Commentaries like this post are very insightful, but ever since those big firms let themselves get extorted by doing pro bono work for Trump, there's been no sign of a strong institutional resistance - from state Bar Associations to the ABA, censure, disbarring, etc.. IANAL, but I haven't heard of any organized response yet.

I don't know how organized these firms are but I'm sure there is a lot of cross communications.

The Bar associations including the ABA are always very slow (cautious?) in their actions against their members.

Joyce Vance and others are supplying almost daily reports on groups that are standing up to the illegality of this regime's actions.

1-7.400 - Disclosure of Information
Concerning Ongoing Criminal, Civil, or Administrative Investigations
A. Any communication by DOJ personnel with a member of the media relating to a pending investigation or case must be approved in advance by the appropriate United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General, or their designee, except in emergency circumstances. For administrative investigations not overseen by a United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General, approval must be obtained from the Assistant Attorney General for Administration, or their designee. Where the investigation is being handled by the Office of the Inspector General, approval must come from the Inspector General, or their designee. Obtaining information from or related to the news media is covered by the Department's news media policy, 28 C.F.R. § 50.10.

B. DOJ generally will not confirm the existence of or otherwise comment about ongoing investigations.
Except as provided in subparagraph C of this section, DOJ personnel shall not respond to questions about the existence of an ongoing investigation or comment on its nature or progress before charges are publicly filed

C. When the community needs to be reassured that the appropriate law enforcement agency is investigating a matter, or where release of information is necessary to protect the public safety, comments about or confirmation of an ongoing investigation may be permissible, subject to the approval requirement in subparagraph A.

D. An investigating agency may not disclose to a member of the news media or general public its recommended charging decision in a criminal case without the approval of the appropriate United States Attorney or Assistant Attorney General overseeing the prosecution of the case, or their designee.
[updated February 2024]

https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-1-7000-media-relations

It’s up to the state or states they are licensed in, anyone really think there’s a snowball’s chance that Florida would discipline her? They can quote ABA rules all day but they have no authority regarding law licenses or state bar associations.