Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(132,806 posts)
Tue May 13, 2025, 01:45 PM May 2025

Rule of law is 'endangered,' chief justice says

Chief Justice John Roberts described the rule of law as “endangered” and warned against “trashing the justices,” but speaking in Washington Monday he didn’t point fingers directly at President Donald Trump or his allies for publicly excoriating judges who’ve ruled against aspects of Trump’s agenda.

“The notion that rule of law governs is the basic proposition,” Roberts said during an appearance at Georgetown Law. “Certainly as a matter of theory, but also as a matter of practice, we need to stop and reflect every now and then how rare that is, certainly rare throughout history, and rare in the world today.”

As many legal experts express grave concern about Trump’s attacks on law firms and with several federal judges advancing inquiries into whether the administration is refusing to comply with court orders, Roberts took a longer-term view Monday. He blamed schools for shortchanging civics education and leaving students with little understanding of the structure of U.S. government or the role of the courts.

“That’s really too bad,” the chief justice told graduating students at the law school. “We’re developing a situation where a whole group of young people is growing up having no real sense about how our system of justice works.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rule-law-endangered-chief-justice-233910370.html

Where were you on Presidential immunity?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ocelot II

(129,042 posts)
3. Shoulda anticipated the outcome the rest of us predicted
Tue May 13, 2025, 01:48 PM
May 2025

when you decided presidents are immune from prosecution for "official acts." While the monster is loose and destroying the village, Dr. Frankenstein sits and frets in his laboratory.

bucolic_frolic

(54,020 posts)
4. I take that as a double-shaded implication that voters made a bad choice.
Tue May 13, 2025, 01:51 PM
May 2025

Odd that Republican politicians share in none of the blame.

NNadir

(37,296 posts)
7. Well if he'd any repect for the Constitution, which he doesn't that wouldn't be...
Tue May 13, 2025, 01:54 PM
May 2025

...the case.

I have no patience with arsonists complaining about fires.

Irish_Dem

(79,762 posts)
10. Yes he thinks we believe all his absurd lies.
Tue May 13, 2025, 02:10 PM
May 2025

He could not care less about rule of law.

Starbeach

(291 posts)
12. Handle with Care, JR
Tue May 13, 2025, 02:30 PM
May 2025

Yes, JR, you really acted like you were trusted with the awesome responsibility of guarding the sacred judicial system when you rewarded an avowed con man with a free pass for life.

Did you take civics?

usonian

(23,521 posts)
15. You made your job obsolete by granting the little King infinite powers. Off to the Gallos you go.
Tue May 13, 2025, 03:27 PM
May 2025


MAYBE YOU CAN JUDGE WINE
YOU SUCK AT JUDGING THE CONSTITUTION

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rule of law is 'endangere...