General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKate Shaw for the win!!!!
This very accomplished attorney and wife of Chris Hayes just answered a chronic maga question the WAY IT SHOULD BE ANSWERED.
HAWLEY: Let's see the Trump chart. You don't think it's a little bit anomalous that Trump has so many more nationwide injunctions against him?
KATE SHAW: A very plausible explanation you to have to consider is that he's engaged in much more lawless activity than other presidents
Slam dunk.
Blue Owl
(58,163 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(22,025 posts)Was she testifying before congress?
In It to Win It
(12,316 posts)HAWLEY: Let's see the Trump chart. You don't think it's a little bit anomalous that Trump has so many more nationwide injunctions against him?
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-06-03T20:27:00.456Z
KATE SHAW: A very plausible explanation you have to consider is that he's engaged in much more lawless activity than other presidents
brush
(61,033 posts)GiqueCee
(3,402 posts)... would be provide much needed clarity. The post raises more questions than it answers.
Cirsium
(3,361 posts)Skittles
(169,519 posts)he loses all credibility right there, regardless of his pimping for Trump
Cirsium
(3,361 posts)Did Hawley have any credibility to lose?