General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNEW: House Dems tell AG Garland to do whatever it takes to release Jack Smith's final report on Trump's classified docs
@kyledcheney.bsky.social
NEW: House Dems tell AG Garland to do whatever it takes to release Jack Smith’s final report on Trump’s classified docs case — even if it means dropping the charges against his codefendants.
w/ Hailey Fuchs
www.politico.com/live-updates...
https://bsky.app/profile/kyledcheney.bsky.social/post/3lfuei4uy222h
House Judiciary Committee Democrats are urging Attorney General Merrick Garland, in his final days in office, to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s alleged mishandling and concealment of classified documents — even if it means dropping criminal charges against his alleged accomplices.
“It is essential that the American people and Congress understand how Mr. Trump mishandled our nation’s most sensitive classified information, especially because he will be sworn in as Commander-in-Chief and take leadership of our national security apparatus in just five days,” the Committee Democrats, led by write ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), wrote in a letter obtained by POLITICO.
The Democrats’ call came just days after Garland signaled he intended to maintain the secrecy of Smith’s report on the President-elect’s classified documents case, in part to protect the integrity of the ongoing criminal case against Trump’s former co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos DeOliveira.
Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon tossed the case out in July, ruling that Smith was illegally appointed. The Justice Department was seeking to reinstate the charges when Donald Trump won the November election, forcing Smith to dismiss the case against Trump while he worked to reinstate the charges against Nauta and DeOliveira. Trump’s Justice Department is slated to inherit the case next week, and allies expect it to be quickly shelved.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/16/congress/garland-trump-jack-smith-report-00198586

mobeau69
(11,888 posts)Escurumbele
(3,754 posts)Anyone who thinks, or believes that Garland is going to risk being talked harshly by republicans is wrong, this guy is a republican and he seems to be very loyal to his party, on top of it he seems to be very afraid of republicans and trump, so he will not do anything, he has proven that he doesn't care about the rule of law, otherwise he would have done things differently when he was able to do so.
I don't expect him to do anything that can help the country minimize the chaos that is coming. He is a tool, he has done his work for republicans with honors, or whatever "honors" that means.
Clouds Passing
(4,239 posts)jrthin
(5,074 posts)Then he'll mumble some crap about transparency. Then he'll do nothing but create more space for tfg to escape all consequences.
Justice matters.
(8,228 posts)
See the damaging results. History (if there is still one in a decade) will not be kind...
C_U_L8R
(46,899 posts)Kid Berwyn
(19,730 posts)We the People run the show, er, I mean until Reichsmarshal Musk and Doktor Bezos say otherwise.
calimary
(85,680 posts)Unfortunately, begging doesn’t often help much, either.
And frankly, WHY THE FUCK should we have to beg to get this done, in the first place???
Scrivener7
(54,997 posts)ShazzieB
(20,042 posts)A lot of people here didn't think the January 6 report would be released. So unexpected things can happen sometimes.
berniesandersmittens
(12,091 posts)Irish_Dem
(67,214 posts)Comedy Gold
TurboDem
(312 posts)I heard there's some guy named trump that he's been thinking about looking into also.
Buns_of_Fire
(18,275 posts)Now, just a footnote in whatever history the maggots permit to be published.
MadameButterfly
(2,730 posts)It will contain things that even Republicans can't stomach.
it will show everyone what is at stake.
It might even prevent Trump from getting away with all-out collusion with Putin.
VBNMW
(67 posts)EOM
MadameButterfly
(2,730 posts)And what is hilarious?
calimary
(85,680 posts)dalton99a
(87,743 posts)Think. Again.
(22,330 posts)MadameButterfly
(2,730 posts)once Trump is in office.
Trump is going to derail the case &/or pardon them as soon as he’s in office so WTF! Release the report!
raging moderate
(4,563 posts)After all, they might have had good reason to fear disobeying Trump.
Callie1979
(641 posts)Escurumbele
(3,754 posts)in place which do not include the rule of law, or the reason he was made AG. Its treason all over.
VBNMW
(67 posts)Keep needing to be pointed out?
OneGrassRoot
(23,684 posts)is going on? Why weren't they screaming at the top of their lungs for months? Why have most Dems been relatively silent about fascism since the election? Why did President Biden do a meet-and-greet being all smiles with Trump and then last night issue the appropriate warning?
Do you think something happened between the election and this week that somehow spurred on more urgency by higher-level Dems? It's not like anyone wasn't aware the 20th is in mere days.
yellow dahlia
(2,111 posts)The protocol and decorum and "meet-n-greet" type stuff has been driving me bonkers.
Think. Again.
(22,330 posts)The Wizard
(13,111 posts)put country first?
Tetrachloride
(8,635 posts)voteragain
(50 posts)the man behind the curtain was known long ago and strongly worded letters full of words.
the curtain has been open for a long time...words are useless when action was needed.
Native
(6,999 posts)yellow dahlia
(2,111 posts)ooops!
Escape
(157 posts)Why doesn't somebody confront the wimpy sonofabitch, stick a microphone in his face and make him answer for his 4 years of cowardice?
We don’t have a free press, fourth estate in this country. Corporate media is partially why we’re here. Independent media gets knocked over the head and dragged off in cuffs and mocked even here.
Oliver Bolliver Butt
(114 posts)Magoo48
(6,141 posts)LSparkle
(11,993 posts)yellow dahlia
(2,111 posts)republianmushroom
(19,279 posts)but, this is Merrick the Meek, we speak of. so it is questionable that it will be done.
gab13by13
(27,397 posts)That would be partisan, Garland's own words.
no_hypocrisy
(50,949 posts)Bluetus
(866 posts)This clearly would be covered by the "official acts" definition of the SCOTUS' "Nixon Rule", to wit, if the President does it, then it is legal.
gab13by13
(27,397 posts)This Supreme Court would rule that if Biden released the report it would not be his official duty. The SC would rule that it is up to Garland, not Biden.
Bluetus
(866 posts)could have ordered Garland to end the Florida cases and release the report. Trump is going to end them anyway.
Sorry, I can't praise Biden for making a speech warning us about these people when he isn't willing to do even the very minimum things in his power to protect our democracy.
Meanwhile, the Postrmaster General that Biden would not replace (*) is planning to cancel the order for electric delivery trucks from Oshkosh and replace them with another 20-year batch of gas engine trucks.
* And spare me arguments about how Biden didn't have the power to can DeJoy. He did. He has already named a majority of the Postal Board, and left other positions vacant for over a year. Obviously he decided to select people who would suck up to DeJoy.
I know Trump is going to be misery for everyone, but let's get it over and move on to a generation of leaders who will actually fight for the things we need. When Democrats refuse to use the powers the voters give them, we cannot be surprised when the voters see no reason to come out for us.
EOM
Biden is still president. They already ruled presidents can’t commit crimes while carrying the title. No backsies.
yellow dahlia
(2,111 posts)They left the definition open to interpretation - their interpretations.
VBNMW
(67 posts)He abdicated those powers. The same powers he could’ve used to save the democracy he claimed was in imminent danger.
Drumpf will use those powers on day one.
Why?!?
Also, who do I vote for to keep republicans out of office? Drumpf gave us a Republican AG, Biden gave us a Republican AG, Kamala promised MORE fucking republicans, some here even suggesting birther and liar Liz Cheney as AG. Like WTF?!?
yellow dahlia
(2,111 posts)Emile
(33,758 posts)
thebigidea
(13,489 posts)Her total lack of experience and connections with DOJ sure made for compelling legal arguments over the last decade!
Emile
(33,758 posts)not to make excuses for Garland anymore.
Javaman
(63,492 posts)thebigidea
(13,489 posts)So he'd decline just based on the fact that only Dems want it released, surely?
ThoughtCriminal
(14,481 posts)So there really is no reason not to release them now.
Bottom line: the only reason that Garland doesn't release them is that he does not want us to see them.
Rebl2
(16,010 posts)listen. Doesn’t want to get on orange thing’s bad side.