Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(21,798 posts)
Sun Jun 1, 2025, 05:23 PM Jun 2025

Skeevy little Trump ass-kissing maggot Moses Mikey Johnson: Medicaid recipients will "choose" if they lose coverage

Speaker Mike Johnson says some Medicaid recipients will 'choose' whether to lose health care under House spending bill

https://www.yahoo.com/news/speaker-mike-johnson-says-medicaid-145150330.html

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Sunday defended cuts to Medicaid in the budget bill House Republicans passed last month, saying that “4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so.”

Johnson told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” that the bill imposes “commonsense” work requirements for some Medicaid recipients and added that he’s “not buying” the argument that the work requirements, which would require able-bodied Medicaid recipients to work, participate in job training programs or volunteer for 80 hours a month, are too “cumbersome.”

“You’re telling me that you’re going to require the able-bodied, these young men, for example, OK, to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week. And that’s too cumbersome for them?” Johnson told “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker. “I’m not buying it. The American people are not buying it.”

The bill also adds new rules and paperwork requirements for those Medicaid recipients and increases eligibility checks and address verifications.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Skeevy little Trump ass-kissing maggot Moses Mikey Johnson: Medicaid recipients will "choose" if they lose coverage (Original Post) Miles Archer Jun 2025 OP
they freakin keep defending these cuts vapor2 Jun 2025 #1
Noem's "demand" should have been met with a swift, brutal, immediate "NO." Miles Archer Jun 2025 #3
Young men? BeerBarrelPolka Jun 2025 #2
We should hildegaard28 Jun 2025 #4

vapor2

(3,781 posts)
1. they freakin keep defending these cuts
Sun Jun 1, 2025, 05:47 PM
Jun 2025

while we pay for 47's $400 million jet plus Noem's jet plus the military parade. WTF ?

Miles Archer

(21,798 posts)
3. Noem's "demand" should have been met with a swift, brutal, immediate "NO."
Sun Jun 1, 2025, 05:53 PM
Jun 2025

And obviously, the same for Trump, but Noem just wants bling to go along with her costumes.

hildegaard28

(792 posts)
4. We should
Sun Jun 1, 2025, 09:38 PM
Jun 2025

Apply the similar measures to their beloved billionaire tax cuts. Make the billionaires volunteer in order to get them. Make them fill out an endless stream of paperwork. And, best of all, make them prove that they need more taxpayer money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Skeevy little Trump ass-k...