Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHegseth's expansive security requirements tax Army protective unit
The agency tasked with protecting Defense Department leaders is under significant strain, and the secretarys atypical needs are becoming untenable, officials say.Defense Secretary Pete Hegseths unusually large personal security requirements are straining the Army agency tasked with protecting him as it pulls agents from criminal investigations to safeguard family residences in Minnesota, Tennessee and D.C., according to numerous officials familiar with the operation.
The sprawling, multimillion-dollar initiative has forced the Armys Criminal Investigation Division, or CID, the agency that fields security for top Defense Department officials, to staff weeks-long assignments in each location and at times monitor residences belonging to the Hegseths former spouses, the officials said.
One CID official, who like some others spoke on the condition of anonymity citing a fear of reprisal, characterized Hegseths personal protective arrangement as unlike any other in the agencys recent history.
Ive never seen this many security teams for one guy, the official said. Nobody has.
https://wapo.st/3HGT9dB
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hegseth's expansive security requirements tax Army protective unit (Original Post)
Zorro
Aug 2025
OP
MaddowBlog-Pete Hegseth reportedly has an 'unusually large' security detail, generating pushback
LetMyPeopleVote
Aug 2025
#3
Turbineguy
(39,796 posts)1. It's a well-known terrorist tactic
run up the costs for your enemy.
JustAnotherGen
(37,476 posts)2. When it comes
It will come from within that security detail.
haele
(15,034 posts)5. Praetorian Guards, anyone?
Multiple security units? What a snowflake.
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,370 posts)3. MaddowBlog-Pete Hegseth reportedly has an 'unusually large' security detail, generating pushback
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseths security detail is reportedly so large that its straining the Army agency thats tasked with protecting him
He doesn't have real friends, but still wants a 'posse' to hang around with him... no matter what it costs us.
— Deeds Not Words (@nodderuf.bsky.social) 2025-08-20T18:41:14.321Z
Pete Hegseth reportedly has an âunusually largeâ security detail, generating pushback
flip.it/imu9ct
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/pete-hegseth-reportedly-unusually-large-security-detail-generating-pus-rcna226070
At the FBI, for example, the bureaus deputy director has traditionally maintained a relatively low public profile and has never needed a security team. NBC News reported in April, however, that former conservative media personality Dan Bongino has received 24-hour security from a sizable contingent of agents.......
Its against this backdrop that The Washington Post reported on the most egregious example to date.
The Posts report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that this multimillion-dollar initiative has forced the Armys Criminal Investigation Division to even monitor residences belonging to the Hegseths former spouses.
Naturally, this is applying new strains on the Army agency and its budget. The Post spoke to one insider who said, We have complete inability to achieve our most basic missions.
The secretary and the Pentagon declined to comment.
The reporting, if accurate, is itself striking, but I continue to believe theres a related story behind the story: On a very regular basis, Defense Department insiders have appeared quite eager to let the public know about Hegseth-related controversies, suggesting the former Fox News host still has more than his share of critics within the building.
Its against this backdrop that The Washington Post reported on the most egregious example to date.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseths unusually large personal security requirements are straining the Army agency tasked with protecting him as it pulls agents from criminal investigations to safeguard family residences in Minnesota, Tennessee and D.C., according to numerous officials familiar with the operation.
The Posts report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC or NBC News, added that this multimillion-dollar initiative has forced the Armys Criminal Investigation Division to even monitor residences belonging to the Hegseths former spouses.
Naturally, this is applying new strains on the Army agency and its budget. The Post spoke to one insider who said, We have complete inability to achieve our most basic missions.
The secretary and the Pentagon declined to comment.
The reporting, if accurate, is itself striking, but I continue to believe theres a related story behind the story: On a very regular basis, Defense Department insiders have appeared quite eager to let the public know about Hegseth-related controversies, suggesting the former Fox News host still has more than his share of critics within the building.
Retrograde
(11,371 posts)4. Why does he need a security team?
I thought he was a bigly strong, manly warfighter, or whatever - shouldn't he be able to drive away his foes with just a withering glare?
Demovictory9
(37,113 posts)6. All those baby mamas