Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cyrano

(15,388 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 02:59 PM Jan 15

Rachel Maddow announces an all out counter attack

The core of the Republican Party, and their "Dear Leader," have been openly at war with our Constitution, our freedoms and our way of life for the past 10 years. And our Democratic leadership, as usual, has tried to "reach across the aisle" and make nice. They are trying to "make nice" with people who don't really give a damn about American citizens, their well being, or whether they live or die.

On Monday night, Rachel announced that, starting next Monday, when the felon is inaugurated, she will go back to her five day a week schedule. And she will stick to that schedule for the first hundred days of his (mis)administration.

To me, this is the first and biggest counterattack on those who want to rule us permanently. Given the research, attention to detail, and all out effort that goes into getting Rachel on the air every night, this is an effort that could literally kill her. But she's doing what none of our Democratic leadership is doing. She's announced that the depravity and outright brutal fascism that Trump is going to try to solidify in the beginning of his term, will not go unopposed. She will be on the air every night of the week, calling him out, highlighting his "craziness" of the day, and trying to make people aware of the pure evil that has descended upon us.

Where the hell is the rest of the Democratic "leadership?" Where is the effort of Dem billionaires to try to build a propaganda machine to counter that of the Republicans? Will the "rich and famous" get out there at every opportunity and denounce those who are trying to enslave us all? Rachel has publicly said: "I'm all in on this war, and here's what I'm going to do." Where the hell is everyone else?

If we survive the coming onslaught, (and if Mother Nature allows us to survive climate change), I believe that future historians will place Rachel alongside those greats who came forward, took a stand, and made a difference when our democracy and our freedoms were in peril.

124 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow announces an all out counter attack (Original Post) Cyrano Jan 15 OP
The launching of The Contrarian by prominent journalists is also a big deal. milestogo Jan 15 #1
Agreed. I subscribed yesterday. Oh, and The Guardian. Polly Hennessey Jan 15 #38
I want EVERYBODY writing/submitting pieces for them.. Volaris Jan 15 #81
Yes, all of us, especially the grassroots. Magoo48 Jan 16 #112
Where are they? Lunabell Jan 15 #2
Here's one... Think. Again. Jan 15 #40
She's one of the few. And I absolutely adore her!! Lunabell Jan 15 #44
I agree, hopefully the Dem Party will become more welcoming... Think. Again. Jan 15 #46
Cuban, Soros, and Buffet could do amazing things BonnieJW Jan 15 #48
Ask Fetterman where they are. Capitulating. Klarkashton Jan 15 #3
And Dick Durbin choie Jan 15 #37
How old Rebl2 Jan 15 #41
Crockett & AOC are reps, but I get what you mean. choie Jan 15 #42
I was just Rebl2 Jan 15 #45
Gotcha! choie Jan 15 #56
max frost (one of the best decisions florida ever made!) orleans Jan 15 #88
Lazy institutionalists - a perfect description for so many of our dems. -nt CrispyQ Jan 15 #60
Durbin is one of those "old guys" who needs to be replaced. Intractable Jan 15 #67
Sheldon Whitehouse, IMHO. yellow dahlia Jan 15 #69
I think Sheldon Whitehouse should have been allowed to take over as Chair yellow dahlia Jan 15 #68
Some of us want to know why 12/12/2000 & George W Bush weren't blaring wake up calls. CrispyQ Jan 15 #4
Because The Dunning Kruger Syndrome is nothing new. OldBaldy1701E Jan 15 #15
2000 taught me why George Washington hated political parties GoreWon2000 Jan 15 #50
I blame the supreme Court k55f5r Jan 16 #91
I agree about the Rehnquist 5 GoreWon2000 Jan 16 #119
We need an opposition leader LuvJoesPartner Jan 15 #5
Yes. But he/she/they need a megaphone Cyrano Jan 15 #9
We can make it broader. SleeplessinSoCal Jan 15 #16
EXACTLY! WE have to be the mega-giant social media. No billionaire is riding in on a white horse to save us. We save us. Attilatheblond Jan 15 #26
Yes. I am looking for the same thing. yellow dahlia Jan 15 #72
If there are people on the left who will speak wnylib Jan 16 #97
Yes!!!! nt returnee Jan 15 #13
Hear hear! yellow dahlia Jan 15 #71
No. We Need Progressives At The Grassroots Level Who Won't Just Hide On Liberal Forums TomCADem Jan 15 #83
Go get him Rachel !!!!! Take Rumpy and the GOPigs down !!!!! Trueblue1968 Jan 15 #6
The correct question is not JustAnotherGen Jan 15 #7
Where are they indeed? Evolve Dammit Jan 15 #14
Dems keep bringing slingshots to the fight GoreWon2000 Jan 15 #49
Truth yellow dahlia Jan 15 #73
That'll teach 'em BannonsLiver Jan 15 #8
Do you need a "sarcasm" thingy? Cyrano Jan 15 #10
She's collecting a big fat paycheck to do it too. BannonsLiver Jan 15 #35
Yes, The media has no impact. Just ask fox. Think. Again. Jan 15 #39
Yeah Rachel's audience is a good deal smaller than Fox's audience BannonsLiver Jan 15 #43
But it could be bigger BonnieJW Jan 15 #51
Sure, if you think cable TV is going to reverse a decade long trend of declining viewership. BannonsLiver Jan 15 #52
Probably 99 percent of people don't know who that is. erodriguez Jan 16 #95
Perhaps MSNBC wants to get more than one day a week for the $25 million dollars they are paying her every year MichMan Jan 15 #61
Dems julmur Jan 15 #12
You can't be civil with the uncivil. Lunabell Jan 15 #22
so who do you admire on the stillcool Jan 15 #78
What are you even talking about? Lunabell Jan 15 #84
yeah...same here stillcool Jan 16 #106
I think it is pretty self explanatory. Lunabell Jan 16 #117
oh well...goody for you! stillcool Jan 16 #121
This. Lunabell Jan 17 #123
We the people and Al Gore were abandoned in 2000 GoreWon2000 Jan 15 #47
But only for the "First Hundred Days". calimary Jan 25 #124
The Lone Rachel marti Jan 15 #11
Team billionaire is for team billionaire Blue Full Moon Jan 15 #17
"It's a big club, and you ain't in it!"-George Carlin nt Shipwack Jan 15 #23
Five keys of Counter-propaganda: FACET Bernardo de La Paz Jan 15 #18
In communities all around this country there are Neighborhood Internet groups. vanlassie Jan 15 #31
You got it. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 15 #33
Right On Baron2024 Jan 15 #58
Thanks. Yes to the two ideas in your post Bernardo de La Paz Jan 15 #70
That Is All Good Baron2024 Jan 15 #74
Kick. How do I bookmark this? summer_in_TX Jan 16 #98
Congressional Rep George Whitesides SleeplessinSoCal Jan 15 #19
That Is Some Cool Stuff Baron2024 Jan 15 #59
Thanks. Not sure where to put it. SleeplessinSoCal Jan 15 #62
He had to fight like hell. SleeplessinSoCal Jan 15 #64
Thanks For The Info Baron2024 Jan 15 #65
Loved her since she was a guest on 'Countdown' Denvermosaic Jan 15 #20
And half of the voters in the country won't see it and wouldn't give a shit if they did. ECL213 Jan 15 #21
Whether that's true or not, having her voice matters. summer_in_TX Jan 16 #96
Don't get me wrong... ECL213 Jan 16 #113
You do have a point. summer_in_TX Jan 17 #122
MSNBC Ups Rachel Maddow to Five Nights, Sends Alex Wagner Into Field for Trump's First 100 Days LetMyPeopleVote Jan 15 #24
So Wagner will be doing the Trump Diner circuit? Blaukraut Jan 15 #32
Ms Wagner's reports from the field during election season tishaLA Jan 15 #87
Which amounts to zero erodriguez Jan 16 #94
Three cheers for Rachel. The woman's a national treasure. Ditto to MSNBC for supporting her. Hekate Jan 15 #25
Rachel can't do it alone Wicked Blue Jan 15 #27
I see this comment a lot, what I is it that we are pushing back, and pushing back hard! PortTack Jan 15 #34
"The Jewish guy from FL?" n/t Lulu KC Jan 16 #103
Moskowitz...if you've seen him in hearings you know what I'm talking about PortTack Jan 16 #108
Yup n/t Lulu KC Jan 16 #114
Your description of "Jewish guy from Florida" is offensive DeeDeeNY Jan 16 #104
There was no offense intended. It's no different than saying the atheist from somewhere. PortTack Jan 16 #110
Since Jews have historically been stereotyped by appearance, unlike atheists, it's different. Lulu KC Jan 16 #115
Get up, stand up. Stand up for your rights... BoRaGard Jan 15 #28
Let me guess...watch this space? Prairie Gates Jan 15 #29
I get the "100 days" piece of it, but why stop then? GoodRaisin Jan 15 #30
I think that will become more and more obvious as this plays out... yellow dahlia Jan 15 #75
Stick a fork in it, MSNBC is done. (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus Jan 15 #36
I don't think so. yellow dahlia Jan 15 #76
Good for Rachel! It's going to take all of us though. MiKenMi33 Jan 15 #53
I think Nicolle Wallace and Chris Hayes will also yellow dahlia Jan 15 #79
Yes and hopefully their ratings will go up. MiKenMi33 Jan 15 #82
MSNBC on the sale block EarthAbides Jan 15 #54
Happy to rally around Rachel. Other Dems in leadership positions?? Not many speaking out. Just an observation. Evolve Dammit Jan 15 #55
I Strongly Agree With The OP Baron2024 Jan 15 #57
Ditto yellow dahlia Jan 15 #80
If Rachel Maddow is out biggest counterattack HereForTheParty Jan 15 #63
I agree with you. I believe Rachel is standing up and providing some of the leadership we need. yellow dahlia Jan 15 #66
Check out Indivisible if you are looking for something to do. THey have a weekly to do list that is spot on. Amaryllis Jan 16 #118
Thanks yellow dahlia Jan 16 #120
Kick dalton99a Jan 15 #77
Steyer and Schultz BlueKentuckyGirl Jan 15 #85
The old guard needs to step aside and let the new generation take the fight to the fascists Mysterian Jan 15 #86
We are in bdamomma Jan 15 #89
It's just a TV show. hunter Jan 16 #90
Presidents Biden, Obama, Clinton and Secretary Clinton, will you lead the way? usonian Jan 16 #92
Biggest counter attack? erodriguez Jan 16 #93
Just the first 100 days is an all out counter attack? It's getting the viewers back in line flvegan Jan 16 #99
At her height, just a tiny percentage of adults watched her show Kaleva Jan 16 #100
MSNBC is desperate for their lost viewers. So Morning Joe kisses Trump's ass in the AM and ZonkerHarris Jan 16 #101
Fair comment. OnDoutside Jan 16 #102
I'm sure she's already on Trump's "Enemies List" Cyrano Jan 16 #105
I had no idea Maddow was at risk of dying for working a standard week thebigidea Jan 16 #107
In her own words, she said that Cyrano Jan 16 #111
If Rachel would call for a march on Washington. Prairie_Seagull Jan 16 #109
Democracy is in peril WokeAintWhatIAm Jan 16 #116

Volaris

(10,800 posts)
81. I want EVERYBODY writing/submitting pieces for them..
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:59 PM
Jan 15

Keith
Bulwark, LP,
Tre and his boys over at Wellread/Skews
John Stewart
The girls and boys at Daily Beans
I don't care of it comes from the streamers over at Twitch or Camsoda mad at pornhub bans.

This is going to take EVERYONE, and if AOC needs to do a weekly game stream/politics/interview from her Congressional Office, I don't give a damn.

This resistance is going to take ALL OF US.

 

Lunabell

(7,309 posts)
44. She's one of the few. And I absolutely adore her!!
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:27 PM
Jan 15

These young people aren't taking any more shit from these deplorable, racist, homophobic, misogynist etc... hypocrites. I am thankful for her courage. Thank you to ALL who speak truth to power instead of brokering despicable deals with the ceos, shareholders and other horrible human beings who will steal, cheat, threaten, kill their fellow humans for money and power.

There's no "compromise" or bipartisanship or on human decency. There's only one way and that is to fight the oligarchs, the tech bro billionaires who are destroying our world. And all the other idiots who fall for the lies and hate for their golden/orange calf messiah.

Think. Again.

(22,330 posts)
46. I agree, hopefully the Dem Party will become more welcoming...
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:33 PM
Jan 15

....to strong, young, progressive liberals.

choie

(5,294 posts)
37. And Dick Durbin
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:13 PM
Jan 15

who couldn't seem to get the where with all to hit Bondi with a follow up question to her claim of voting irregularities in the 2020 election. Like "Give me some examples". Crickets. We need fighters not lazy institutionalists.

Rebl2

(16,009 posts)
41. How old
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:21 PM
Jan 15

is he? I am telling you now I am in my late 60’s and we need more young people in congress, like yesterday! I really like the two senators from Georgia, Ms. Crockett, Ocasio Cortez, for example.

choie

(5,294 posts)
42. Crockett & AOC are reps, but I get what you mean.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:23 PM
Jan 15

However, it's not necessarily age. It's temperament.

Rebl2

(16,009 posts)
45. I was just
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:27 PM
Jan 15

thinking of younger people in the senate and house. I know Crockett and Ocasio-Cortez are in the house.

orleans

(35,838 posts)
88. max frost (one of the best decisions florida ever made!)
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 10:36 PM
Jan 15

i think he is wonderful!

"Maxwell Frost is the youngest member of the 118th Congress at age 27. He succeeded one-term representative Madison Cawthorn, who was the youngest person elected to the U.S. Congress since Jed Johnson Jr. in 1964, the second-youngest congressman in United States history.
-from wiki

he was elected in 2022 when he was 25! and began serving in jan. 2023; first member of gen. Z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell_Frost

Intractable

(958 posts)
67. Durbin is one of those "old guys" who needs to be replaced.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:24 PM
Jan 15

I caught part of Blumenthal's time with Bondi. He was also unimpressive, to say the least.

yellow dahlia

(2,110 posts)
68. I think Sheldon Whitehouse should have been allowed to take over as Chair
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:26 PM
Jan 15

of the Judiciary Committee.

CrispyQ

(39,367 posts)
4. Some of us want to know why 12/12/2000 & George W Bush weren't blaring wake up calls.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:31 PM
Jan 15
“If this were a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier... as long as I'm the dictator. Hehehe.”
― George W. Bush


Here's a DU discussion about a blogpost titled, "It's Time for a Democratic Barry Goldwater." For me the guy's POV really resonates.

OldBaldy1701E

(7,545 posts)
15. Because The Dunning Kruger Syndrome is nothing new.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:20 PM
Jan 15

They just came up with a neat way to describe the effect.

If the species is not fighting for survival, it gets fat and dumb. This is historical as well as physiological. We were just off of Clinton, when things were looking like they just might improve instead of decline. So, like the roaring 20's, we let the whole thing collapse because we were not paying attention. Historically, we do it all the time.

Even the most obvious signs can be smoothed over with a good propaganda machine

GoreWon2000

(1,358 posts)
50. 2000 taught me why George Washington hated political parties
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:55 PM
Jan 15

Dems were looking out for their own future possible elections and threw Al Gore and we the people under the bus in 2000. It's a tough thing to say but this is one of those times when the truth is really ugly.

k55f5r

(470 posts)
91. I blame the supreme Court
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:29 AM
Jan 16

Sandra Day O'Connor in particular. They should never put their nose into that business. That was a power grab.
It seems pretty obvious that, the Republicans have been fighting Roosevelt's New deal since its inception, and from Reagan on. They really upped the pressure.
Rtump is evil incarnate, but he could do nothing without the party behind him. From kidnapping and disappearing the children of. "Illegal aliens. ", to the theft of The treasure of the American people, there's nothing that those people reject.

GoreWon2000

(1,358 posts)
119. I agree about the Rehnquist 5
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 06:20 PM
Jan 16

however, the dem party leadership had some options but instead of fighting back and defending democracy, they threw Al Gore and we the people under the bus and hid in their cushy, ivory Washington towers instead while American democracy was being killed in broad daylight by the Bush brothers right under their noses. This is a tough thing to say but it's the ugly truth.

LuvJoesPartner

(100 posts)
5. We need an opposition leader
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:31 PM
Jan 15

One person or a team of people who will get in front of the media every time that the incoming administration lies to the public and counter with facts.

Cyrano

(15,388 posts)
9. Yes. But he/she/they need a megaphone
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:49 PM
Jan 15

Rachel is on MSNBC which doesn't have a broad enough audience to make a large difference.

What's needed, in addition to an opposition leader, is a mainstream media outlet such as NBC, ABC, CBS, The New York Times, or The Washington Post, to oppose Trumpism on a daily basis. Unfortunately, their owners have already shown us who they are.

Perhaps some online mega-giant social media app, that doesn't currently exist, will turn out to be the Calvary that comes to the rescue in the final scene of the movie.

Attilatheblond

(5,562 posts)
26. EXACTLY! WE have to be the mega-giant social media. No billionaire is riding in on a white horse to save us. We save us.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:38 PM
Jan 15

wnylib

(25,211 posts)
97. If there are people on the left who will speak
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:02 AM
Jan 16

bluntly, in ways that outrage the MAGAs, then MSM will pick it up and report it.

Speak the truth in ways that agitate people.

TomCADem

(17,802 posts)
83. No. We Need Progressives At The Grassroots Level Who Won't Just Hide On Liberal Forums
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 09:35 PM
Jan 15

This is why we lose. We keep on waiting for someone to carry our water for us. We think that all we need to do is vote every four years, post on a progressive forum a couple of times preaching to the choir, then change will happen. We both blame the media, but hope the media will save us.

On the other hand, MAGA don't return the courtesy of hiding out in their echo chambers, but the man kiosks and show up a local government meetings and kiosks to complain about voting, DEI, and immigrants.

Watch a meeting of any county or city board meeting, and you will likely have a few MAGA speakers who make it a point to blame crime or the cost of public services on immigrants. In contrast, you rarely see any progressives showing a similar amount of effort.

JustAnotherGen

(34,629 posts)
7. The correct question is not
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:38 PM
Jan 15
Where the hell is the rest of the Democratic "leadership?"

It's - Where are the Democratic Elected officials?

Ms. Maddow is a journalist.

Our Senators and Reps need to show a spine, call.people out on lies for telling lies, tell the media that Magat lies and so do they etc etc.

One journalist does not an Opposition Party make.

BannonsLiver

(19,024 posts)
8. That'll teach 'em
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:40 PM
Jan 15

You wanna F around with our Constitution, then stand back and brace yourselves because Rachel Maddow is going 5 nights a week!

Cyrano

(15,388 posts)
10. Do you need a "sarcasm" thingy?
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 03:55 PM
Jan 15

At least she's out there in the middle of the battle field. She's showing the way. And given the tactics and threats of the opposition, it takes a lot of guts for her to put a target on her back for every crazy in the wingnut party.

BannonsLiver

(19,024 posts)
43. Yeah Rachel's audience is a good deal smaller than Fox's audience
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:24 PM
Jan 15

But that doesn’t count for shit, either. Fox News is a relic. It keeps the olds informed and in line but precisely zero of the young bro culture, the people that helped Trump win in November, watch that shit at all. I imagine by the next cycle Fox and CNN will have even smaller audiences, which is part of a broader downward trend with cable as a whole.

But hey if this was 1996 that would have been a good point!

BonnieJW

(2,838 posts)
51. But it could be bigger
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:55 PM
Jan 15

Remember Keith Olbermann had a huge audience because he said exactly what he thought about the outrageous. People tuned in and they listened. I listen to his podcasts and he still has the fire 🔥

BannonsLiver

(19,024 posts)
52. Sure, if you think cable TV is going to reverse a decade long trend of declining viewership.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:57 PM
Jan 15

MichMan

(14,685 posts)
61. Perhaps MSNBC wants to get more than one day a week for the $25 million dollars they are paying her every year
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:43 PM
Jan 15

julmur

(196 posts)
12. Dems
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:10 PM
Jan 15

I’ve been stating this for years, where is our leadership???
We need loud aggressive voices to call this bull shite out!!
Seems since most are weathly and will not suffer the consequences of any economic or policy decisions made by the incoming fascist regime, our current “leaders” have all but abandoned us

 

Lunabell

(7,309 posts)
22. You can't be civil with the uncivil.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:22 PM
Jan 15

You gotta be cut throat and our current leadership is stuck on bipartisanship. I'm sorry, but that bipartisanship has sailed!!

stillcool

(33,484 posts)
78. so who do you admire on the
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:51 PM
Jan 15

other side of the aisle for their cut-throat actions? Is that like what Matt Gaetz would say? or Lindsay Graham? I would imagine that if something say Jamie Raskin said was repeated ad nauseum in the right-wing echo chamber, that might be okay with you? I don't understand how people seem to believe the two parties are on equal footing. Have the same resources, the same power behind them. Does that ever enter into the equation?

stillcool

(33,484 posts)
106. yeah...same here
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 12:44 PM
Jan 16

I was trying to figure out what your idea of Democratic leadership would look like, and how that would affect the way government works. I guess it is a bit difficult to understand.


You can't be civil with the uncivil.
Reply to julmur (Reply #12)
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:22 PM
You gotta be cut throat and our current leadership is stuck on bipartisanship. I'm sorry, but that bipartisanship has sailed!!

calimary

(85,674 posts)
124. But only for the "First Hundred Days".
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 01:44 PM
Jan 25

We need leadership that doesn’t give itself a deadline and then bail.

Bernardo de La Paz

(53,870 posts)
18. Five keys of Counter-propaganda: FACET
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:38 PM
Jan 15

FACET

* Fast (quick response),
* Accurate (true, unassailable),
* Clear (instantly digested),
* Everywhere (abundant, plentiful),
* Targeted (at audience of original propaganda)

or equivalently

* Fast (quick response),
* Aimed (at audience of original propaganda),
* Clear (instantly digested),
* Everywhere (abundant, plentiful),
* True (unassailable)

vanlassie

(5,925 posts)
31. In communities all around this country there are Neighborhood Internet groups.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:49 PM
Jan 15

I’m only familiar with mine- here in red California- but the constant misinformation is pitiful. I think it is a place to monitor and fight with facts. I do this without engaging in arguments. Everybody could do this sort of action.

 

Baron2024

(1,492 posts)
58. Right On
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:14 PM
Jan 15

Did you invent FACET or is it from another source? Good stuff. I wholly agree that we need strong and effective counter propaganda. We also need an alliance of Blue State Governors to coordinate and ally with each other, almost acting as an alternative government to the incoming Trump Regime.

Bernardo de La Paz

(53,870 posts)
70. Thanks. Yes to the two ideas in your post
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:29 PM
Jan 15

As to sourcing: I got four items from reading Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterpropaganda#Elements_of_counterpropaganda

I a few days ago realized that in the 21st century, we need do add Everywhere or Abundant: lots and lots of it to counter the lots and lots of propaganda being pushed by bots and maga (I repeat myself ).

Then I came up with the FACET acronym yesterday as a way to remember the items.

summer_in_TX

(3,519 posts)
98. Kick. How do I bookmark this?
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:05 AM
Jan 16

I tried and failed. The options button wasn't responsive.

Bernardo, this strikes me as both important and actionable, but it will take organization and sharing information to be as effective as possible.

Let me know if and as such organizing happens.

In the meantime, I've saved this in my personal files.

SleeplessinSoCal

(10,007 posts)
19. Congressional Rep George Whitesides
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 04:42 PM
Jan 15
https://news.yahoo.com/news/trial-fire-rep-george-whitesides-140000363.html

He has made megafires his calling. And with NASA experience and a seat in Congress, he can help redirect the ship of state to a safer future - for everyone!

"To be perfectly frank, a big part of why I ran was around the issue of wildfires. I started this organization called Megafire Action, and I've been involved in a space-based nonprofit project that's actually going to launch a first satellite soon that would detect the perimeters of fires, which is super important, because for one evening, we didn't have good perimeters. On the first big night, we didn't have good perimeters because we couldn't fly the planes.

Part of why I ran was because of this risk, which I viewed as existential to the folks in our district. And it just so happens that the thing that I was most terrified of has just hit other parts of LA County. But that risk still exists for our community, and it exists all over the West. So we need to have a national conversation about how we're going to address these kinds of huge climate risks that we see coming down the road....."

More at link.
 

Baron2024

(1,492 posts)
59. That Is Some Cool Stuff
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:18 PM
Jan 15

I had not heard of Whitesides. I am going to look up Megafire Action. We need more high tech methods for fighting these fires, such as the satellites that Whitesides mentions. Thanks for putting this information up. This maybe should be the OP for its own thread. Important stuff.

SleeplessinSoCal

(10,007 posts)
62. Thanks. Not sure where to put it.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:47 PM
Jan 15

DU has yet to establish a climate change forum. I guess it would go in Environment and Energy. But it's crazy that we don't have a dedicated forum for CC.

SleeplessinSoCal

(10,007 posts)
64. He had to fight like hell.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:55 PM
Jan 15

Had a big target on him. Lots of misinformation. Highly educated. He's my new hero. Such a relief that he took out Mike Garcia (R).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_T._Whitesides

summer_in_TX

(3,519 posts)
96. Whether that's true or not, having her voice matters.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:00 AM
Jan 16

She will build up and strengthen her audience who will be able to be more articulate themselves and share important information with their circles of influence.

That's true of everyone who stands up and speaks out. Or takes other action to help. Everyone in whatever role fits their own talents, personal characteristics, and experience matter.

Maybe we can help get the word out about the most important things she or others we find particularly valuable say, taking it beyond our echo chamber and out into conversations with friends and family.

ECL213

(342 posts)
113. Don't get me wrong...
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 02:18 PM
Jan 16

I love her. She's a fantastic educator, and I wish more people listened to her, but she's been doing her thing for years and the only ones who are listening are the people in our "echo chamber". My point is we can take what she teaches us "beyond our echo chamber" all we want, but half of the voters in this country still won't care, and we don't seem to be winning over enough recruits to make a difference.

In case you couldn't tell, I'm a "glass half empty" kind of guy. Tis my curse.

summer_in_TX

(3,519 posts)
122. You do have a point.
Fri Jan 17, 2025, 12:29 AM
Jan 17

We will be in a whole new situation in the days and weeks ahead.

I suspect we need to tune in to those specializing in effective framing more than anyone else, then repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat. In casual conversations, our spokespeople need to work it into every interview, in print, song, signs, art.

I'm trying to gather and compile advice from people like George Lakoff, Antonia Scatton, Gil Duran and others on not just what we need to be communicating but how. Dems too often take the bait, and respond to Republican framing.

We have lots of communicators, including Rachel, who are not disciplined with framing. Smart, talented, but not knowledgeable about its importance. We need to learn it and use it, every level of the party, including ordinary supporters. The more we hear the same solid message, the more we can use it too.

LetMyPeopleVote

(160,865 posts)
24. MSNBC Ups Rachel Maddow to Five Nights, Sends Alex Wagner Into Field for Trump's First 100 Days
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:32 PM
Jan 15

I am glad that Rachel is coming back five nights a week for the first 100 days of TFG (aka the Felony Guy) term



Breaking: Rachel Maddow returns to hosting her MSNBC program five nights a week during the first 100 days of the Trump administration while Alex Wagner takes on field-reporting in 'Trumpland' that will be featured across the network/in specials..

https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/msnbc-shuffle-primetime-rachel-maddow-alex-wagner-trump-first-100-days-1236272693/

Despite her intention to focus more of her time on films, books, documentaries and podcasts, Rachel Maddow keeps getting tangled in MSNBC‘s primetime grid.

Maddow, who scaled back anchoring duties after the spring of 2022, holding forth only on Mondays, will return to five nights a week at that hour as part of a broader move by MSNBC to draw viewership to its coverage of the first 100 days of the Trump administration. Alex Wagner, who anchors 9 p.m. Tuesday through Friday, will take on a special assignment: traveling the U.S. and overseas in a bid to talk to both newsmakers tied to and people affected by Trump polices during his critical first weeks in office.

“The idea is to give MSNBC viewers a full, 360-degree view of what’s happening in the country in a way that you don’t necessarily get in the studio,” says Wagner, during an interview. Both she and Maddow are expected to return to their regular roles after April 30.

Blaukraut

(5,954 posts)
32. So Wagner will be doing the Trump Diner circuit?
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:52 PM
Jan 15

It wasn't enough that we had to listen to these ignoramuses for months before the election. Now we get to watch them gloat and praise dear leader for three more months. It's not like any of these reporters ever go on their MAGAt safaries to educate these people. It's all smile and nod, and then breathlessly reporting back to us about the opinions of the idiots.

tishaLA

(14,588 posts)
87. Ms Wagner's reports from the field during election season
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 10:27 PM
Jan 15

Were less than inspiring --,and I generally like her.She made trips to talk to voters in MI and PA and, rather than giving out information to those voters, she allowed flat out lied pass her by without a bit of pushback. I realize she was there to listen to them, but holy hell....at least knock down misinformation.

erodriguez

(856 posts)
94. Which amounts to zero
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:54 AM
Jan 16

People seem to cheering a billion dollar corporation as a savior here.

Just not gonna happen.

Hekate

(96,978 posts)
25. Three cheers for Rachel. The woman's a national treasure. Ditto to MSNBC for supporting her.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:37 PM
Jan 15

PortTack

(35,452 posts)
34. I see this comment a lot, what I is it that we are pushing back, and pushing back hard!
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:52 PM
Jan 15

I’m talking about congress members Hakeem Jefferies, AOC, Crockett, Raskin, the Jewish guy from FL and dozens more. Senators Whitehouse, Warren, Sanders, Schiff, Duckworth, Baldwin and dozens more. Governors from blue states that are launching protections against illegal act and laws by the gqp- Pritzker, Newsom, Moore, Cooper and a bunches more.

PortTack

(35,452 posts)
110. There was no offense intended. It's no different than saying the atheist from somewhere.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:50 PM
Jan 16

Lulu KC

(7,640 posts)
115. Since Jews have historically been stereotyped by appearance, unlike atheists, it's different.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 03:05 PM
Jan 16

I believe you when you say it wasn't your intention, but it clearly crosses a line. It's like saying, "He looks Jewish." It is a clear signal of anti-Semitism, unless you're Jewish. I can't tell if you are or not. It has been used for centuries to stereotype Jews negatively.


GoodRaisin

(10,045 posts)
30. I get the "100 days" piece of it, but why stop then?
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 05:47 PM
Jan 15

It needs to be a daily fight for 4 years.

yellow dahlia

(2,110 posts)
76. I don't think so.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:46 PM
Jan 15

I see the crucial hosts and journalists standing up and speaking the truth. They do so knowing they will become targets.

I believe there will be an audience for their truth and their quality programming.

Plus - they have the truly expert analysts. We will continue to need them.

Just MHO.

MiKenMi33

(218 posts)
53. Good for Rachel! It's going to take all of us though.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:58 PM
Jan 15

I used to watch Rachel and Lawrence all the time but found that after the election, watching any news left me drained. So I quit watching, I only got on on DU once a week and stayed completely off of social media. Maybe I’ll start watching again. I like to think there are plenty more that will resist but are biding their time. I also like to think their are plenty in authority who will resist and work behind the scenes to help protect us.

yellow dahlia

(2,110 posts)
79. I think Nicolle Wallace and Chris Hayes will also
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:53 PM
Jan 15

do a lot of standing up as this dystopian chapter plays out.

MiKenMi33

(218 posts)
82. Yes and hopefully their ratings will go up.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 09:09 PM
Jan 15

If they do then the higher ups will see the light.

Evolve Dammit

(20,429 posts)
55. Happy to rally around Rachel. Other Dems in leadership positions?? Not many speaking out. Just an observation.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 06:59 PM
Jan 15
 

Baron2024

(1,492 posts)
57. I Strongly Agree With The OP
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:06 PM
Jan 15

Cyrano, you are right on. Well said. This a a new Cold War, albeit a Cold Civil War. We need to fight it like one. One thing to do is to develop a counter-propaganda machine, as you suggest. Another is to support great journalists like Rachel Maddow. I think that she is the most important broadcast journalist in the country. She is a national treasure. Anyway, thank you for your excellent post.

HereForTheParty

(788 posts)
63. If Rachel Maddow is out biggest counterattack
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 07:50 PM
Jan 15

Goodness help us. MSNBC ratings are tiny these days. And a commentator shouldn't be leading anything of the sort.

yellow dahlia

(2,110 posts)
66. I agree with you. I believe Rachel is standing up and providing some of the leadership we need.
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:16 PM
Jan 15

Last edited Wed Jan 15, 2025, 08:55 PM - Edit history (1)

I am still trying to figure out what I can do.

One thing I am trying to do is give voice to the truth and the reality on Earth One.

Amaryllis

(10,197 posts)
118. Check out Indivisible if you are looking for something to do. THey have a weekly to do list that is spot on.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 05:54 PM
Jan 16
https://indivisible.org/
THe people who started it were long time congressional aides and really know how congress works and how to work congress.

BlueKentuckyGirl

(452 posts)
85. Steyer and Schultz
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 09:52 PM
Jan 15

When you mention Dem billionaires, Howard Schultz and Tom Steyer both come to mind. When their attempt to buy the presidency failed, they faded into the woodwork. Shameful.

Mysterian

(5,492 posts)
86. The old guard needs to step aside and let the new generation take the fight to the fascists
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 09:55 PM
Jan 15

Playing nice hasn't worked. The other side is the enemy of the nation.

bdamomma

(67,844 posts)
89. We are in
Wed Jan 15, 2025, 10:44 PM
Jan 15

this altogether. Our children and our children's children need a better life.

Now is the time to reflect and recharge and make good trouble.

hunter

(39,438 posts)
90. It's just a TV show.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 12:17 AM
Jan 16

That's where the Democratic Party failed in this election. Many younger voters don't see politics as anything more than a scripted television "reality show."

Sadly, they'll learn the hard way it's something more than that.

I don't watch Rachel Maddow or MSNBC. I don't watch any traditional advertising supported television. I think the young people are correct. Traditional television news and opinion is a reality show, disconnected from actual reality.



erodriguez

(856 posts)
93. Biggest counter attack?
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:47 AM
Jan 16

Corporate media doesn't give a fuck. They just care about ratings.

Rachel Maddow. She's great. But her going on the air every night amounts to a big zero in what happens for the first hundred days.

Cable news loves Trump.

flvegan

(64,868 posts)
99. Just the first 100 days is an all out counter attack? It's getting the viewers back in line
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 03:12 AM
Jan 16

for ratings. I love Maddow, but she's a stockholder with a contract to boot.

And the counter attack is on after Hayes' MSNothingButCommercials show, and broadcast where nobody that needs to see it, will.

Kaleva

(39,102 posts)
100. At her height, just a tiny percentage of adults watched her show
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 03:45 AM
Jan 16

Relatively very few adults watch cable news

 

ZonkerHarris

(25,577 posts)
101. MSNBC is desperate for their lost viewers. So Morning Joe kisses Trump's ass in the AM and
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 04:07 AM
Jan 16

Rachel rails at him in the PM.
Nice set up.
Won't win me back.
All TV News is corrupted now.

Cyrano

(15,388 posts)
105. I'm sure she's already on Trump's "Enemies List"
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 12:07 PM
Jan 16

But her five night a week stint will probably push her up to or near the top.

Just a "Journalist" on a little watched cable station? Not to Trump and his fellow thugs.

Are Democratic "leaders" going to just let her dangle out there by herself. Or will we see some hard core, ruthless leaders come forward to stand with her?

And if you think journalists can't make a difference, what do you think the so-called "journalists" on Fox have been doing all these years?

thebigidea

(13,489 posts)
107. I had no idea Maddow was at risk of dying for working a standard week
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:44 PM
Jan 16

Anybody else at MSNBC at risk of keeling over?

The actual staff that does the research maybe? Add some zeroes to their contracts to make up for it.

Cyrano

(15,388 posts)
111. In her own words, she said that
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:56 PM
Jan 16

the five night a week schedule she stuck with for years was "killing" her.

She's not just doing another one hour show. For all practical purposes, she is an investigative reporter. She's a modern day Woodward and Bernstein. My guess is she's at work at 6:00 am to prepare for a show that night. It's a schedule that is brutal. And once every fact is checked, every detail is double checked, and everyone she is going to mention is contacted to see if they want to say anything before she goes on the air, she must pull herself together and get in front of the camera. And she doesn't fill much time with guests. It's her, out there all alone most of the time, reading the teleprompter, most of which contains words that she herself wrote.

That schedule is a formula for exhaustion, a breakdown, or, yes, possible death.

Try working a schedule like that for a while and see how well you fare.

(For those who don't know, Rachel is a Rhodes Scholar, but that doesn't make what she does any easier.)

Prairie_Seagull

(4,052 posts)
109. If Rachel would call for a march on Washington.
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 01:49 PM
Jan 16

I would, sign in hand, drive my ass across this country to attend.

I am sure they have bollards in DC.

WokeAintWhatIAm

(15 posts)
116. Democracy is in peril
Thu Jan 16, 2025, 04:09 PM
Jan 16

It has been increasingly clear that the march toward an oligarchic order has been progressively taking shape since the advent of the Internet and the reporting of people (at the time considered gullible) by the abundance of information available to them at their fingertips, what has not been increasingly apparent is any effort consigned to disabusing those same susceptible people from information which is meant to influence them to their detriment, and their disempowerment.

Our fonts of information have to be trusted, reliable and verifiable. As much as Rachel Maddow IS we have to be purveyors of truth and perpetuators of truth and that line of communication has to be bi-directional.

Think about this, since 1965, we've had these voices which have emanated from the progressive social movements calling for freedom, justice, equality and fair treatment under the institutions which have impacted the lives of people. Discrimination and disenfranchisement was cultivated into gentrification, redlining, the war on drugs, mass incarceration. Ascribed criminalization, dehumanization, disregard and the creation of the myth of exceptionalism.

That same process of diminishing the traditionally disregarded elements of our nation in the form of the Poor, Black, Brown and White. The working person - regardless of color, is in danger of being placed into a Caste designed by people who believe themselves our betters, the war of information speaks to a terrible reality.

The greatest weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.
The society is you, the ruling class, the monied interests and their supporters are they who would subjugate you from the liberty you hold dear - we need to organize like our lives depend on it. Support independent sources of news and information and disconnect from the corporate power structure which broadcasts signals of control.

- Or is that too much at one time?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow announces a...