Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

the_liberal_grandpa

(162 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:01 PM Jan 15

I am done donating to democrats

Regretfully I donated to both Ruben Gallego and John Fetterman to help them win their elections.

Now I learn that they both are sponsoring the repubs "Laken Riley Act" which, according to a NYTimes article by Michelle Goldberg will allow for the indefinite incarceration of anyone merely accused of being and immigrant and of committing a crime. This includes children. With no requirement for due process or proof of committing the crime itself.

If passed as written by the right-wing nut jobs in the house it will become a stain on Democracy and an even bigger stain on democrats who appear eager to vote for it.

Fetterman and Gallego appear to be the new Manchin and Sinema for the Dems. They think that an immigration bill written by repubs is good "common sense" idea and makes perfect sense to them as is without any amendments.

I fear these two will backstab liberals the people who elected them over and over in the coming years as Manchin and Sinema did.

My new policy going forward is that I will not dontate a single penny to any democrat who does not have a solid record of fighting for liberal causes and will not donate to any democrat running for election for the first time out of fear that they are repubs or moderates who are lying just to get elected but have no real intention of supporting liberal causes.

Nor will I dontate to any democrat who talks about "working across the isle", "doing the right thing" or compromising with this new regime that seems hell bent on destroying our country.

We need fighters not appeasers.

95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am done donating to democrats (Original Post) the_liberal_grandpa Jan 15 OP
With you on that. I won't support appeasement. Autumn Jan 15 #1
I also donated to Fetterman gab13by13 Jan 15 #2
I'm all for primary him. Butterflylady Jan 15 #6
I'd be interested to see polling from Democrats on the topic Renew Deal Jan 15 #3
In Pennsylvania and Arizona mountain grammy Jan 15 #39
Right wingers always want to put it in personal terms. We're not talking about whether we like people here illegally Walleye Jan 16 #77
Political training tells you to put it on personal terms Renew Deal Jan 16 #79
How does it go? large minds discuss ideas, small minds discuss people Walleye Jan 16 #80
For politics, it's about the personal appeal Renew Deal Jan 16 #81
Katie Hobbs is supporting the bill. So is Mark Kelly. LeftInTX Jan 16 #93
I feel as you do. Ithinkdems coddled manchin ans senima too much Trueblue1968 Jan 15 #4
But will you still vote for such Democrats? Kaleva Jan 15 #5
I'm seriously considering withholding all donations Raven123 Jan 15 #7
I hope you reconsider. That's like throwing the baby out with the bath water. PortTack Jan 15 #27
I believed that in the past. Now I am not so sure Raven123 Jan 15 #62
And Sherrod didn't survive. I don't think it was his ideology however. LeftInTX Jan 16 #92
Sherrod isn't just left leaning Raven123 Jan 17 #95
This might help you get more informed awesomerwb1 Jan 15 #44
Thanks. A depressing read, but I appreciate the links Raven123 Jan 15 #52
I'm done donating as well mr715 Jan 15 #8
I am with you, good sir! OldBaldy1701E Jan 15 #9
I canceled my monthly $5 to Kamala and started monthly $5 to Alexandria yesterday LuvLoogie Jan 15 #10
AOC? You are right she maybe one of the individuals we all need to support. usaf-vet Jan 15 #13
And Crockett. Think. Again. Jan 15 #45
Yes and yes!! usaf-vet Jan 15 #55
She's one of the only ones I'd be tempted to support at this point, but why bother when she gets bypassed lostnfound Jan 15 #66
We agree. The wife and I are revamping our political donations. We are sick of the system & will change it in our house. usaf-vet Jan 15 #11
Don't forget U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. Frank D. Lincoln Jan 15 #12
They are doing what they need to win JI7 Jan 15 #14
Or they are following 40 year-old conventional wisdom that didn't work 40 years ago, either. nt Gore1FL Jan 15 #15
That argument doesn't fly rpannier Jan 15 #20
Both Democratic Senators from Georgia don't cow to the right - but apparently they're doing it all wrong tenderfoot Jan 15 #36
Jon Osoff is supporting it LeftInTX Jan 15 #57
That's unfortunate tenderfoot Jan 15 #59
and 40 + Dems in the House MadameButterfly Jan 16 #67
Yes, it will be abused. That's the purpose of laws like this. wnylib Jan 16 #87
Yeah. Due process matters for all humans MadameButterfly Jan 16 #88
How dare they! BannonsLiver Jan 15 #23
Winning involves betraying those that actually VOTED for them? tenderfoot Jan 15 #29
The people that voted for them want this JI7 Jan 15 #32
Fetterman supporters want this? Then why are the so upset? tenderfoot Jan 15 #33
They aren't all upset. In fact most aren't upset. JI7 Jan 15 #35
based on what evidence tenderfoot Jan 15 #37
Based on everything I see JI7 Jan 15 #41
I don't see it like that. tenderfoot Jan 15 #43
I'm not sure of that, BUT... Think. Again. Jan 15 #46
Yep BannonsLiver Jan 15 #40
I continue to donate to AOC and Jasmine Crockett. PatrickforB Jan 15 #16
Yes, there a plenty of Dems deserving and in the face MadameButterfly Jan 16 #68
The new Guantanamo Nululu Jan 15 #17
So Elon can be incarcerated indefinitely? travelingthrulife Jan 15 #18
Oh no BigMin28 Jan 15 #51
Eight Democratic senators are supporting this bill. Additionally, AZ Gov Katie Hobbs is supporting it. LeftInTX Jan 15 #19
It's still a shitty bill that won't accomplish anything whether Hobbs supports it or not tenderfoot Jan 15 #38
Good area to split Democratic voters V850i Jan 15 #21
Yes, the Dems in office should know this... Think. Again. Jan 15 #47
HOWEVER.... come general election time all Democrats need our support. groundloop Jan 15 #22
Support Democrats. Period. Oopsie Daisy Jan 15 #24
I tend to agree BannonsLiver Jan 15 #34
This isn't the trump cult.... Think. Again. Jan 15 #48
Doesn't matter. As long as they caucus with the Democrats, that's the most important thing. Oopsie Daisy Jan 15 #54
I disagree... Think. Again. Jan 15 #56
It is indeed short-sighted to dismiss the significant advantage of having a majority in either house of Congress * Oopsie Daisy Jan 15 #61
We've been accepting "imperfect" Democrats for years. choie Jan 15 #64
And their "bipartisanship" never ever Bettie Jan 16 #69
That's not true. What's been happening is that short-sighted folks have been failing to support the BEST candidate * Oopsie Daisy Jan 16 #72
This purity garbage will kill us even further travelingthrulife Jan 16 #74
Nonsense, we need a strong Left party... Think. Again. Jan 16 #75
This is how Republicans won their majorities, KY_EnviroGuy Jan 15 #25
Except 90% of their Democratic constituents DON'T want that. Think. Again. Jan 15 #50
Thank you! A voice of reason. Oopsie Daisy Jan 15 #58
Still a fan of Gallego BannonsLiver Jan 15 #26
I have to be more selective on who I donate to. The Third Doctor Jan 15 #28
The rethuglicans didn't even think it could become law awesomerwb1 Jan 15 #30
I haven't donated since 2000 GoreWon2000 Jan 15 #31
I want my donations to Sinema and Fetterman back Ritabert Jan 15 #42
Cool. Oopsie Daisy Jan 15 #49
We quit buying grapes because one of them was sour taxi Jan 15 #53
I hear you. Joinfortmill Jan 15 #60
Justice Democrats, Our Revolution, DSA, and maybe others are possibly worthy of your money. ColinC Jan 15 #63
They don't attract donations because they are terrible organizations. tritsofme Jan 16 #86
With that logic, the NRA, GOP, Heritage Foundation and ALEC are all amazing organizations ColinC Jan 16 #90
Those are Republican organizations. tritsofme Jan 16 #91
Why is it, pray tell, I can -without looking it up, name a dozen right wing organziations with billions in funding ColinC Jan 17 #94
We ABSOLUTELY need fighters Dee0909 Jan 15 #65
'(D)emocrat' bigtree Jan 16 #70
I'm not happy with Gallego's vote but MadameButterfly Jan 16 #71
Likewise... berksdem Jan 16 #73
They are interested in saving their careers, not about the people who elected them. alarimer Jan 16 #76
I won't stop donating to Democrats but not to all and we should have a list of appeasement Dems whom we should boycott kansasobama Jan 16 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author stillcool Jan 16 #82
I am done as well. suegeo Jan 16 #83
Ruben Gallego is in a border state Polybius Jan 16 #84
I'll keep contributing where I can to flip red districts thebigidea Jan 16 #85
As long as we continue to Vote Blue No Matter Who. Kaleva Jan 16 #89

gab13by13

(27,397 posts)
2. I also donated to Fetterman
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:27 PM
Jan 15

He pulled a Lyndsey Graham, or fell asleep and the body snatchers got to him.

Renew Deal

(83,709 posts)
3. I'd be interested to see polling from Democrats on the topic
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:30 PM
Jan 15

Last edited Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:14 PM - Edit history (1)

it's not clear cut to me how Democratic voters feel on the topic. I've had conversations with Democrats that voted for Obama, Biden, Harris that say they have little sympathy for people here illegally. If that's the feeling of even a plurality of Democrats, then supporting this will not hurt Fetterman and Gallego.

mountain grammy

(27,639 posts)
39. In Pennsylvania and Arizona
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:12 PM
Jan 15

I don't think it will hurt them. They both had weak and unlikable opponents and Gallego got more votes than trump in AZ. It's disappointing because this is such a bad bill and I don't think it would hurt them to oppose it.

Walleye

(39,229 posts)
77. Right wingers always want to put it in personal terms. We're not talking about whether we like people here illegally
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 11:28 AM
Jan 16

We’re talking about upholding the US Constitution that they all take an oath to. The problem with the right wingers is they have small minds.

Renew Deal

(83,709 posts)
79. Political training tells you to put it on personal terms
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 11:46 AM
Jan 16

How it impacts you and the ones you care about.

Walleye

(39,229 posts)
80. How does it go? large minds discuss ideas, small minds discuss people
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 11:58 AM
Jan 16

And revenge and retribution is not an idea. I’m getting a little too fed up with all his hate and anger. I got to take a vacation somehow.

Renew Deal

(83,709 posts)
81. For politics, it's about the personal appeal
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 12:24 PM
Jan 16

That doesn't mean negative campaigning. It means that we should talk about health policy in terms of how it impacts your children. We talk about environmental policy in terms of the cost and disruption you will personally feel by not taking a certain action.

As for a vacation, that is a choice. It is good to choose to disconnect or be less involved at times. The politics will be there when you get back. "Caring" isn't a good reason to allow politics to impact your wellbeing.

Raven123

(6,515 posts)
7. I'm seriously considering withholding all donations
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:24 PM
Jan 15

I am not fully informed on this particular issue, but it is time for the Democratic leaders to get everyone on the same page. The divide and conquer strategy is working for the GOP.

Raven123

(6,515 posts)
62. I believed that in the past. Now I am not so sure
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:50 PM
Jan 15

I could tolerate Manchin over the years. I was surprised by the Sinema. I am outraged by Fetterman. His behavior makes no sense. I’m scratching my head about Gallego.

Reagan started a movement to destroy jobs in America. NAFTA was signed by Clinton (though if memory serves me, the process began before his presidency). Since then Dems often have appeared as GOP light. Wish they were all as vigorous as Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown on jobs. Sadly, an opening was exploited by Trump.

I fear Dems are making the same mistake on immigration. Can’t recapture the narrative with these tactics.

Now I wonder if the only way to convince them to unify is the return their contribution requests with a note explaining my frustration rather than a check.

LeftInTX

(32,761 posts)
92. And Sherrod didn't survive. I don't think it was his ideology however.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 11:10 PM
Jan 16

But just having left leaning Democrats doesn't mean we will win.

Raven123

(6,515 posts)
95. Sherrod isn't just left leaning
Fri Jan 17, 2025, 05:19 AM
Jan 17

He is what the MAGA world claims to be: the defender of jobs in America. He just doesn’t demonize others to do so.

Dems need a winning strategy. Money is necessary but not sufficient to win.

awesomerwb1

(4,713 posts)
44. This might help you get more informed
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:19 PM
Jan 15

"A Democrat in contact with the Hill said that Republicans who had been pushing the Laken Riley Act as a political messaging exercise did not anticipate that it would become law. 'Republicans were surprised by how many Democrats folded like cheap fucking suits.'"

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/the-fear-is-the-point


First the background. The Laken Riley Act is unprecedented in modern U.S. history. It requires the federal DHS bureaucracy to build billions of dollars in new infrastructure to cage any undocumented person *even accused* of petty theft, shoplifting, or several other property crimes.

https://bsky.app/profile/equalityalec.bsky.social/post/3lfpm5n6z4k2w

LuvLoogie

(7,935 posts)
10. I canceled my monthly $5 to Kamala and started monthly $5 to Alexandria yesterday
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:46 PM
Jan 15

She's just the best

lostnfound

(16,904 posts)
66. She's one of the only ones I'd be tempted to support at this point, but why bother when she gets bypassed
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:44 PM
Jan 15

and the old guard is sticking with other old guard, instead of showing faith and confidence in AOC’s future.

usaf-vet

(7,418 posts)
11. We agree. The wife and I are revamping our political donations. We are sick of the system & will change it in our house.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:49 PM
Jan 15

1. no more money to groups that aggregate donations. In particular, A_ _b_ _ _ !

We donated to our in-state candidates during the primaries, and before we knew it, we received anywhere from 10 to a high of 18 requests in the email daily.

We still get 3-4 looking out to the midterms.

Here is how we will donate in the future so we can support our candidates of choice.

1. we set up another checking account in our bank to use when we want to remain anonymous.
2. we will use checks with no personal info on them.
3. requests for money via email will be reported as spam and filtered out using a specific filter.
4. I won't waste my time trying to unsubscribe in the political realm it has become a joke.
5. Unwanted USPS mail will go directly from the mail slot to the shredder slot.

We need to get rid of CITIZEN UNITED; it has corrupted and continues to corrupt our political system.

Gore1FL

(22,357 posts)
15. Or they are following 40 year-old conventional wisdom that didn't work 40 years ago, either. nt
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:58 PM
Jan 15

rpannier

(24,682 posts)
20. That argument doesn't fly
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:28 PM
Jan 15

Gallego isn't up for re-election for 6 years and Fetterman is 4 years
Neither is running for anything
If they're entire voting pattern is going to be based on 4 and 6 years down the road, then they're unreliable and weak

 

tenderfoot

(8,982 posts)
36. Both Democratic Senators from Georgia don't cow to the right - but apparently they're doing it all wrong
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:06 PM
Jan 15

LeftInTX

(32,761 posts)
57. Jon Osoff is supporting it
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:38 PM
Jan 15
At least seven Senate Democrats have indicated they would vote for the bill in its current form: Sens. John Fetterman (Pa.), Ruben Gallego (Ariz.), Mark Kelly (Ariz.), Jon Ossoff (Ga.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jacky Rosen (Nev.) and Elissa Slotkin (Mich.).




https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5076638-senate-laken-riley-act/

Warnoff voted to end the filibuster on the bill.

Nine senators voted to continue the filibuster.

MadameButterfly

(2,730 posts)
67. and 40 + Dems in the House
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:04 AM
Jan 16

I don't know if they are feeling pressure politically or actually agree. This law will be abused.

MadameButterfly

(2,730 posts)
88. Yeah. Due process matters for all humans
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 04:23 PM
Jan 16

If they are guilty, deport. But a fair process needs to determine that.
And it will affect far more than illegals. Anyone who looks foreign...

 

tenderfoot

(8,982 posts)
29. Winning involves betraying those that actually VOTED for them?
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:58 PM
Jan 15

So run more liars that tell people what they want to hear?

Gotcha!

 

tenderfoot

(8,982 posts)
43. I don't see it like that.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:19 PM
Jan 15

Fetterman is a right wing Trojan Horse just like Kristen Sinema, Joe Manchin and host of others that make sure things stay suck.

Think. Again.

(22,330 posts)
46. I'm not sure of that, BUT...
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:25 PM
Jan 15

...even a suspicion of being a Manchin means we need someone who is much stronger Left.

BannonsLiver

(19,025 posts)
40. Yep
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:14 PM
Jan 15

DU is basically a silo. There have been times when the outrage du jour on the forum did not translate into much outrage in the real world. This is one of them.

PatrickforB

(15,195 posts)
16. I continue to donate to AOC and Jasmine Crockett.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:02 PM
Jan 15

The Dems have to stop playing whiffle ball and start playing hardball.

MadameButterfly

(2,730 posts)
68. Yes, there a plenty of Dems deserving and in the face
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:06 AM
Jan 16

of Dems voting for these kinds of laws, we need to support Progressing Dems

BigMin28

(1,643 posts)
51. Oh no
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:31 PM
Jan 15

Leon is the perfect shade of pastie white. More importantly, he has the green. His kind get to stay, have government contracts, and will be meddling in all manner of things. Much to all of our detriment. Tsf will let him do it.

 

tenderfoot

(8,982 posts)
38. It's still a shitty bill that won't accomplish anything whether Hobbs supports it or not
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:12 PM
Jan 15

eom

V850i

(97 posts)
21. Good area to split Democratic voters
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:38 PM
Jan 15

There will be many other bills that are kind of written to split the Democrats on things we are not monolithic about (which is almost nothing).

groundloop

(12,725 posts)
22. HOWEVER.... come general election time all Democrats need our support.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:39 PM
Jan 15

I'm not at all thrilled with Gallego and Fetterman either, and will likely support a primary challenger against them. BUT, when it comes to the general election they're way better than anyone the GQP will nominate. Even if they don't vote with Democrats all the time they're preferable to anyone voting against us all the time.

BannonsLiver

(19,025 posts)
34. I tend to agree
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:05 PM
Jan 15

I guess folks here must think we have 65 seats since they want to cancel 7-8 Dem senators. I don’t think the DU silo is going to like what comes down the pike when it comes to the 2028 nominee.

Oopsie Daisy

(5,566 posts)
54. Doesn't matter. As long as they caucus with the Democrats, that's the most important thing.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:36 PM
Jan 15

I'd give my left nipple to have a couple of more imperfect and conservative-leaning Democrats in the Senate. Manchin, for example... as much as he's loathed and despised here, I'd absolutely LOVE to have the WV seat filled by him. He's one more "warm body" that gets us closer to having a majority.

However, I acknowledge that for certain individuals with limited foresight, prioritizing perfection may overshadow the acceptance of political realities and strategic thinking.

Oopsie Daisy

(5,566 posts)
61. It is indeed short-sighted to dismiss the significant advantage of having a majority in either house of Congress *
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:44 PM
Jan 15

It is indeed short-sighted to dismiss the significant advantage of having a majority in either house of Congress, even with imperfect Democrats. This control extends to committees, appointments, and various crucial mechanisms. Any notion of relinquishing this advantage would be unwise. Perfection is unattainable, a fact well understood by those grounded in reality. Those who fail to grasp this concept risk naively surrendering power to the GOP in pursuit of idealized visions, driven by pride and unrealistic aspirations.

choie

(5,294 posts)
64. We've been accepting "imperfect" Democrats for years.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:41 PM
Jan 15

How has that worked out for us? Here we are, in the shit because they are so self serving and devoted to bipartisanship.

Bettie

(18,100 posts)
69. And their "bipartisanship" never ever
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:17 AM
Jan 16

goes toward Democratic priorities, it only seems to mean "doing what Republicans want".

And the other side? They don't do any bipartisanship.

Oopsie Daisy

(5,566 posts)
72. That's not true. What's been happening is that short-sighted folks have been failing to support the BEST candidate *
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:22 AM
Jan 16

* in contests between a Democrat and a Republican or in contests where the spoiler and 3rd party candidates have ZERO chance of winning. In national and statewide races, the contest is always a binary choice. Only one of two candidates will win: the Democrat or the Republican. All the others are spoilers.

When it comes right down to it, any vote (or non-vote) that does not benefit the Democratic candidate has the net effect of benefiting the GOP candidate.

Mature and realistic voters understand and accept the reality that no candidate is perfect. They also know and understand that only ONE of the candidates is BETTER than the other. And that ONE of the candidates has values that more closely align with their own. And that ONE of the candidates will help to move the political arc closer to the goals and aspirations we seek to achieve.

However, it's sad that we must deal with impatient and angry voters who think it's better to sit-out the election (in protest) or who vote for a Green candidate (in protest) and who do nothing to help ensure the victory of the BEST of the only two candidates who will win. We have a defacto two-party system. Spoiler candidates never win national elections.

In this instance, the definition of "accepting" needs to be refined and tweaked, or a different word needs to be used entirely. For the types of impatient, immature and unrealistic voters I described above (ie: the ones who do not support Democrats) they are only benefiting the GOP with their myopic strategies. They give the GOP more power to undo progress already made and to set up roadblocks for future progress.

And then, like clockwork, these non-voters and saboteurs "blame the Democrats" because the candidate wasn't perfect or wasn't "good enough" to "earn their vote" (but in all cases the Democrat was BETTER than the Republican.)

travelingthrulife

(1,948 posts)
74. This purity garbage will kill us even further
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:56 AM
Jan 16

Hysterical nonsense. Get to work supporting our one other party or you will be in this hell forever.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,680 posts)
25. This is how Republicans won their majorities,
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:52 PM
Jan 15

....that and thousands of deceptions and lies. And, once elected they are hard as hell to defeat because of their unity, relentless media presence and billionaire support.

What if Fetterman and/or Gallego told you that 90% of their Dem constituents want that bill passed?

In my 77 years, I've never seen a Dem candidate I agree with 100%, but I've also never seen a Rethug worthy of my vote. We must leave idealism as just parlor talk until the Rethugs have been uprooted, and I'll continue to support my Democratic candidates regardless of policy disagreements. Those issues must be settled during primaries.

JMHO.....

Oopsie Daisy

(5,566 posts)
58. Thank you! A voice of reason.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:39 PM
Jan 15

The philosophy of all or nothing, and NOT voting for the BEST candidate simply because they are not the PERFECT candidate is one that continues to baffle me.

BannonsLiver

(19,025 posts)
26. Still a fan of Gallego
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:53 PM
Jan 15

The fact that most here are up in arms tells me that politically this was probably the right call.

awesomerwb1

(4,713 posts)
30. The rethuglicans didn't even think it could become law
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:02 PM
Jan 15

"A Democrat who has been in constant contact with aides on the Hill said that Republicans who had been pushing the Laken Riley Act largely as a political messaging exercise did not anticipate that it would become law. “Republicans were surprised by how many Democrats folded like cheap fucking suits,” the Democrat added."

As someone on another thread put it: "Democrats are voting like Republicans to the surprise of Republicans".

It's a disgrace.

GoreWon2000

(1,358 posts)
31. I haven't donated since 2000
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:02 PM
Jan 15

The Congressional dems rolled over playing dead and let W steal the 2000 election.

taxi

(2,118 posts)
53. We quit buying grapes because one of them was sour
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:34 PM
Jan 15

I guess no one told the grocer though because they are still selling them
What to do?

ColinC

(11,098 posts)
63. Justice Democrats, Our Revolution, DSA, and maybe others are possibly worthy of your money.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:29 PM
Jan 15

The amount of money non-corporate, non-rightwing orgs get is laughably miniscule. Justice Dems have contributions in the millions. The others have contributions in the...hundreds (of dollars). Major right wing groups get 10s if not hundreds of millions in donations on a regular basis.

tritsofme

(19,036 posts)
86. They don't attract donations because they are terrible organizations.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:10 PM
Jan 16

Democrats shouldn’t waste a single penny on them.

ColinC

(11,098 posts)
90. With that logic, the NRA, GOP, Heritage Foundation and ALEC are all amazing organizations
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 09:20 PM
Jan 16

Sorry but corporate friendly does not equal "good"

tritsofme

(19,036 posts)
91. Those are Republican organizations.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 09:59 PM
Jan 16

It is interesting to note that the organizations you listed in your first post are often just as strong opponents of the Democratic Party than the ones in your second list, not to mention just as disingenuous.

It’s good to hear that Democratic donors haven’t thrown their money away to those terrible organizations, that’s great news.

ColinC

(11,098 posts)
94. Why is it, pray tell, I can -without looking it up, name a dozen right wing organziations with billions in funding
Fri Jan 17, 2025, 12:41 AM
Jan 17

But with the exception of the Harris campaign, can't really do that for Democrats?

It has absolutely nothing to do with being good or bad. It has to do with who they are helping and who happens to be funding them (rich people and corporations in the case of right wing groups).

There is no equivalent left wing or Democratic org that has consistently equivalent funding. Partially because of false and misleading propaganda slandering any organization that threatens to make a dent in rivaling right wing orgs in fundraising.

If we want change, we need diverse and organic grassroots left wing orgs to take on the behemoths of unlimited right wing superpacs and corporations.

Dee0909

(16 posts)
65. We ABSOLUTELY need fighters
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:28 PM
Jan 15

I agree we absolutely need the democrats to fight. This rolling over and trying to get along is bull. Republicans never try to get along with us. I don't understand what's wrong with Democrats. It's very disappointing and upsetting what this party has turned into.

MadameButterfly

(2,730 posts)
71. I'm not happy with Gallego's vote but
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:19 AM
Jan 16

we are lucky to have 2 senators from Arizona which was so recently Red. Kelly is supporting it too.
I strongly disagree with his vote but I prefer them to the alternative. We can't expect them to vote like they are from Massachussetts.

We put up with Manchin because we wouldn't have gotten a Dem from WVa. He gave us the majority and voted for our judges. Everyone new waht they were getting, though he lied and snookered Dems on the infrastructure bill.
Synema lied about her positions to her electorate and there's no excuse for her turn around. Kind of like the legislator in NC that switch parties and gave Republicans there a supermajoritiy. People like that should be permanently driven out of politics.

Fetterman? I don't know what is up with him. Whether he falls into Synema territory for me is still to be determined. I guess PA is officially purple now, but I expect he'll be primaried. i was really enthusiastic about him. So disappointed.

berksdem

(804 posts)
73. Likewise...
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 10:55 AM
Jan 16

I am done donating as well. I worked hard for Fetterman - I will work twice as hard to vote him out.

alarimer

(17,071 posts)
76. They are interested in saving their careers, not about the people who elected them.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 11:20 AM
Jan 16

Gallego, especially, should be ashamed. Anyone with brown skin will be targeted, and it won't matter if they are citizens or legal residents or not. They will be assumed to be illegal.

No donations from me.

kansasobama

(1,717 posts)
78. I won't stop donating to Democrats but not to all and we should have a list of appeasement Dems whom we should boycott
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 11:31 AM
Jan 16

Dems should have a list of appeasement Dems whom we should not support because our nation and democracy is more important than a few Democrats. Granted, boycott all the Republicans in the House and Senate unless they oppose the dictator felon.

Fetterman should be boycotted at this rate. He is really showing the middle finger to us. Remember how he was expecting everyone, even from outside Pennsylvania, to support him. I did too. What a fool! Now, he says he cares about Pennsylvanians who voted for Trump, Trump is not a fascist, and so on. If he thinks he is being clever, he has a thing or two coming. Come re-election, MAGAs will again go for a MAGA. He will beg Dems for funds. MAGAs are not donating or supporting him.

I was very good during this election cycle to not support or donate for Gallego. I have seen enough signs to predict Gallego will give us heartaches. He will try to appease Arizona MAGAS. Do not forget. Gallego did a very good job to not bring his popularity to help Biden or Harris.

Response to the_liberal_grandpa (Original post)

suegeo

(2,980 posts)
83. I am done as well.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 12:43 PM
Jan 16

Last edited Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:37 PM - Edit history (1)

Roll over and play dead when a known Russian asset, a known liar, a known cheat + vote suppressing GOPers.

I still can't believe the puppet won in a free and fair fashion. And that nobody is pushing back on this fascist bullshit.

Facebook + Cambridge Analytical. Now, no fact checking, no DEI. Masculine energy.

That rightwing nut bar Musk took over Twitter and allowed rightwing extremist propaganda.

The extremist republicans run (un)Truth Social.

Billionaire at Wa Post.
Same with LA paper.

What's being done to spread truth to counter all the lies? I fear the answer is "nothing."

ON EDIT: MERRY FITZMAS!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am done donating to dem...