General Discussion

red dog 1

(32,265 posts) Sun Dec 7, 2025, 04:51 PM Sunday

Sen. Mark Kelly's Bluesky post from Friday

Americans are struggling to pay their bills and afford groceries, and we've got a President who is asleep at the wheel.
— Captain Mark Kelly (@captmarkkelly.bsky.social) 2025-12-06T03:12:46.986Z

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sen. Mark Kelly's Bluesky post from Friday (Original Post) red dog 1 Sunday OP

at the wheel, behind his desk, in meetings, in the golf cart, at the breakfast table...is there LoisB Sunday #1

Late at night when he's supposedly Cha Sunday #3

True. LoisB Sunday #6

Perfect. Traitor is Literally and Cha Sunday #2

"Sorry, but this is the wrong characterization. He's not asleep at the wheel. He's not just screwing up at his job. sop Sunday #4

he wears that jacket well NJCher Sunday #5

LoisB

(12,165 posts)

1. at the wheel, behind his desk, in meetings, in the golf cart, at the breakfast table...is there

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Sun Dec 7, 2025, 04:56 PM

Sunday

anywhere he is not asleep?

Cha

(316,196 posts)

3. Late at night when he's supposedly

Reply to LoisB (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 7, 2025, 04:58 PM

Sunday

posting Lies & garbage on his Gaslit social media.

LoisB

(12,165 posts)

6. True.

Reply to Cha (Reply #3)

Sun Dec 7, 2025, 09:37 PM

Sunday

Cha

(316,196 posts)

2. Perfect. Traitor is Literally and

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Sun Dec 7, 2025, 04:56 PM

Sunday

Figuratively Asleep at the Wheel.

sop

(17,150 posts)

4. "Sorry, but this is the wrong characterization. He's not asleep at the wheel. He's not just screwing up at his job.

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Sun Dec 7, 2025, 04:59 PM

Sunday

He’s grabbed the damn wheel, floored the gas pedal, and driven straight into the center divider in an effort to flip the car and kill us all." - Bluesky commentL

NJCher

(42,204 posts)

5. he wears that jacket well

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Sun Dec 7, 2025, 07:38 PM

Sunday

Looks very sharp.

Reply to this discussion