General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoly crap: AI video just took a startling leap in realism. Are we doomed?
MAY 29, 2025 12:58 PM
Last week, Google introduced Veo 3, its newest video generation model that can create 8-second clips with synchronized sound effects and audio dialoga first for the company's AI tools. The model, which generates videos at 720p resolution (based on text descriptions called "prompts" or still image inputs), represents what may be the most capable consumer video generator to date, bringing video synthesis close to a point where it is becoming very difficult to distinguish between "authentic" and AI-generated media.
Google also launched Flow, an online AI filmmaking tool that combines Veo 3 with the company's Imagen 4 image generator and Gemini language model, allowing creators to describe scenes in natural language and manage characters, locations, and visual styles in a web interface.
Both tools are now available to US subscribers of Google AI Ultra, a plan that costs $250 a month and comes with 12,500 credits. Veo 3 videos cost 150 credits per generation, allowing 83 videos on that plan before you run out. Extra credits are available for the price of 1 cent per credit in blocks of $25, $50, or $200. That comes out to about $1.50 per video generation. But is the price worth it? We ran some tests with various prompts to see what this technology is truly capable of.
How does Veo work?
Like other modern video generation models, Veo 3 is built on diffusion technologythe same approach that powers image generators like Stable Diffusion and Flux. The training process works by taking real videos and progressively adding noise to them until they become pure static, then teaching a neural network to reverse this process step by step. During generation, Veo 3 starts with random noise and a text prompt, then iteratively refines that noise into a coherent video that matches the description.
Snip
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/05/ai-video-just-took-a-startling-leap-in-realism-are-we-doomed/
Comment: I love tech, I have always loved tech since I was a toddler in the 1950's. But these videos just scared the crap out of me..
If there was ever a "Must see tv" moment, then the ones in this article are them.
marble falls
(71,087 posts)sinkingfeeling
(57,223 posts)Johnny2X2X
(23,685 posts)That's the only way to tell what is AI right now, AI still messes up fingers. Sometimes it's extra fingers, more often now it's just longer fingers, like a thumb that is longer than the rest of the fingers.
Once AI can do fingers correctly, there will be no way for me to tell anymore.
LiberalArkie
(19,314 posts)0rganism
(25,472 posts)AI image and video generators have largely resolved the issues with extra/missing/malformed fingers and teeth. They're getting better at rendering occlusal shadows and reflections too. If you see any images or videos with that kind of inconsistency in them now, it's mainly because the prompter didn't care about fooling people anyway.
We have a serious problem. It's here, now. So far there's not a plan to deal with it.
Midnight Writer
(25,145 posts)bigmonk
(109 posts)As a portrait painter, I say, "Jesus Fucking Christ!".
hunter
(40,368 posts)""Oh my lord, look at that Atari 800 you have behind you! I can't believe how nice it is!"
k_buddy762
(638 posts)and everything looks cinematic.
In year, yes, you will be unable to tell reality from fiction.
Buns_of_Fire
(19,007 posts)Hmmm... Roger Stone as Cthulhu... I see some possibilities there...
TheProle
(3,900 posts)and I bet there are a lot of film and commercial directors getting very nervous.
Abolishinist
(2,887 posts)I'm curious, would anyone happen to know the answer to the following. If one creates a video, such as the one I linked, are they able to replicate the person and have them appear in another video, or are they one-offs?
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/A_man_on_2025052615221.mp4?_=38
LiberalArkie
(19,314 posts)misanthrope
(9,380 posts)It would become very easy to frame someone for a crime, regardless of what they had actually done or not done.
Beringia
(5,343 posts)You can't fake things like models of cameras and ownership of the camera
Kid Berwyn
(22,958 posts)See. Theres the proof.