General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs tsf even *capable* of nominating serious, competent Cabinet appointees ? We'll never know, unless he tries. He won't.
So far, he's shown not the slightest intention of finding candidates who even pass for sane and normal. Quite the opposite.
tsf picks people not for incompetence, but for anti-competence. He wants people whose 'skill' (I use the term loosely) sets are ideal for ruining the agencies they intend to command. He hates these Depts., Offices, etc. -- anything that represents gov't that works. He regards them as the enemy, and in truth that's what they are, because they are devoted to the opposite of what tsf is devoted to -- a practical, functioning, and wherever possible, fair and equitable gov't. tsf HATES gov't in all forms, as most modern Uglilcans do, but most of all he hates subordinates who won't slavishly do his evil bidding as if he were a hypnotic Dr. Caligari. So he's nominating a wrecking crew, with any profound character flaw that would normally kill a nomination now considered a big plus in his eyes -- and the whole GOP is supinely going along with it, as if somehow they just can't find any reason to object to what he's doing.
What we desperately need -- and almost certainly won't get, at least not soon enough to forestall real damage -- is for some GOP Senators to realize that for a third of them, their six-year terms will outlast his in any case, so they can oppose his nominees, and even loudly object to his policies, with minimal risk. Similarly, another third are in the third year of their terms, and will be in office at least as long as he will. If they hold fairly safe districts, they have the opportunity -- and I would say, the obligation -- to counter tsf's monomaniacal efforts to destroy anything and everything he can't control absolutely. He does not hold absolute power, whatever he thinks. It is only the acquiescence of the Congress and the SCOTUS which helps him maintain that delusion. Those in the GOP who expect to hold office after the end of tsf's second term -- possibly even after midterms --need to be planning their options with grim practicality, knowing their Golden Calf is a lame duck, even before he takes office.
I would dearly love to see a GOP Senator change his party affiliation to Independent. I don't expect it to happen. But the fact that switching just one Senate seat would have such an impact only emphasizes how very, very thin tsf's grasp on power really is. He doesn't have a mandate, he only has an anti-democratic Electoral College, a few hundred thousand useful idiots, and a genuflecting Congress in his corner. Any of the three could change, and need to.
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,044 posts)Putin has the goods on all of them. They don't dare stand up to Trump.
Prime example is Lindsey Graham.
Ocelot II
(122,362 posts)He's looking only for loyalty, and a particular sort of loyalty that would require the appointee to gut or destroy their agency, or at least hamper its functions, if Trump doesn't like that agency's purpose. The IRS director should be sure the IRS doesn't audit wealthy people, for example. The EPA director mustn't interfere with polluting corporations that donate to the GOP. Maybe an agency head could be competent and serious in the sense of being able to carry out Trump's demands, but if they actually try to do their job and the job entails doing what the agency was intended to do, they'll be gone. Rex Tillerson, the first SoS, is an example. He wasn't a very good manager of the agency, but he seemed to be serious about trying to do it right, and started clashing with Trump on various issues, especially relating to Russia. He was sacked after about a year. Other Trump appointees suffered similar fates when they made the mistake of taking their jobs seriously. At this point he'll be careful to appoint people with minimal qualifications and a history of blind, fanatical loyalty to be sure none of them actually try to manage their agencies properly since they wouldn't know how anyway.
tanyev
(45,045 posts)A serious, competent person would never be able to convincingly commit to that.
morillon
(1,276 posts)If you're Trump, you don't need experts or competent people in those roles. You can do all the jobs better than anyone. You just need people who'll do what you tell them to do.
BlueTsunami2018
(4,135 posts)These people are loyalist figureheads and spokespeople and thats all. Their competence is irrelevant because theyre not actually going to be doing anything, just as Piss Wig isnt actually going to be doing anything.
Hes going to play golf, make deals for his personal gain and make outrageous statements on TV but hes not going to be making or advancing policy. He doesnt know a fucking thing about policy.
The Project 2025 people are the ones who are going to be doing the real work of dismantling government and installing authoritarian policies. Theyve had this whole thing planned out for years if not decades.
Its all a smokescreen.
The best we can hope for is that the House is in such disarray that they cant get anything passed besides tax cuts. That they will undoubtedly get done.