Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,328 posts)
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 09:53 AM Feb 2

Why are we not putting holds on some of these atrocious nominations?

https://bsky.app/profile/kevinmkruse.bsky.social/post/3lh5qfq4uec2u

My mentions are filled with people insisting Senate Democrats are powerless.

They’re not. They can throw up roadblocks by denying unanimous consent, forcing quorum calls, using holds and filibusters, etc

It’s so easy to figure out even a dimwit like Tuberville managed to pull it off.

End snip

It only takes one Senator for a hold.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are we not putting holds on some of these atrocious nominations? (Original Post) deminks Feb 2 OP
Well, if we don't do something soon, there won't be anything left of the Democratic Party Walleye Feb 2 #1
...or of us. Nt spooky3 Feb 2 #3
Yes, and our beloved country Walleye Feb 2 #4
Or of our country! SheltieLover Feb 2 #11
Trump Nominations badgolfer Feb 2 #2
Yea, they always seemed to have a way to slow shit down. bluestarone Feb 2 #8
TSF will just do what he threatened: Adjourn the Congress and use recess appointments. sinkingfeeling Feb 2 #5
Because they're chicken shits? choie Feb 2 #6
I am not of the delusion genxlib Feb 2 #7
Yep TnDem Feb 2 #9
A great question that isn't asked enough. I think we all know the answer to that. Autumn Feb 2 #10
Is there a reason Musk didn't have to be confirmed? Lars39 Feb 2 #12
Only takes one senator for a hold. Igel Feb 2 #13
There are no filibusters LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2 #14

badgolfer

(268 posts)
2. Trump Nominations
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 09:57 AM
Feb 2

Democrats need to take lessons from Mitch McConnell as he sure knew how to slow down and defeat Obama and Biden's nominees.

sinkingfeeling

(53,942 posts)
5. TSF will just do what he threatened: Adjourn the Congress and use recess appointments.
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 10:01 AM
Feb 2
https://www.npr.org/2024/11/16/g-s1-34493/how-far-can-trump-go-to-get-his-nominees-confirmed

His pressure campaign is already underway, with Trump posting on social media ahead of the Senate Republican leader election earlier this week that a majority leader "must agree" to allow for recess appointments if his nominees otherwise stall out during the confirmation process.

genxlib

(5,784 posts)
7. I am not of the delusion
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 10:10 AM
Feb 2

That the replacements, interim or recess appointments will be any better. He will get minions and they will do what he wants.

In some ways, I feel like it is better to have the name recognition of the current clowns because they will be easier to hold up to scrutiny.

If RFK Jr gets shot down, we will end up with someone with lower profile but just as evil that will fly further under the radar screen.

I know it sounds weak but for me the best thing to do is express ourselves about the dangers and vote against them. Then every single one of those statements and votes is an opportunity to tear them down later when things inevitably go south.

TnDem

(645 posts)
9. Yep
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 10:16 AM
Feb 2

You get it 100%...Reality is always harder to swallow than emotional responses.

Trump is going to get his people in place one way or another, through strong-arming the Senate with primary threats, (which will become reality), recess appointments, or nominating even worse but more sedate nominees.

Autumn

(47,214 posts)
10. A great question that isn't asked enough. I think we all know the answer to that.
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 10:29 AM
Feb 2

Protecting an old archaic system is more important than protecting the people.

Igel

(36,538 posts)
13. Only takes one senator for a hold.
Sun Feb 2, 2025, 12:30 PM
Feb 2

But that just means they need to have a vote on cloture. It doesn't mean they can't have a vote, just that a senator has indicated a 'no' vote when a vote by unanimous consent is taken. One 'no' = measure fails. Hence the cloture vote.

Tuberville put a hold on something like 1200 nominations. Holding a cloture vote for all 1200 would take forever.

Putting a hold on one or two nominations just means the senator would delay things for a day or two, or maybe even just a few hours.

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12200

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are we not putting ho...