General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. House Republicans roll out bill to restrict birthright citizenship
WASHINGTON Falling in line with President Donald Trumps executive order to end birthright citizenship, House Republicans on Thursday unveiled legislation that would amend federal immigration law to narrow the scope of citizenship, although the right is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
Trumps Monday executive order has already faced staunch legal challenges from Democratic state attorneys general and the ACLU, with oral arguments on a multistate case starting Thursday in federal court in Washington state.
The sponsor of the House bill, H.R. 569, GOP Texas Rep. Brian Babin, said he welcomed the legal challenges to Trumps executive order and to his bill.
We appreciate and wanted the challenges to this, he said. So we can get it into the Supreme Court of the United States. This thing could take up to three years before it winds up on the high court and lets see how they (rule).
https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2025/01/24/dc/u-s-house-republicans-roll-out-bill-to-restrict-birthright-citizenship/
Unless it's a Constitutional Amendment they're just pissing into the wind.
Lovie777
(15,942 posts)instead of helping the American people and its land, they are set on destroying everything.
Frank D. Lincoln
(866 posts)Auggie
(32,002 posts)Setting up the mid-terms. Anything to make Democrats look bad.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)It's unconstitutional You can't override the constitution with a bill. This makes the Republicans look like seditious morons.
Auggie
(32,002 posts)that's the only takeaway that matters. They know it's unconstitutional. Democrats are being intentionally set-up. I believe this is the first of many such idiotic, unlawful bills designed specifically to pander to the cult, and in the process, make Democrats look bad.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)Mariana
(15,271 posts)Trump got a lot of votes by promising to put an end to it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)The Quinnipiac University poll is one of the first times voters have been asked directly about the potential change to a long-standing policy, which could affect children born to undocumented parents or those here on student or tourist visas.
Of 924 voters, 63 percent said birthright citizenship should remain in place, granting any child born in the U.S. the right to an American passport. Meanwhile, 29 percent felt the system should be changed so that those born to noncitizens are not automatically eligible.
https://www.newsweek.com/ending-birthright-citizenship-popularity-donald-trump-immigration-2003145
Unpopular policy
In the latest AP-NORC poll, a slim majority of respondents, 51%, said they strongly or somewhat oppose changing the Constitution so children born in the U.S. are not automatically granted citizenship if their parents are here illegally.
In contrast, 28% said they strongly or somewhat favor ending birthright citizenship, and 20% said they didnt lean one way or the other.
The issue of whether or not to end automatic citizenship for those born in the U.S. which Trump vowed to do during his first term divided respondents along partisan lines.
The majority of Republicans, 53%, said they favored ending the policy, while the vast majority of Democrats, 73%, opposed eliminating it.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/as-trump-tries-to-end-birthright-citizenship-what-do-americans-think-what-poll-found/ar-AA1xBG22?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)Even just barely 50% of Republicans support ending birthright citizenship. Don't listen to the MAGA propaganda. They like to pretend that all their policies are massively popular, when in fact, almost all of their policies are massively UNpopular. Poll after Poll shows Democratic/Liberal/Progressive policies are far more popular.
And no, Trump probably gained 0 votes by promising to end birthright citizenship. Everybody in favor of ending birthright citizenship would have voted for Trump anyway due to his promise of mass deportations.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)The assertion embodied in her statement is that everything TSF does is popular because he won. He won by a hair, but nonetheless. He won because there were enough people who thought he could make eggs cheaper to supplement the vote of right wing culture warriors. Another issue. Trans rights, there is nowhere near a majority of people who want to erase them and make their lives miserable.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)buy into the MAGA propaganda that pretends everything they favor is popular. It may seem like that to some people because MAGAs are extremely loud and vocal and get far more exposure than the opposition to spout their positions on mainstream media. But it's just propaganda. Most MAGA positions are not popular with the population in general.
And as I mentioned, the Birthright citizenship "promise" almost certainly gained 0 votes for Trump as anti immigrant voters were going to vote for Trump no matter what.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)However they are nowhere near a majority. TSF won because their votes were supplemented by those who thought eggs cost too much.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)cadoman
(1,047 posts)And they are gonna get a shock when a lot of Democrats end up supporting this interpretation.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship/
The EO doesn't end birthright citizenship in its entirety--rather it addresses cases which are being "exploited", if you will, by foreign nationals, and will easily find resonance with the public.
If you ask the public if they support birthplace citizenship in general they'll say Yes, but if you ask them if two wealthy Chinese nationals should be able to book a vacation to gift their newborn with American citizenship, and you'll start seeing a lot of No's appear.
Take TFG out of the equation and poll support for this:
"Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States: (1) when that persons mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said persons birth, or (2) when that persons mothers presence in the United States at the time of said persons birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said persons birth."
If we're gonna make absolute birthright citizenship part of the party plank, we need to be prepared to defend some highly exploitive behavior on the part of foreign nationals. I want no part of it and I think the party would be foolish to defend a policy that doesn't benefit American voters.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)The legality of birthright citizenship for those who you (quite frighteningly) object to, has already been decided at the Supreme Court multiple times.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)A recent poll found only 28% favored ending birthright citizenship. Even for Republicans, only 53% favored ending birthright citizenship. Republicans and Trump are on the wrong side of this issue. Most Americans favor the Democrats position, so there is no way forcing a vote on something like this would make Democrats look bad. It would make Republicans look like idiots to the majority of the population. Your premise is just wrong.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article298897150.html
Auggie
(32,002 posts)Laugh now, cry later.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)Democrats supporting a popular position will in no way have any negative consequences to them. Period.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)The polling indicates that super majorities support maintaining birth right citizenship. If everyone voted on just that issue which would never happen the Democrats would win.
Auggie
(32,002 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)Auggie
(32,002 posts)Biden's bipartisan supported immigration bill was torpedoed by ***** solely to make the president look bad.
Of course the birth citizenship issue is bullshit. That's not the point. They're pandering to the cult and creating mid-term ammunition to use against Dems -- and moderate rebukes -- for voting against it.
Done.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)The Cult won because it was supplemented by voters who thought stuff cost too much and the president could wave a magical wand and fix it. Inflation was the best thing to happen to TSF. It's heartbreaking when you think about it. Joe Biden could have been a classmate of Methusaleh and nobody would have given a ---- if we didn't have that round of inflation.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)that a lot of people viewed the influx of large numbers of immigrants in recent years as a problem. Even mass deportation for those who have not been convicted of a crime polls poorly. However, prioritizing border security polls much better as does limiting the number of immigrants allowed in . Those are the immigration issues that motivated people, NOT birthright citizenship.
https://apnews.com/article/immigration-poll-deportation-trump-border-security-40b2a28e34f8d0c76b4a6589f3db1ba3
Border security is popular but that may be the limit of US immigration consensus: AP-NORC poll
January 22, 2025
https://news.gallup.com/poll/647123/sharply-americans-curb-immigration.aspx
Sharply More Americans Want to Curb Immigration to U.S.
July 12, 2024
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)I suspect almost nobody does. I do have a problem deporting people who have roots in the community, regardless of their status.
Wiz Imp
(3,101 posts)Quiet Em
(1,464 posts)It's very unpopular.
Rhiagel
(1,755 posts)doc03
(37,255 posts)from Native Americans.
obamanut2012
(28,061 posts)doc03
(37,255 posts)beyond that? Today it is eliminating FEMA. What will he come up with tomorrow.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,496 posts)And U S law supersedes tribal law.
spanone
(137,935 posts)gab13by13
(26,000 posts)One place I get my news is from freespeechtv.org.
Magats may use the angle that the 14th Amendment was not voted on properly. This was done during reconstruction and there is a question about whether or not all of the southern states were counted to get the 3/4 vote to pass the 14th Amendment.
Were the southern states a part of the union when this Amendment passed?
I do not know if this has legs but you won't hear about it on cable news.