CNN adds nothing to previously reached conclusions, yet claims to "shed fresh light on how the pursuit of aid turned chaotic and then dangerous"

And what do they "shed"? Unidentified eyewitnesses with no apparent basis to their claims. Israeli forces operating "in the area". No shit, it's a friggin war zone! How far from the shooting was that area? Crickets. Multiple geolocated videos identify the site of the gunfire, which was already identified previously, but no source of the gunfire. Witnesses seeing gunfire emanating from the tanks, but no signs of tanks in the area that CNN could find. Unidentified weapons experts, apparently not present at the scene, finding the sounds they hear and the bullets they see to be "consistent with" but not traced to, certain weapons.

And then, in contradiction to their sensationalized header, the punchline: "However, CNN’s review of audiovisual material sheds fresh light on how the pursuit of aid turned chaotic and then dangerous, on the actions of Israeli forces and the consequences of the new aid mechanism", after presenting an article's full of nothing but unsubstantiated speculations which shed no fresh light on anything, and not a single action of Israeli forces tied to the consequences of the new aid mechanism.

What a friggin incompetent and lazy excuse for investigative journalism!

And this garbage is being accepted by CNN editors for print. Disgraceful

Hamas is ridiculous. American mercenaries and the IDF were there, controlled by Israel. As if they'd allow Hamas to be around shooting at people, and it makes no sense they'd kill Palestinians.

Baiting starving people, then slaughtering them is heinous, and a war crime.

but some folks don’t want to hear it.

An odd concept.

To not have to face the truth. I did read recently that it was an attempt to hang on to their humanity by acknowledging these are horrific crimes that their side could not possibly commit. But how many times is that going to work for them? And the damage it causes by carrying Israel's lies costs more Palestinian lives. They should think about that.

The "stories" being told to alleviate the conscience and deny it was the IDF - are ridiculous.

There is other evidence nicely ignored too, like the fact many were shot precisely in the head and chest or suffered shrapnel wounds, per the Red Cross an the UK-based Aid for Palestine - people at the field hospitals where the victims were taken.

I would add that starving people for 3 months, baiting them with the food you've denied them, setting up death traps for them through negligence or worse and then killing the hungry and desperate is not just unmitigated cruelty but evidence that Israel's intent is to starve Palestinians out of Gaza and make conditions so unbearable they will have no choice but to leave.

The GHF scam originally allotted for only 60% of Palestinians to have food (guess the rest can starve/leave). But since its roll-out, it has managed to feed only 13% of Gaza's population, according to the Guardian (if that even). It also limits aid to food only - no water, medicine, fuel for cooking, or basic essentials for human dignity. So of course disease will spread. As the final kick in the teeth, the food is dry or dehydrated foods that require water and cooking.

The cruelty seems calculated.

The cruelty is calculated.