he was one of the people behind it.
For good measure, the Republican added, He became like a deranged person, Trump derangement syndrome. So I was not a fan of Rob Reiner at all in any way, shape or form. I thought he was very bad for our country......
Instead, lets focus on the fact that Trump welcomed an avalanche of criticism from the left, right and center by condemning a celebrated artist immediately after learning of his death and, given an opportunity to make things better, made a conscious decision to make things worse.
Trump is who he appears to be: a small and petty man, incapable of empathy or grace, obsessed with his grievances, unaware of what it means to be presidential and unable to control his worst instincts.
lame54
(39,131 posts)He's just a callous asshole